JAGORAN AL'UMMA

Amfani da Gaskiya da Bayanan Koyar da AI

Amfani da gaskiya shine koyaswar haƙƙin mallaka na Amurka da kotuna ke amfani da su don yanke shawara ko horar da ƙirar AI akan ayyukan haƙƙin mallaka ba tare da izini ba halal ne.

  • 4 min karatu
  • An sabunta ta ƙarshe
A wannan shafi4 min karatu
  1. Dubawa
  2. Zurfafa nutsewa
  3. Dabarun Tasiri
  4. Makomar Amfani da Gaskiya da Bayanan Koyar da AI
  5. Aiwatar da Gaskiyar Duniya
  6. Hatsari & Tsare-tsare
  7. Taswirar Hanya
  8. Ci gaba da Bincike
  9. Tambayoyin da ake yawan yi

Dubawa

Alƙalai suna auna abubuwa huɗu: manufar amfani, yanayin aikin, nawa aka kwafi, da tasirin kasuwa ga ainihin. Hukunce-hukuncen 2025 na farko sun rabu. An sami horon yana canzawa sosai a cikin wasu lamuran AI na ƙirƙira, yayin da ƴan fashi da makami da kwafi marasa ƙima suka jawo alhaki. Amsar ta shafi kowane mai haɓaka AI da kowane mahalicci wanda aikinsa yake cikin bayanan horo.

Zurfafa nutsewa

Sashe na 107 na Dokar Haƙƙin mallaka ya lissafa abubuwa huɗu. Factor daya tambaya ko amfani yana canzawa da kasuwanci. Hukuncin Kotun Koli na 2023 Warhol v. Goldsmith ya jaddada cewa wata manufa ta daban tana da mahimmanci fiye da ƙara sabon ma'ana. Factor na biyu yayi la'akari ko aikin ƙirƙira ne ko na gaskiya. Factor three ya dubi nawa aka dauka. Factor Four yana tambaya ko amfani yana cutar da kasuwa don ainihin, kuma sau da yawa kotuna suna ɗaukar shi a matsayin mafi mahimmanci. Hukunce-hukuncen farko sun zo ne a cikin 2025. A watan Fabrairu, alkali Stephanos Bibas ya gudanar a Thomson Reuters v. Ross cewa kwafin da Ross ya yi na Westlaw na kanun labarai don horar da kayan aikin bincike na doka bai dace ba. Ross yana gina mai fafatawa kai tsaye, kuma AI ba ta haifar ba. Shari’ar dai ta kai ga Kotun Koli ta Uku kan daukaka kara. A watan Yuni, alkali William Alsup ya yanke hukunci a Bartz v. Anthropic cewa horar da littattafai ya kasance 'mai matukar canzawa' da amfani mai kyau, kuma binciken littattafan da aka saya shima yayi adalci. Ya yi imanin cewa gina babban ɗakin karatu daga wuraren ƴan fashin teku wani amfani ne na daban wanda amfani da gaskiya bai rufe ba. Bayan takardar shedar aji, Anthropic ta amince da wani sulhu da aka bayar da rahoton akan dala biliyan 1.5, kusan dala 3,000 a kowane aikin da aka rufe. Kwanaki daga baya, Alkali Vince Chhabria ya yanke hukunci ga Meta a Kadrey v. Meta, amma saboda marubutan ba su samar da shaidar cutar da kasuwa ba. Ya jaddada cewa 'dilution kasuwa' daga ambaliya na AI-fillar ayyukan gasa zai iya yin nauyi sosai da yin amfani da adalci a cikin mafi kyawun gardama. Kuskure na gama gari shine kotuna sun ayyana amfani da adalci na horar da AI a duk faɗin hukumar. Waɗannan hukunce-hukuncen kotunan yanki ne kan takamaiman hujjoji. Roko, wasu lokuta da kuma hanyar samun bayanai duk al'amura.

Dabarun Tasiri

Haɗari da aminci

Bala'i da cutar AI ta yau da kullun duka sun dogara da wanda ya fahimci haɗarin kuma wanda zai iya yin aiki.

Shawarwari masu haske

Ilimin jama'a da na ƙwararru yana siffanta ko ƙaƙƙarfan manufofin aminci na yiwuwa a siyasance.

Yanke ta hanyar yayatawa

Bayyanar bayani yana rage kama ta hanyar zage-zage, dakin gwaje-gwaje PR, da gidan wasan kwaikwayo mara kyau.

Makomar Amfani da Gaskiya da Bayanan Koyar da AI

Hukunce-hukuncen daukaka kara, gami da bita na zagaye na uku na Thomson Reuters v. Ross, mai yuwuwa su tsara koyaswar fiye da kowane hukuncin gwaji guda. Yi tsammanin kotuna za su ci gaba da raba yadda aka samu bayanai da yadda aka yi amfani da su, da kuma duba da kyau kan shaidar cutar da kasuwa. Yarjejeniyar lasisi tabbas za ta ci gaba da girma, tunda suna rage haɗarin doka ba tare da la'akari da sakamako ba. Majalisa na iya yin doka, kuma Ofishin haƙƙin mallaka ya buga nasa bincike game da horarwar AI. Har sai lokacin dokar ta kasance ba ta daidaita ba kuma ta dogara da gaskiyar kowane lamari.

