Kedis ku xidhan hagaha · Dhexdhexaad Heerka
AI ee Xisaabiyaha Dabiiciga ah Kediska
Wuxuu tijaabiyaa falanqaynta lambar ee sharciga Benford, falanqaynta isku xidhka dhinacyada la xidhiidha iyo raadinta maalgelinta, iyo waxa ka dhigaya natiijooyinka AI-caawintu ay u hayaan caddayn khabiir.
Su'aal 1 ee 8
Tijaabo Benford oo ku salaysan laba xaraf ee hore ee fadhiyada waxay muujinaysaa kor u kaca 49, xadka ogolaanshaha shirkadduna waa $5,000. Sidee buu xisaabaadaha forensics u eegi doonaa natiijooyinkan?
Horudhac su'aal kasta8 su'aalo
Jawaabaha iyo sharraxaadaha waxay soo baxayaan markaad qaadanayso kediska.
- Tijaabo Benford oo ku salaysan laba xaraf ee hore ee fadhiyada waxay muujinaysaa kor u kaca 49, xadka ogolaanshaha shirkadduna waa $5,000. Sidee buu xisaabaadaha forensics u eegi doonaa natiijooyinkan?
- As proof that the approver committed fraud
- As a lead suggesting purchases may have been split to stay under the limit, which needs follow-up
- As a sign the dataset is too small for Benford analysis
- As evidence that Benford's law never applies to invoices
- Mid ka mid ah xogtan hoose ee ugu yar ee loo isticmaali karo falanqaynta sharciga Benford?
- Vendor invoice amounts ranging from $10 to $500,000
- Employee expense claims across many sizes
- Sequentially assigned invoice numbers
- Sales totals by customer over a year
- Sharciga Benford, qaansanad, inta jeer ee xarafka hore uu noqdo 1 xog la mid ah?
- About 30 percent of the time
- About 11 percent of the time
- About 46 percent of the time
- About 5 percent of the time
- Maxay xirfadlayaashu badanaa doortaan kala duwanaanta dhexdhexaadka ah ee dhammaystiran (mean absolute deviation) ka badan chi-square marka la tijaabayo la midnimada Benford xogta weyn?
- Mean absolute deviation needs no computer to calculate
- Chi-square only works on second-digit tests
- Mean absolute deviation automatically identifies the fraudster
- Chi-square treats trivial deviations as significant when the dataset is large
- Falanqaynta xiriirka waxay muujinaysaa in iibiyuhu uu diiwaangeliyay cinwaanka guri ee hoggaamiyaha shirkadda. Maxaa ugu muhiimsan ee tani u muujinayso?
- The supplier's invoices follow Benford's law
- The director has a conflict of interest that was properly disclosed
- A possible undisclosed related party relationship
- A problem with the tracing method chosen
- In fund tracing through commingled accounts, what decides whether a method such as the lowest intermediate balance rule is used?
- The default setting of the tracing software
- A legal choice about which tracing convention applies
- The number of transactions in the account
- Whether the data conforms to Benford's law
- What do Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the Daubert standard require of expert testimony in US federal courts?
- That every finding be produced by machine learning
- That the expert use only Benford's law
- That the analysis cover the entire population of transactions
- That the testimony rest on reliable methods that were properly applied
- When resolving entities for link analysis, which shared attribute gives the strongest evidence that two records belong to the same party?
- A shared bank account number
- A shared surname
- A shared city
- A shared industry code