Guide-yakabatana mibvunzo · Pakati Nhanho

Kuramba Sampling Fine-Tuning Quiz

Inovhara chizvarwa chemumiriri uye kusefa, mibairo-yakavakirwa-yeverifier, inotariswa kudzidzisazve, uye njodzi kubva mukugonesa ane akakanganisa.

Nzira dzekutungamira dzinoenderanaKuramba Sampling Fine Tuning
Mubvunzo 1 ye 8

Which loop best describes how Rejection Sampling Fine-Tuning improves a model?

Tarisa mubvunzo wese8 mibvunzo

Mhinduro uye tsananguro zvinoonekwa paunenge uchitora bvunzo.

  1. Which loop best describes how Rejection Sampling Fine-Tuning improves a model?
    • Gadzira mhinduro dzakawanda dzemumiriri, chengeta dzakanyanya-zvibodzwa, uye dzokorora pazviri
    • Dzima yakaipisisa-inoita modhi layers
    • Ramba data rese rekudzidziswa uye tanga patsva
    • Sample kamwe uye gara uchigamuchira zvakabuda
  2. Munzvimbo dzinotariswa semasvomhu kana kodhi, chii chinogona kushanda semubairo?
    • A akadzidza mubairo modhi chete
    • Kuti mhinduro ndeyechokwadi here kana kuti bvunzo dzakapasa
    • Hurefu hwemhinduro
    • Nhamba yezviratidzo zvakagadzirwa
  3. Which model family does the cited paper describe using rejection sampling in its alignment pipeline?
    • GPT-4o
    • BERT Base
    • Meta’s Llama 2-Chat
    • Whisper Large
  4. Why might a team choose rejection-sampling fine-tuning over a policy-gradient approach for some tasks?
    • It never needs a candidate generator or scoring rule
    • It guarantees no reward hacking
    • It always requires less compute than every RL method
    • It can use supervised learning on selected generations instead of updating through policy-gradient RL
  5. Kudzidzira pane yakanyanya-mubayiro samples zvinobudirira kunoita chii?
    • Distills yakanakisa-ye-N mhando mune imwe modhi-yemuenzaniso zvinobuda
    • Inowedzera saizi yemazwi
    • Inobvisa kugona kwemuenzaniso kugadzira zvinyorwa
    • Inopeta kaviri parameter kuverenga
  6. What should teams monitor when repeatedly fine-tuning on filtered model-generated outputs?
    • Only the number of model parameters
    • Output diversity alongside held-out correctness
    • Whether every answer uses the same wording
    • Only the training loss on selected samples
  7. What is a limitation of rejection-sampling fine-tuning’s candidate selection?
    • It can only be used with image labels
    • It always changes the tokenizer
    • It cannot train on a high-quality answer that was never generated or retained
    • It makes the scoring function unnecessary
  8. What risk arises if the scoring model used to filter candidates is flawed?
    • The policy becomes unable to generate any text
    • The tokenizer automatically changes vocabulary
    • The reference labels become unnecessary
    • The policy may learn to exploit the scorer rather than improve the intended quality