Aiwatar da Gaskiyar Duniya

A cikin Bartz v. Anthropic, wani alkali ya sami horar da Claude akan littattafan da aka siya da na'urar tantancewa ya yi daidai da amfani, amma saukar da miliyoyin litattafai masu fashi a cikin ɗakin karatu ba a ba su uzuri ba.

A cikin Thomson Reuters da Ross Intelligence, kotu ta ƙi yin amfani da gaskiya don fara binciken shari'a wanda ya yi amfani da rubutun Westlaw don gina gasa, kayan aikin bincike mara ƙima.

A cikin Kadrey v. Meta, marubuta sun yi hasarar a taƙaitaccen hukunci saboda ba su tabbatar da cutar da kasuwa ba, ko da yake alkali ya nuna irin wannan cutar zai iya kasancewa a wasu lokuta.

Mawallafin labarai sun sanya hannu kan yarjejeniyar lasisi da aka biya tare da kamfanin AI, wanda duka ke samun kudaden shiga kuma yana goyan bayan hujjar cewa akwai kasuwar lasisin horo.

Hatsari & Tsare-tsare

  • Magance haɗarin wanzuwa azaman sci-fi yayin da abubuwan iyawa.

  • Amintaccen samfur mai ruɗani tare da jeri ƙarƙashin babban ikon kai.

  • Barin waɗanda ba Ingilishi ba da ƙwararrun masu sauraro tare da tushe masu ƙarancin inganci kawai.

Taswirar Hanya

  1. Rarrabe lahani na samfur, rashin amfani, da hasarar sarrafa-haɗari / rashin daidaituwa.

  2. Tambayi wane shaida zai canza ra'ayin ku akan jerin lokuta da tsanani.

  3. Fi son tushe na farko da tabbataccen kimantawa akan da'awar tallace-tallace.

  4. Gano hanyar aiki ɗaya: aiki, manufa, kuɗi, ko ƙwarewa - ba kawai sani ba.

Ci gaba da Bincike

Free newsletter

Get the daily AI briefing

Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.

One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.

Test yourself

Take the Fair Use and AI Training Data quiz

Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.

Fara tambayoyi

Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation

Tambayoyin da ake yawan yi

Menene Amfani da Gaskiya da Bayanan Koyar da AI?

Amfani da gaskiya shine koyaswar haƙƙin mallaka na Amurka da kotuna ke amfani da su don yanke shawara ko horar da ƙirar AI akan ayyukan haƙƙin mallaka ba tare da izini ba halal ne. Alƙalai suna auna abubuwa huɗu: manufar amfani, yanayin aikin, nawa aka kwafi, da tasirin kasuwa ga ainihin. Hukunce-hukuncen 2025 na farko sun rabu. An sami horon yana canzawa sosai a cikin wasu lamuran AI na ƙirƙira, yayin da ƴan fashi da makami da kwafi marasa ƙima suka jawo alhaki. Amsar ta shafi kowane mai haɓaka AI da kowane mahalicci wanda aikinsa yake cikin bayanan horo.

Wanne fa'idar amfani da gaskiya yayi tambaya game da cutar da kasuwa don ainihin aikin?

Factor four yayi la'akari da tasiri akan yuwuwar kasuwa don ko ƙimar asali, kuma sau da yawa kotuna suna ɗaukarsa a matsayin mafi mahimmanci.

Me yasa kotu ta ki yin amfani da adalci a Thomson Reuters v. Ross Intelligence?

Alkalin kotun Bibas ya gano cewa amfani da Ross bai isa ba kuma ya yi aiki a matsayin madadin kasuwa kai tsaye ga Westlaw.

A cikin Bartz v. Anthropic, menene alkali Alsup ya gano ba a rufe shi da adalci ba?

Alsup ya gudanar da horarwa da duba littattafan da aka siya ta hanyar doka, an yi amfani da su daidai, amma samun da adana litattafan fashi a cikin ɗakin karatu daban ne, rashin uzuri.

Wane sulhu ne Anthropic ya cimma a Bartz, kamar yadda aka ruwaito?

Bayan takardar shedar aji, yarjejeniyar da aka bayar ta kasance kusan dala biliyan 1.5, kusan dala 3,000 ga kowane aikin da aka rufe.

Me yasa Meta yayi nasara a Kadrey v. Meta?

Mai shari'a Chhabria ta yanke hukunci a daki-daki saboda masu shigar da kara sun kasa nuna barnar kasuwa, yayin da suka nuna cewa shari'ar da ta fi dacewa za ta iya yin nasara.