Komawa Labarai
Mai jaridaAI Understanding takaitaccen bayani

Bincike Ya Nemo Shortan Taɗi na AI Rage Imani da Sabbin Maƙarƙashiya

Gwaje-gwajen Amurka guda biyu sun gano cewa tattaunawa ta Gemini sun rage imanin mahalarta cikin sabbin ka'idojin makirci fiye da hirarrakin da ba su da alaka kuma yawanci fiye da takaddun gaskiya.

5 min readRead the primary source
Takardun tushe na farkoAn rubuta tushen tushe
Mawallafi
Costello and colleagues' research paper on arXiv
Tushen hanyar haɗin gwiwa
arxiv.orghttps://arxiv.org/abs/2608.06151
Nau'in tushe
Takardun farko - sanarwar hukuma, takarda, yin rajista, ko shafi na farko da muka karanta kai tsaye.
MaganaFahimtar wannan a cikin daƙiƙa 60

Fara a nan

Mabuɗin sharuddan

Rabewa
Aiki inda samfurin ke sanya shigarwa zuwa ɗaya ko fiye da ƙayyadaddun ƙayyadaddun bayanai.
Gwada kankaAI Ethics Quiz

Me ya faru

Wata ƙungiyar bincike ta Carnegie Mellon, MIT, da Cornell sun buga nazarin shari'o'i biyu na bazuwar a ranar 6 ga Agusta don gwada ko gajeriyar tattaunawar AI za ta iya magance gaskatawar maƙarƙashiya yayin da bayanai game da manyan al'amura ke ci gaba da fitowa.

Masu binciken sun yi nazari kan manya 472 na Amurka wadanda suka bayyana ra'ayi na makirci bayan yunkurin kashe Donald Trump na Yuli 2024 da 1,035 bayan kisan gillar da aka yi wa Charlie Kirk a watan Satumbar 2025. An ba wa mahalarta taron ba da kayyade ba ga tattaunawar karya da aka keɓance, tattaunawar AI da ba ta da alaƙa, ko jerin abubuwan gaskiya na zamani.

Ƙungiyoyin tattaunawa sun kammala aƙalla musayar biyar tare da Gemini 1.5 Pro a gwajin farko da Gemini 2.5 Pro a cikin na biyu. Duk samfuran biyu sun sami ingantaccen tushe wanda ya raba tabbataccen bayanai, da'awar da ba a warware ba, da tambayoyin da ba a warware ba; samfurin na biyu kuma zai iya bincika gidan yanar gizo kawai don tabbatar da bayanan gaskiya.

A kan ma'auni na 0-zuwa-100 na imani a cikin ka'idar da aka bayyana kowane ɗan takara, tattaunawar da aka keɓance ta haifar da raguwar maki 6.95 dangane da sarrafa taɗi mara alaƙa a gwajin farko da maki 7.56 a cikin na biyu. Bambance-bambance daga takaddar gaskiyar sun kasance 5.60 da maki 6.56. Takardar ta ba da rahoton daidaitattun tasirin kusan 0.32 zuwa 0.38 don waɗannan kwatancen.

An tsara nazarin shari'o'i biyu a kusa da lokacin da rikodin gaskiya ke ci gaba. Na farko ya biyo bayan yunkurin kashe Donald Trump na Yuli 2024; na biyu ya biyo bayan kisan da aka yi wa Charlie Kirk a watan Satumbar 2025. An tantance mahalarta don maƙarƙashiya ko fassarorin da ba su da tabbas, sannan aka sanya su zuwa tattaunawar da ta magance ka'idar da suka bayyana, taɗi na AI da ba ta da alaƙa, ko takaddar gaskiya ta zamani. Binciken na biyu an riga an yi masa rijista, yayin da na farko ba a yi shi ba, don haka kwafin yana da bayani amma bai yi daidai da gwaje-gwajen tabbatar da zaman kansu guda biyu ba.

