Guide-yakabatana mibvunzo · Pakati Nhanho

Lottery Tikiti Hypothesis Quiz

Tarisa manzwisisiro ako ematiketi erotari, kutanga, kuchekerera, uye miganho yezvikumbiro nezve sparse neural network.

Nzira dzekutungamira dzinoenderanaLottery Tikiti Hypothesis
Mubvunzo 1 ye 8

Chii chinonzi 'hwina tikiti' mune iyi hypothesis?

Tarisa mubvunzo wese8 mibvunzo

Mhinduro uye tsananguro zvinoonekwa paunenge uchitora bvunzo.

  1. Chii chinonzi 'hwina tikiti' mune iyi hypothesis?
    • A sparse subnetwork iyo, yakadzidziswa kubva kune yayo yekutanga init, inoenderana netiweki yakazara
    • Netiweki ine ma parameter akawanda kupfuura emazuva ese
    • Modhi yakadzidziswa yakatorwa kubva painternet
    • A randomly fungidziro seti ye hyperparameters
  2. In the original lottery-ticket experiments, what was paired with the discovered sparse mask when retraining a ticket?
    • Fresh random values for every surviving weight
    • The surviving weights’ matched original initialization
    • A different architecture for each pruning round
    • The final trained weights with no resetting
  3. Ndiani akakurudzira iyo Lottery Tikiti Hypothesis?
    • Goodfellow (2014)
    • Krizhevsky, Sutskever, Hinton (2012)
    • Frankle naCarbin (2018)
    • Sirivha nevanoshanda navo (2016)
  4. Which procedure did the original Lottery Ticket Hypothesis paper use to identify winning tickets?
    • Randomly remove a fixed half of all weights once
    • Iterative magnitude pruning with a reset to the original initialization
    • Add dropout after each pruning round
    • Increase the learning rate after every epoch
  5. How should the idea that overparameterization helps optimization find a trainable sparse structure be described?
    • A conjecture or proposed explanation, not a result established by the original experiments
    • A theorem proven for every neural-network architecture
    • A guarantee that all weights can be removed without loss
    • A claim that pruning eliminates the need for training data
  6. What does a strong lottery-ticket result claim in its theoretical setting?
    • Every randomly initialized network already solves any task
    • A sufficiently overparameterized randomly initialized network can contain a pruned subnetwork that approximates a target without further weight training
    • Pruning always preserves the trained model’s accuracy
    • A sparse network never needs data
  7. What does iterative magnitude pruning remove at each pruning step?
    • The training examples with the lowest labels
    • The neurons with the most outgoing connections
    • Weights with the smallest magnitudes
    • All weights in the final layer
  8. Which datasets were used in the original paper’s reported lottery-ticket experiments?
    • ImageNet and COCO only
    • LibriSpeech and Common Voice
    • SQuAD and GLUE
    • MNIST and CIFAR-10