Guide-yakabatana mibvunzo · Pakati Nhanho

LoRA uye Parameter-Inoshanda Tuning Quiz

Ongorora uremu hweLoRA akaomeswa nechando, kudzidziswa-nyika kuchengetedza, chinzvimbo, QLoRA chengetedzo, kusanganisa kunoenderana, mabhesi akagovaniswa, parameter kuverenga, uye kaviri quantization.

Nzira dzekutungamira dzinoenderanaLora Uye Parameter Kunyatsoita Tuning
Mubvunzo 1 ye 8

In the original LoRA formulation for a selected weight matrix, what is learned while that matrix stays frozen?

Tarisa mubvunzo wese8 mibvunzo

Mhinduro uye tsananguro zvinoonekwa paunenge uchitora bvunzo.

  1. In the original LoRA formulation for a selected weight matrix, what is learned while that matrix stays frozen?
    • A replacement vocabulary with no weight update
    • Every entry of the full base matrix from random initialization
    • Two factor matrices forming an additive low-rank update
    • A permanent deletion of the entire selected layer
  2. Which resource requirements can fewer trainable LoRA parameters reduce compared with full fine-tuning?
    • Every base-model computation by definition
    • All activation storage regardless of the training procedure
    • A guaranteed universal percentage of total runtime memory
    • Optimizer-state and task-checkpoint requirements
  3. Chii chinonzi chinzvimbo 'r' muLoRA adapter control?
    • Iyo yemukati dimension yeaviri-akaderera-chinzvimbo matrices, kuseta adapta kugona
    • Nhamba yezvikamu mumuenzaniso wepasi
    • Chiyero chekudzidza panguva yekudzidziswa
    • Ingani maGPU anodiwa
  4. Which storage and adaptation choices are combined in the QLoRA paper?
    • Updating every base weight directly as a 4-bit integer gradient
    • A frozen low-bit base with trainable LoRA adapters
    • Removing all adapters and all task data
    • A guarantee that every model fits every consumer GPU
  5. What can a compatible dense merge of a LoRA update remove from that layer's inference computation?
    • The need to evaluate the base layer at all
    • Every possible dtype compatibility requirement
    • A requirement that all future task updates become identical
    • The need to evaluate a separate adapter branch
  6. Which reuse pattern is supported by storing compatible task adapters separately from a base checkpoint?
    • Every adapter automatically makes every task factually correct
    • All serving systems must switch tasks with zero overhead
    • Multiple task updates can share the same pretrained base
    • The base checkpoint is no longer needed for inference
  7. For a stated 4-by-4 weight update with rank-one factors shaped 4-by-1 and 1-by-4, how many factor parameters are there?
    • Gumi nenhanhatu
    • Zvisere
    • Zvina
    • Thirty-two
  8. What does QLoRA's double-quantization technique compress in addition to the base weight representation?
    • The quantization constants
    • Every task label into a second unrelated category
    • The adapter gradients twice by definition
    • A second complete copy of the base model