Bayanan tushe: Costello and colleagues' research paper on arXiv

Me ya sa yake da mahimmanci

Sakamakon ya nuna cewa tsarin tattaunawa zai iya yin fiye da maimaita gyara: yana iya daidaita gaskiya, tambayoyi, da rashin tabbas ga takamaiman dalilin da mutum ya bayar don gaskatawa.

Wannan bambance-bambancen yana da amfani yayin al'amuran da ke tafiya cikin sauri, lokacin da tabbataccen shaida ba ta cika ba kuma takaddar gaskiyar ba za ta iya magance iƙirarin da a zahiri mutum ya sami lallashi ba. Binciken dabarun takarda ya gano cewa samfurin ya dogara da tushe masu inganci, buɗaɗɗen tambayoyi, da taka tsantsan lokacin da ba a san komai ba, sannan ya yi amfani da ƙarin shaidar kai tsaye lokacin da taron na biyu ya sami babban rikodin gaskiya.

Marubutan kuma sun ba da rahoton taƙaitaccen shaida na malala daga baya. Watanni biyu bayan gwajin farko, mahalarta da aka sanya wa tattaunawar ba su da yuwuwa fiye da yadda ake sarrafa su don amincewa da fassarori biyu na makirci na wani abu mai zuwa. A cikin bibiyar na biyu, aikin jiyya kai tsaye bai rage imani ba game da harbi daga baya ba, kodayake wani bincike na dagewa na daban da aka riga aka yi rajista da babban ma'aunin makirci ya ba da shawarar ƙarami.

Zane ya nuna dalilin da ya sa hulɗar na iya wuce daidaitaccen gyara ba tare da tabbatar da cewa lallashi yana da kyau ko da yaushe. Gemini 1.5 Pro a cikin binciken farko da Gemini 2.5 Pro a cikin na biyu sun sami tushe na gaskiya da masu bincike ke raba ingantattun bayanai, da'awar da ba a warware ba, da tambayoyin da ba a warware ba. Samfurin na iya yin tambaya game da takamaiman dalilin ɗan takara kuma ya zaɓi ko zai amsa kai tsaye, faɗi tabbataccen shaida, ko kiyaye rashin tabbas. Wannan daidaitawa yana da amfani ga ilimi, amma kuma yana ba da tsarin sanin ko wanene da'awar ƙalubalanci da kuma tushen da ke gaba.

Binciken bai ba da hujjar tura bots masu jan hankali kai tsaye cikin tattaunawar jama'a ba. Tsarin da aka ba da umarni don canza imani yana riƙe da iko mai ban mamaki, kuma marubutan sun lura cewa irin wannan dabaru kuma na iya ƙara imani da da'awar ƙarya. Duk wani sabis na gaske zai buƙaci mawallafi na gaskiya, ingantaccen abin da ya faru, kariya daga manufa ta siyasa, da gwaje-gwaje masu zaman kansu na daidaito da tasirin da ba a yi niyya ba.

Interactive Mechanism

Ingantacciyar hanyar sadarwa: Yadda A zahiri yake Aiki

Bincika fasahar da ke bayan wannan ci gaban ta hanyar mu'amala.

Thinking Budget (Test-Time Tokens):1,024 tokens
Complex Accuracy79%Math & Code Logic
Latency3.2sTime to first full output
Inference Cost$0.0092Per query estimated
Reasoning StyleStep VerificationInternal chain depth
Active Thinking Trace:
1Deconstruct user problem into formal constraints
2Propose candidate hypotheses & step-by-step calculation
3Self-correction: Backtrack and refute subtle edge cases
4Exhaustive consistency check & final output synthesis
Core takeaway: Test-time compute fundamentally changes AI economics. Instead of only scaling during pre-training, giving reasoning models more tokens at inference time allows them to systematically solve PhD-level STEM problems.
Duba ra'ayi na hulɗa+10 Points
AI Ethics Quiz

Impossibility results in algorithmic fairness (e.g. Kleinberg et al., Chouldechova) show what?

