Maswali yanayounganishwa na mwongozo · Ngumu Kiwango
Maswali ya Kuimarisha Mafunzo
Tekeleza dhana za uimarishaji wa ujifunzaji kwenye uchunguzi, marejesho yaliyopunguzwa bei, zawadi zilizocheleweshwa, vikomo vya uigaji na kutofaulu kwa malengo ya zawadi za wakala.
Swali 1 ya 8
A warehouse robot tries an unfamiliar aisle to learn whether it shortens delivery time. Which side of the exploration–exploitation trade-off is this?
Hakiki kila swali8 maswali
Majibu na maelezo huonekana unapojibu maswali.
- A warehouse robot tries an unfamiliar aisle to learn whether it shortens delivery time. Which side of the exploration–exploitation trade-off is this?
- Exploration: testing an action whose value is uncertain
- Exploitation: choosing the currently highest-valued action
- Reward shaping: changing the objective after acting
- Imitation: copying a labeled action
- Rewards arrive as 2, 0 and 5 in a three-step episode. With discount factor 0.9, what is the return from the first step?
- 7
- 6.05
- 6.5
- 4.05
- A designer raises gamma in a discounted-return objective. What changes?
- The agent stops exploring
- The reward function becomes a probability distribution
- Future rewards count more relative to immediate rewards
- Past rewards are counted again
- A policy receives a reward only after a long sequence of actions. Which credit-assignment question arises?
- Which input column has the longest name?
- Whether every action must receive the same reward
- Whether the final reward erases all prior observations
- Which earlier actions contributed to the eventual outcome
- A game agent earns points by collecting a harmless bonus, then ignores the mission because the bonus is easy to repeat. What failure does this illustrate?
- Reward hacking: optimizing a proxy reward in a way that misses the intended goal
- Catastrophic forgetting
- Exploration collapse caused by gamma
- A transition model error
- A robot policy performs well in simulation. Why does it still need evaluation for its intended real deployment?
- Simulation success proves every real-world action is safe
- The simulator may rely on assumptions that fail outside it
- A simulation prevents all reward loopholes
- Real observations always match simulated ones
- A delivery task has delayed payoffs: a longer route now may prevent a costly delay later. Why does a one-step reward view miss the trade-off?
- It assumes every action is random
- It cannot represent observations
- It ignores consequences that arrive in later states
- It forces rewards to be positive
- A team changes the reward from “deliver safely” to “deliver quickly” and sees faster but riskier behavior. What should it conclude?
- A faster policy proves the original safety objective was met
- The discount factor alone guarantees safe behavior
- Human preferences are unnecessary once training converges
- Reward design affects behavior, so safety must be represented and evaluated explicitly