가이드 연계 퀴즈 · 중간 레벨
준지도 학습 퀴즈의 일관성 정규화
라벨 보존 교란, 일관성 손실, 라벨이 지정되지 않은 입력, 교사 목표, 신뢰 게이트 및 평가를 테스트합니다.
질문 1 의 8
What is the main consistency assumption?
모든 질문 미리보기8 질문
퀴즈를 풀면 정답과 설명이 나타납니다.
- What is the main consistency assumption?
- Any change to an input must change its class
- Unlabeled data should be assigned random labels
- Small label-preserving perturbations should not change the model’s prediction
- All examples should produce identical outputs
- How is an unlabeled example used in a basic consistency loss?
- Assign it a verified ground-truth label
- Use it only to compute classification accuracy
- Remove it after augmentation
- Compare predictions from two perturbed views and penalize their difference
- Which is an example of a label-preserving image perturbation when appropriate?
- A modest crop or rotation that leaves the object class unchanged
- Replacing the object with a different class
- Removing all pixels containing the target
- Changing the label at random
- What does the low-density decision-boundary intuition suggest?
- Place a boundary through every cluster center
- Place decision boundaries away from dense groups of similar unlabeled examples
- Ignore the unlabeled distribution
- Force every cluster to have one class
- What is a stop-gradient doing in a teacher-student consistency setup?
- It removes the unsupervised loss
- It freezes every model parameter permanently
- It prevents the target branch from receiving the matching-loss gradient
- It makes both views identical
- How does FixMatch use confidence?
- It uses every weak prediction as a hard label
- It sets confidence to one for all classes
- It drops the strongly augmented view
- It keeps a pseudo-label from a weak view only when confidence passes a threshold
- Why are unlabeled examples useful in this method?
- They provide additional input structure without requiring a human label for each example
- They guarantee the class labels are correct
- They replace the labeled validation set
- They eliminate the need for augmentation
- Which evaluation would best test a consistency method’s intended behavior?
- Check only training loss
- Measure prediction stability across label-preserving views and task quality on held-out labeled data
- Test on a single augmented view
- Count unlabeled examples without measuring outputs