Abin kallo na gaba

Duba don bitar takwarorinsu, kwafi fiye da rikice-rikicen siyasar Amurka guda biyu, da kuma shaidar filin da ke nuna ko mutane sun zaɓi yin amfani da irin wannan kayan aiki ba tare da an ɗauke su cikin binciken ba.

Wannan sabon bugu ne da aka gina a kusa da nazarin shari'a biyu. Gwajin farko ba a riga an yi rajista ba, na biyu kuma shine, kuma duka biyun sun auna imanin da aka bayar da rahoton kai tsaye bayan ɗan gajeren hulɗar kan layi maimakon halin raba-hannun duniya, jefa ƙuri'a, ko amana na dogon lokaci.

Samfuran da aka tantance sun haɗa da mahalarta kawai waɗanda aka rarraba jawabansu a buɗe a matsayin makirci ko rashin tabbas ta hanyar GPT-4o, kodayake marubutan suna ba da rahoton irin wannan tsari ƙarƙashin wasu ƙa'idodin rarrabuwa. Duk waɗannan karatun sun ɗauki manya na Amurka ta hanyar CloudResearch, don haka binciken bazai canjawa wuri zuwa wasu ƙasashe, harsuna, abubuwan da suka faru, ko yawan jama'a ba.

Samfuran ba su dogara ga ilimin da ba a taimaka ba: masu bincike sun ba da a hankali tattara tushen gaskiya da kuma takamaiman umarnin lallashi. Ya kamata aiki na gaba ya gwada wanda ke kiyaye waɗannan gaskiyar a ƙarƙashin matsin lamba, yadda ake gyara kurakurai, ko ana kula da ra'ayoyin adawa akai-akai, da kuma lokacin da tsarin ya kamata ya kiyaye rashin tabbas maimakon ƙoƙarin lallashi.

Hakanan akwai bambancin ma'auni tsakanin canza imani da aka bayyana da kuma inganta fahimtar mutum. Sakamako sun kasance kimomi da kansu da aka tattara bayan gajerun tattaunawa ta kan layi, ba a lura da halayen rabawa ba, bincika tushen, jefa kuri'a, ko yanke shawara da aka yanke yayin rikicin kai tsaye. Bibiyar takarda ta ba da shaidar farko game da dagewa, amma sakamakon da aka haɗe yana nufin binciken daga baya ya kamata ya rigaya ya yi rajistar sakamako na dogon lokaci, bin diddigin waƙa, da gwada ko mahalarta zasu iya bayyana shaidar da kansu maimakon kawai maimaita ƙarshen samfurin.

Maimaitawa yakamata ya bambanta tushen bayanan gaskiya da kuma yawan jama'a. Waɗannan gwaje-gwajen sun ba da tushe na gaskiya na masu bincike kuma sun ɗauki manya na Amurka ta hanyar CloudResearch, wanda ke sa saitin ya zama mai sarrafawa amma yana barin buɗaɗɗen tambayoyi game da abubuwan da suka faru na harsuna da yawa, saitunan haɗin kai, da rikice-rikice waɗanda bayanan hukuma ke jinkiri ko jayayya. Gwajin filin da ke da alhakin zai sa marubucin samfurin ya bayyana, bari mahalarta su ƙi sa baki, su rubuta shaidar da aka nuna, kuma su yi amfani da masu shari'a masu zaman kansu don bincika ko tattaunawar ta gyara kuskure ba tare da gabatar da wata sabuwa ba. Ya kamata ya auna amana, martanin tunani, da kuma shirye-shiryen raba da'awar tare da makin imani.

Jagorori masu alaƙa & tambayoyin tambayoyi

Ɗa'a ta AIAI TsaroMenene AI?Gwada abin da kuka sani - gwada gwajin AI kyautaNemo kalmar AI a cikin ƙamus ɗin mu
An sami wannan yana da amfani?