পরবর্তী আপপরবর্তী গাইড
EU AI Act Article 6 High-Risk Classification Rules
সমাজ
সোসাইটি গাইড
Annex III lists specified AI system uses considered high-risk under Article 6(2), across eight headings from biometrics and critical infrastructure to justice and democratic processes.
A sector label alone does not decide classification: the intended purpose, exact listed use, Article 6 exceptions, and transition dates matter.
Annex III of the EU AI Act lists specified AI system uses that are high-risk under Article 6(2). Its eight headings are biometrics; critical infrastructure; education and vocational training; employment and worker management; access to essential private or public services and benefits; law enforcement; migration, asylum and border management; and administration of justice and democratic processes. The list identifies particular intended uses rather than making every AI system in those sectors high-risk. Representative examples include certain remote biometric identification; school admission or learning-outcome evaluation; recruitment or worker-performance decisions; public-benefit eligibility and consumer creditworthiness; specified police evidence or risk assessment; and asylum, visa, judicial-assistance, or election-influence tools. Each Annex III point has its own actors, purpose, exceptions, and conditions. One-to-one biometric verification used only to confirm a person’s claimed identity is expressly excluded from the listed remote-identification category. Article 6(3) provides a narrow exception for an Annex III system that creates no significant risk and performs one of the specified limited functions, such as a narrow procedural task. A system that profiles natural persons remains high-risk under that paragraph. A provider concluding that a system is not high-risk must document the assessment and meet the applicable registration duty. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 changed the implementation calendar. The main Chapter III requirements for Article 6(2)/Annex III systems apply from December 2, 2027; the Article 6(1)/Annex I route applies from August 2, 2028. The amendment changed timing, not the Annex III headings. Check the consolidated Act and current guidance for a specific use. This guide is informational, not legal advice.
বিপর্যয়কর এবং দৈনন্দিন এআই ক্ষতি উভয়ই নির্ভর করে কে ঝুঁকি বুঝতে পারে এবং কে কাজ করতে পারে।
জনসাধারণের এবং পেশাদার সাক্ষরতা গঠন করে যে শক্তিশালী নিরাপত্তা নীতি রাজনৈতিকভাবে সম্ভব কিনা।
স্পষ্ট ব্যাখ্যা হাইপ, ল্যাব পিআর, এবং অস্পষ্ট নীতিশাস্ত্র থিয়েটার দ্বারা ক্যাপচার হ্রাস করে।
Annex III can be amended through delegated acts, and practical examples may change as the Commission issues guidance and authorities develop implementation practice. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 moved application dates but preserved the list’s role in classification. Monitor consolidated EUR-Lex text, Commission guidance, and national authority material before launch or a major change in intended use. Document the version and date of each classification decision. Track Commission delegated acts and guidance because Article 7 allows future adjustments to listed use cases under defined criteria.
A school checks whether an AI tool is used for admission, learning-outcome evaluation, education placement, or test monitoring instead of labeling every classroom tool high-risk.
An employer maps a system’s actual role in candidate screening, work allocation, or performance assessment to Annex III point 4.
A public benefits agency checks whether an AI system evaluates eligibility or helps grant, reduce, revoke, or reclaim an essential benefit under point 5(a).
A product team documents why its system’s intended purpose does or does not match a listed Annex III use and whether Article 6(3) can apply.
সক্ষমতা যৌগিক অবস্থায় অস্তিত্বগত ঝুঁকিকে সাই-ফাই হিসাবে বিবেচনা করা।
উচ্চ স্বায়ত্তশাসনের অধীনে প্রান্তিককরণের সাথে বিভ্রান্তিকর পৃষ্ঠ পণ্য নিরাপত্তা।
অ-ইংরেজি এবং অ-বিশেষজ্ঞ শ্রোতাদের শুধুমাত্র নিম্ন-মানের উত্স সহ ত্যাগ করা।
পৃথক পণ্য ক্ষতি, অপব্যবহার, এবং ক্ষতি-অব-নিয়ন্ত্রণ/বিভ্রান্তির ঝুঁকি।
জিজ্ঞাসা করুন কি প্রমাণ সময়সীমা এবং তীব্রতা আপনার দৃষ্টিভঙ্গি পরিবর্তন করবে.
বিপণন দাবির চেয়ে প্রাথমিক উত্স এবং কংক্রিট ইভাল পছন্দ করুন।
একটি কর্ম পথ চিহ্নিত করুন: কর্মজীবন, নীতি, অর্থায়ন, বা দক্ষতা - শুধুমাত্র সচেতনতা নয়।
Free newsletter
Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.
One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.
Test yourself
Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.
Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation
Annex III lists specified AI system uses considered high-risk under Article 6(2), across eight headings from biometrics and critical infrastructure to justice and democratic processes. A sector label alone does not decide classification: the intended purpose, exact listed use, Article 6 exceptions, and transition dates matter.
Annex III lists eight headings, each with more specific AI system uses.
Annex III point 3 includes AI systems intended to evaluate learning outcomes in educational and vocational training institutions.
Point 4 covers recruitment and selection, including filtering applications and evaluating candidates.
Point 5(a) includes specified public-authority systems evaluating eligibility for essential public assistance benefits and services.
Annex III lists specific intended uses; the sector label alone is not enough.
শিখতে থাকুন
এই বিষয়ের জন্য বাছাই করা আরও গাইড
পরবর্তী আপপরবর্তী গাইড
EU AI Act Article 6 High-Risk Classification Rules
সমাজ