AI for Archivists and Finding Aids

Archives preserve records and make them discoverable through collection descriptions, inventories, and finding aids. AI can generate OCR, transcribe handwriting, extract names and dates, summarize folders, or support semantic search. These tasks can expand access, especially across large collections, but machine outputs may misread names, erase historical terminology, or imply that a collection contains material not actually present. A finding aid is more than a summary: it conveys provenance, scope, arrangement, access conditions, and relationships among records. Archivists should verify descriptions against the collection and preserve uncertainty instead of converting guesses into facts. The National Archives distinguishes machine-generated text, such as OCR or AI, from human contributions in its catalog attribution guidance and provides public transcription workflows. Repositories can similarly label machine-generated text, maintain links to images, and invite corrections. Historical records may contain sensitive information or harmful language; archival staff should apply institutional description policies and explain context rather than silently rewriting the source. AI processing can also raise rights, privacy, and vendor data concerns. Evaluation should cover handwriting styles, languages, document condition, and names from the communities represented. AI may improve searchability and reduce repetitive work, but archivists retain responsibility for description, access, and preservation decisions. When a collection includes private or restricted records, automated descriptions should not expose sensitive personal details. Staff should document decisions and consult applicable access policies.