গাইড লিঙ্ক ক্যুইজ · কঠিন স্তর
এআই বায়াস কুইজ
লেবেল, প্রক্সি, সাবগ্রুপ প্রমাণ, ন্যায্যতার মানদণ্ড, প্রভাবিত ব্যক্তি, কর্মপ্রবাহের সিদ্ধান্ত এবং চলমান পর্যালোচনার মাধ্যমে AI পক্ষপাতের মূল্যায়ন করুন।
প্রশ্ন 1 এর 8
Where can bias enter an AI system according to the guide?
প্রতিটি প্রশ্নের পূর্বরূপ দেখুন8 প্রশ্ন
আপনি কুইজ নেওয়ার সাথে সাথে উত্তর এবং ব্যাখ্যাগুলি উপস্থিত হয়।
- Where can bias enter an AI system according to the guide?
- Data, measurement, modeling choices, human judgments, and the surrounding workflow
- Only through a sensitive column
- Only through the user interface
- Only after a model is deployed
- Why can removing a sensitive attribute fail to eliminate bias?
- Sensitive attributes are always the only source
- Other features or historical labels may encode related patterns
- Removing columns guarantees fairness
- Model evaluation no longer needs groups
- A dataset’s label reflects a past human decision. What should the team ask?
- Whether the sensitive column was deleted
- Whether the label is easy to predict
- Whether the label captures the intended outcome or an old process
- Whether the model has enough layers
- Why report sample sizes and uncertainty for subgroup metrics?
- An average score is always sufficient
- Every subgroup has the same sample size
- Uncertainty makes group testing impossible
- Small groups can have unreliable estimates and averages can hide disparities
- Why can choosing one fairness criterion leave other concerns unresolved?
- One statistical criterion settles every legal concern
- Different criteria answer different questions and may conflict
- Any single metric guarantees fairness in every context
- Choosing a metric removes the need for affected-community input
- Who should help select fairness criteria for a consequential system?
- Only the engineering team
- Only the model vendor
- Domain experts and people affected by the system
- A language model without review
- Why review the workflow around a model?
- How predictions are used and challenged can change the distribution of harm
- The model output fully determines fairness
- Appeals cannot affect outcomes
- Workflow has no effect after training
- What should a team do after applying a bias mitigation?
- Hide subgroup results
- Assume the mitigation certifies fairness
- Stop monitoring
- Evaluate its intended effect and possible new problems