Тест, свързан с ръководство · Среден Ниво
Тест за качество на извличане
Проверете уместността на извличането, извикването и прецизността при прекъсване, класирането, текущите доказателства, разрешенията, неотговорните заявки и липсващата поддръжка.
Въпрос 1 на 8
Какво измерва recall@k за система за извличане?
Визуализирайте всеки въпрос8 въпроси
Отговорите и обясненията се появяват, докато отговаряте на теста.
- Какво измерва recall@k за система за извличане?
- Позицията на ранга на първия върнат подходящ документ
- Делът на водещите k резултата, които действително са подходящи
- Делът на всички съответни документи, намерени в горната k
- Времето, необходимо на системата да върне k резултата
- A retrieval evaluation cares whether the best evidence appears near the top. What kind of metric addresses that concern?
- A rank-aware metric
- A server uptime metric
- A count of stored files
- A tokenizer vocabulary size
- An exact order code is missed by semantic search, while a paraphrased question is missed by keyword search. What should the team inspect?
- Only the number of documents stored
- Whether every user asked the same question
- The appearance of the search button
- Each retrieval method’s blind spots on fixed examples
- A team adds hybrid retrieval and reranking. How should it judge whether the change helped?
- Compare only the highest similarity score after the change
- Evaluate both versions on the same fixed labeled examples
- Assume more retrieved passages always improve answers
- Count the number of model parameters rather than results
- A retrieved passage loses the sentence that qualifies its claim. What failure pattern should the reviewer flag?
- The source document was necessarily false
- The user must have asked an unanswerable question
- A passage was cut away from its qualification
- The search system returned too few languages
- In the guide’s constructed example, five passages are returned and three are relevant. What is precision at five?
- Three out of five, or 60%
- Three out of four, or 75%
- Five out of four, or 125%
- One out of five, or 20%
- Why should retrieval tests include access restrictions and unanswerable queries?
- To increase the average similarity score
- To check that the system avoids unauthorized evidence and unsupported answers
- To ensure every query returns a document
- To replace relevance labels
- A passage is about the right product but describes an older version. What does this show?
- The passage must rank first because it shares keywords
- The query has no retrieval requirements
- A high similarity score proves the answer
- Topical relevance alone may not provide evidence for the specific version or date in the question