Kedis ku xidhan hagaha · Adag Heerka
AI ee Maxkamadaha iyo Kediska Qiimaynta Khatarta Garsoorka
Wuxuu tijaabiyaa sida buundooyinka halista ka hor u shaqeeyaan, waxa COMPAS iyo dooda ProPublica ay daaha ka qaadeen, iyo sababta isku-dheellitirka iyo khaladaadka siman ee isku dhacsan karaan.
Su'aal 1 ee 8
Maxay soo saartaa Qiimaynta Badbaadada Dadweynaha (PSA)?
Horudhac su'aal kasta8 su'aalo
Jawaabaha iyo sharraxaadaha waxay soo baxayaan markaad qaadanayso kediska.
- Maxay soo saartaa Qiimaynta Badbaadada Dadweynaha (PSA)?
- A single guilt probability for use at trial
- A recommended prison sentence in months
- Separate scores for failure to appear and new criminal activity, plus a flag for new violent criminal activity
- A psychological profile based on a long interview
- What did ProPublica's 2016 analysis of COMPAS in Broward County report?
- Black defendants who did not reoffend were nearly twice as likely as white defendants to be labeled higher risk
- COMPAS scores were identical for all defendants
- White defendants were more often labeled high risk and then did not reoffend
- COMPAS predicted reoffending perfectly
- How did Northpointe respond to ProPublica's findings?
- It withdrew COMPAS from the market
- It admitted the tool was intentionally biased
- It said race was the most important input
- It argued the scores were equally predictive: a given score matched similar reoffense rates across races
- Waa maxay sababta dhibcaha khatarta ah guud ahaan aan loo qiyaasi karin oo ay u yeelan karaan qiime been abuur ah oo been ah iyo kuwa beenta ah isku mar?
- Because the models are too small
- Because the groups have different underlying base rates of the outcome
- Because judges refuse to use calibrated tools
- Because ROC curves cannot be computed for criminal data
- Maxay Maxkamadda Sare ee Wisconsin go'aan ka gaartay Gobolka Loomis (2016)?
- COMPAS scores are banned in all sentencing
- Defendants must be shown COMPAS source code
- A judge may consider a COMPAS score with warnings about its limits, but it cannot be the deciding factor
- Risk scores must replace judicial discretion
- What is 'label bias' in pretrial risk tools?
- Rearrest, the outcome being predicted, reflects police contact rather than actual offending
- Defendants are given inaccurate name labels in the database
- Scores are printed in colors that bias judges
- Labels are assigned randomly during training
- What does the area under the ROC curve (AUC) measure for a risk tool?
- Whether scores mean the same thing across racial groups
- How many defendants a court processes per day
- The legal validity of the tool under due process
- How well the scores rank people who later fail above those who do not
- According to the guide, which statement about most judicial risk assessment tools is accurate?
- They are advanced deep learning systems that read case files
- They are mostly transparent statistical models that use only a handful of factors
- They make final bail decisions without a judge
- They are only used in federal courts