가이드 연계 퀴즈 · 중간 레벨
AI 요약 퀴즈
목적에 따른 요약, 추출적 문구와 추상적 문구, 누락, 소스 일관성, 테이블 세부정보, 제안과 결정 오류를 테스트합니다.
질문 1 의 8
A manager needs a decision brief rather than an introductory overview. What should the summarizer define first?
모든 질문 미리보기8 질문
퀴즈를 풀면 정답과 설명이 나타납니다.
- A manager needs a decision brief rather than an introductory overview. What should the summarizer define first?
- Audience, length and required decision fields
- Only a target word count with no audience
- The most fluent style regardless of purpose
- A fixed template that ignores the source
- How can an extractive summary differ from an abstractive one?
- It always preserves all important context
- It is guaranteed to be factually faithful
- It selects existing passages rather than generating new wording
- It can summarize only audio recordings
- A summary accurately describes one section but misses the central result. Which quality failed?
- Factual consistency of the included sentence
- Coverage of important source material
- Grammar in the selected section
- The ability to cite a source passage
- Meeting notes say Friday was proposed, but the team deferred its decision. Which summary is faithful?
- The team approved Friday because it was discussed
- Friday was rejected permanently
- The meeting contained no release-date discussion
- Friday was proposed; the date remains undecided pending testing
- A report summary includes a number from a table. Which source details should be checked?
- Only the number of table rows
- Only whether the output uses JSON
- Units, row labels and footnotes around that value
- Only the report’s cover image
- Why can a summary of summaries be risky for a long document?
- Each stage can discard qualifications or relationships needed later
- It always makes the context window longer
- It converts confirmed results into source links automatically
- The final summary must be extractive
- A short summary quotes one sentence exactly but omits the qualifying sentence beside it. What is the risk?
- Exact quotation guarantees fair representation
- The source document becomes invalid
- The quote can no longer be linked to its origin
- The selection can create a misleading impression despite exact words
- An analyst adds their own interpretation to a source summary. How should it be presented?
- Blend it into the source’s claims without notice
- Label it as analysis and keep readers’ path to the source
- Replace the source passage with the interpretation
- Treat it as a verified quotation