Kedis ku xidhan hagaha · Dhexdhexaad Heerka

Diidmada Muunad bixinta Fine-Tuning Kediska

Waxay dabooshaa jiilka musharraxiinta iyo shaandhaynta, abaal-marinnada ku salaysan hubinta, dib-u-habaynta kormeerka, iyo khataraha ka yimaadda hagaajinta gool dhaliye cilladaysan.

Wadooyinka haga ee la xidhiidhaDiidmada Muunad-bixinta Fiican
Su'aal 1 ee 8

Which loop best describes how Rejection Sampling Fine-Tuning improves a model?

Horudhac su'aal kasta8 su'aalo

Jawaabaha iyo sharraxaadaha waxay soo baxayaan markaad qaadanayso kediska.

  1. Which loop best describes how Rejection Sampling Fine-Tuning improves a model?
    • Samee jawaabaha musharraxiinta badan, hay kuwa ugu dhibcaha badan, oo dib u tababar iyaga
    • Tirtir lakabyada moodeelka ugu waxqabadka xun
    • Diid dhammaan xogta tababarka oo dib u bilow
    • Tusaalaha hal mar oo had iyo jeer aqbal wax soo saarka
  2. Goobaha la xaqiijin karo sida xisaabta ama koodka, maxaa u adeegi kara abaal-marin ahaan?
    • Qaabka abaalgudka la bartay oo keliya
    • Hadday jawaabtu sax tahay ama imtixaanadu ha dhaafaan
    • Dhererka jawaabta
    • Tirada calaamadaha la sameeyay
  3. Which model family does the cited paper describe using rejection sampling in its alignment pipeline?
    • GPT-4o
    • BERT Base
    • Meta’s Llama 2-Chat
    • Whisper Large
  4. Why might a team choose rejection-sampling fine-tuning over a policy-gradient approach for some tasks?
    • It never needs a candidate generator or scoring rule
    • It guarantees no reward hacking
    • It always requires less compute than every RL method
    • It can use supervised learning on selected generations instead of updating through policy-gradient RL
  5. Tababarka ku saabsan muunadaha abaal-marinta ugu sarreeya si wax ku ool ah muxuu sameeyaa?
    • Waxay u kala saartaa tayada ugu wanaagsan ee N soo saarida hal muunada ee moodeelka
    • Waxay kordhisaa cabbirka erayada
    • Waxa ay meesha ka saartaa awooda moodeelka in uu qoraal soo saaro
    • Laba jibaaraya tirinta cabbirka
  6. What should teams monitor when repeatedly fine-tuning on filtered model-generated outputs?
    • Only the number of model parameters
    • Output diversity alongside held-out correctness
    • Whether every answer uses the same wording
    • Only the training loss on selected samples
  7. What is a limitation of rejection-sampling fine-tuning’s candidate selection?
    • It can only be used with image labels
    • It always changes the tokenizer
    • It cannot train on a high-quality answer that was never generated or retained
    • It makes the scoring function unnecessary
  8. What risk arises if the scoring model used to filter candidates is flawed?
    • The policy becomes unable to generate any text
    • The tokenizer automatically changes vocabulary
    • The reference labels become unnecessary
    • The policy may learn to exploit the scorer rather than improve the intended quality