Komawa Labarai
TsaroAI Understanding takaitaccen bayani

Meta na fuskantar shari'a game da girbin hoto da tantance fuska

Punjab Kesari Turanci ya ba da rahoton cewa iyaye da yara suna zargin Meta da yin amfani da hotuna Facebook da Instagram don horar da AI da tsarin gane fuska da ba a saki ba.

4 min readRead the linked source
Source-provided image accompanying Meta faces lawsuit over photo harvesting and facial recognition
Tushen tusheAn rubuta tushen tushe
Mawallafi
english.punjabkesari.com
Tushen hanyar haɗin gwiwa
english.punjabkesari.comhttps://english.punjabkesari.com/us-news/meta/
Nau'in tushe
Tushen da aka haɗa - ba a kafa matsayin tushen farko ba.
MaganaFahimtar wannan a cikin daƙiƙa 60

Fara a nan

Mabuɗin sharuddan

AI mai ƙirƙira
Tsarin AI waɗanda ke samar da sabon abun ciki kamar rubutu, hotuna, sauti, bidiyo, ko lamba.
Gwada kankaAI Ethics Quiz

Me ya faru

Punjab Kesari Turanci ya ba da rahoton cewa iyalai a Illinois da California sun shigar da ƙarar matakin matakin tarayya na zargin Meta ya girbe miliyoyin hotuna Facebook da Instagram ba tare da isasshen izini ba. Rahoton ya ce korafin ya danganta da zargin amfani da bayanan da aka yi amfani da su zuwa nau'ikan AI da kuma tsarin tantance fuska da ba a fito da shi ba da ake kira NameTag, wanda aka kera don tauraro mai wayo na Meta.

Punjab Kesari Turanci ta ba da rahoton cewa iyaye da yara a fadin Illinois da California sun shigar da karar matakin matakin tarayya suna zargin Meta da tattara miliyoyin hotuna ba bisa ka'ida ba daga Facebook da Instagram. Kamar yadda aka bayyana ta hanyar hanyar, masu shigar da kara sun yi zargin cewa Meta ya yi amfani da hotunan don horar da tsarin AI, gami da Emu da Hoton Muse, yayin da ake fitar da bayanan biometric da masu gano sirri ba tare da isasshen sanarwa ko izini ba. Rahoton ya ce zargin yin amfani da abun ciki ya samo asali ne tun watan Satumban 2021.

Rahoton ya bayyana NameTag a matsayin babban ɓangare na zargin. Punjab Kesari Turanci ya ce kayan aikin da ba a sake shi ba an yi niyya ne don yin aiki tare da Ray-Ban na Meta na Ray-Ban da Oakley smart glasses, suna mai da bidiyon da aka ɗauka na fuskoki zuwa sa hannu na biometric tare da daidaita su da bayanan bayanan da ke da alaƙa da asusun kafofin watsa labarun jama'a. Fitar ta ce an gano NameTag ta hanyar lamba mai aiki a cikin aikace-aikacen abokin abokin AI na Meta. Meta ya ki amincewa da zarge-zargen, bisa ga rahoton, kuma ya ce NameTag bai taba aikawa zuwa ga masu siye ba kuma ba a yanke shawara ta ƙarshe ta kasuwanci ba. Ba a tabbatar da waɗannan ikirari da kansa daga tushen abin ba.

Bayanan tushe: english.punjabkesari.com ↗

Me ya sa yake da mahimmanci

Shari'ar da aka ruwaito ta haɗu da tambayoyi guda biyu masu tasiri: ko za a iya amfani da hotunan kafofin watsa labarun don haɓaka tsarin AI a ƙarƙashin izinin da ake ciki da kuma ka'idodin sirrin halittu, da kuma ko na'urorin AI masu sawa za su iya gano mutane a cikin jama'a ba tare da saninsu ba. Zargin ya kasance ba a tabbatar da shi ba, kuma majiyar ba ta tabbatar da ikirarin koke da kanta ba ko bayar da shigar da karar kotu, zanga-zangar fasaha, ko shaidar cewa an tura NameTag.

Idan an tabbatar da zargin, shari'ar na iya gwada yadda dokokin sirri-biometric ke aiki lokacin da aka sake yin amfani da hotunan kafofin watsa labarun don haɓaka samfuri da tsarin ainihi. Hakanan yana tayar da batun sirri mai amfani don AI mai sawa: tsarin da zai iya gano mutane daga bidiyon da aka ɗauka na iya shafar masu kallo waɗanda ba su taɓa yarda a yi rikodin ko tantance su ba.

Rahoton bai tabbatar da cewa NameTag ya isa ga masu amfani ba, cewa ya gano kowa a cikin amfani na zahiri, ko kuma samfuran AI na Meta an horar da su ba bisa ka'ida ba. Hakanan baya bayar da gwaji mai zaman kansa, cikakkun da'awar shari'a na ƙarar, ko takamaiman asusun wanda aka yi amfani da hotuna ko bayanan bayanan halitta. Wadannan iyakokin suna da mahimmanci saboda zargin da ake yi na karar ba binciken da kotu ta yi ba ne.

Interactive Mechanism

Ingantacciyar hanyar sadarwa: Yadda A zahiri yake Aiki

Bincika fasahar da ke bayan wannan ci gaban ta hanyar mu'amala.

Agent Lifecycle Stage:
1
User Intent & Planning: "Audit customer refund request #4092 and settle payment."
2
Tool Calling: Emits structured JSON call crm_get_transaction(id='4092').
3
Guardrail & Verification:🛡️ Paused: High-value action requires human operator sign-off.
4
Final Settlement: Refund recorded, email receipt dispatched, and audit log stored.
Core takeaway: An AI agent is not just a language model—it is a closed loop of planning, tool invocation, and environment feedback. Production systems require self-healing retries and strict human approval guardrails.
Duba ra'ayi na hulɗa+10 Points
AI Ethics Quiz

Why can ethical evaluation not be reduced to one model score?

Abin kallo na gaba

Mahimman abubuwan ci gaba sun haɗa da martanin Meta a kotu, ko an tabbatar da shari'ar a matsayin mataki na aji, da duk wani hukunci game da zarge-zargen koyar da ilimin halittu da AI. Rahoton ya ce NameTag bai yi jigilar kaya ba kuma Meta bai yanke shawarar kasuwanci ta ƙarshe game da shi ba. Babu sharuddan shiga ko farashi da aka rubuta.

Kula da takardar ƙarar, cikakkiyar ƙararrakin, kowane yanke shawara kan takaddun shaida, da kuma shigar da ƙarar doka ta Meta. Waɗancan kayan za su iya fayyace masu ƙara, hukunce-hukuncen, bayanan da abin ya shafa, da magunguna da ake buƙata, da takamaiman ƙa'idodin yanayin halittu na jihar da ke fitowa.

Duba kuma don shaida game da matsayin ci gaban NameTag da kwararar bayanai. Rahoton bai tabbatar da ko tsarin ya ci gaba da kasancewa a cikin ci gaba mai aiki ba, yadda za a cika duk wani bayanan da ya dace, ko Meta ya saita yanayin ƙaddamarwa, samuwa, ko farashi. Ci gaban da aka ruwaito nan da nan shine ƙarar da Meta ta musun, ba sakin samfurin mabukaci ba.

Jagorori masu alaƙa & tambayoyin tambayoyi

Ɗa'a ta AIAI Model ya bayyanaWakilan AIGwada abin da kuka sani - gwada gwajin AI kyautaNemo kalmar AI a cikin ƙamus ɗin muBi tsarin tsarin AI
An sami wannan yana da amfani?