Kedis ku xidhan hagaha · Adag Heerka
Heerarka dhalanteedka ee Kediska Qalabka AI ee Sharci
Wuxuu tijaabiyaa sida daraasadaha Stanford ay u qeexeen oo ay u cabbireen aragtiyaha AI ee sharciga ah, maxay jawaabaha khaldan yihiin, iyo sababta dib-u-soo-celinta-jiilka la kordhiyey uu weli u guuldareysto.
Su'aal 1 ee 8
Sidee buu Stanford u noqday "Hallucination-free?" daraasaddu waxay qeexdaa dhalanteed?
Horudhac su'aal kasta8 su'aalo
Jawaabaha iyo sharraxaadaha waxay soo baxayaan markaad qaadanayso kediska.
- Sidee buu Stanford u noqday "Hallucination-free?" daraasaddu waxay qeexdaa dhalanteed?
- Any answer longer than the source document
- An answer that is either incorrect or misgrounded
- Only a citation to a case that does not exist
- Any answer the tool took more than a minute to produce
- Marka la eego shuruudaha daraasadda Stanford, waa maxay jawaabta 'qaldan'?
- An answer that refuses to respond
- An answer written in the wrong language
- An answer with no citations at all
- An answer that cites a real source that does not support its claim
- Qalabkee ayaa si fiican u sameeyay imtixaankii Stanford 2024 laakiin wali lagu sawiray in ka badan boqolkiiba 17 su'aalaha?
- Lexis+ AI
- Westlaw AI-Assisted Research
- Ask Practical Law AI
- GPT-4 used as a comparison
- Immisa kala duwan oo dhalanteed ah ayay "khiyaasooyinka sharciga ah ee waaweyn" ka heleen chatbots ujeedo-guud ah oo ku saabsan su'aalaha maxkamadda federaalka ee la xaqiijin karo?
- 1 to 3 percent
- 17 to 33 percent
- 69 to 88 percent
- 95 to 100 percent
- Maxay tahay sababta tallaabada dib u soo celinta ay u heli karto maamulka khaldan xitaa marka kaydka xogta uu ka kooban yahay mid sax ah?
- Legal databases are encrypted and cannot be searched
- Retrieval only works for statutes, not cases
- Retrieval ranks documents alphabetically
- Retrieval matches similar wording or meaning, which is not the same as legal relevance
- What tendency did the research find when questions contained a false premise?
- Models tended to accept the premise and answer as if it were true
- Models always corrected the premise
- Models refused every such question
- Models replied only with the text of the relevant statute
- Which mitigation specifically helps flag a cited case that was later reversed or overruled?
- Raising the model's temperature setting
- Making answers shorter
- Translating the query into another language
- Connecting a citator such as KeyCite or Shepard's
- What marketing claim did the Stanford study's title directly question?
- That legal AI tools were cheaper than paralegals
- That some tools were 'hallucination-free'
- That legal AI could pass the bar exam
- That AI tools were approved by courts