Komawa Labarai
SiyasaAI Understanding takaitaccen bayani

Seattle Times da Newsday sun kai karar OpenAI da Microsoft kan horar da AI

Jaridun sun yi zargin cewa OpenAI da Microsoft sun yi amfani da aikin jarida wajen horarwa da sarrafa kayayyakin AI ba tare da izini ba.

4 min readRead the original reporting
Source-provided image accompanying Seattle Times and Newsday sue OpenAI and Microsoft over AI training
Rahoton da aka dangantaAn rubuta tushen tushe
Mawallafi
straitstimes.com
Tushen hanyar haɗin gwiwa
straitstimes.comhttps://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/seattle-times-newsday-sue-openai-microsoft-alleging-copyright-infringement
Nau'in tushe
Rahoto ta hanyar tashar labarai - ba daftarin aiki na ɓangare na farko ba.

Abin da ba mu iya tabbatarwa da kansa ba: An dangana wannan da'awar ga kanti mai suna. Ba mu tabbatar da shi a kan takardar jam'iyyar farko ba. (straitstimes.com)

MaganaFahimtar wannan a cikin daƙiƙa 60

Fara a nan

Mabuɗin sharuddan

AI mai ƙirƙira
Tsarin AI waɗanda ke samar da sabon abun ciki kamar rubutu, hotuna, sauti, bidiyo, ko lamba.
Gwada kankaAI Ethics Quiz

Me ya faru

The Straits Times, citing Reuters, reported that The Seattle Times and Newsday filed a federal copyright lawsuit on Sept. 4 against OpenAI and Microsoft. The newspapers allege that the companies scraped their websites, including paywalled material, and used the articles in datasets supporting products such as ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot and Bing’s AI features.

The Straits Times reported that The Seattle Times and Newsday sued OpenAI and Microsoft in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on Sept. 4. The newspapers allege that the companies copied their journalism without permission to train AI systems.

According to the report, the complaint alleges that OpenAI and Microsoft scraped both newspapers’ websites, including content behind paywalls, and incorporated the material into datasets used to train and operate ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot and Bing AI features.

The newspapers also allege that the products can reproduce passages from their reporting, closely paraphrase articles and answer questions in ways that reduce users’ need to visit their websites or purchase subscriptions. The report does not independently confirm those alleged behaviors or the contents of the datasets.

The plaintiffs are seeking an order requiring the destruction of copies of their works, as well as training datasets or AI models that incorporate them. OpenAI said its models are trained on publicly available data and grounded in fair use, while Microsoft said it values local journalism and is open to discussing solutions.

Bayanan tushe: straitstimes.com ↗

Me ya sa yake da mahimmanci

The case adds two major newspaper publishers to the growing legal challenge over whether AI companies can use copyrighted journalism to train and operate systems. It could affect how publishers protect paywalled reporting, negotiate licensing and respond when AI products summarize or reproduce news without sending readers to the original source.

The lawsuit directly tests a central dispute in : whether copying news articles into training systems and generating responses based on that material is protected by fair use or requires permission and compensation. The outcome could influence publishers beyond these two newspapers.

For news organizations, the alleged ability of AI products to reproduce or closely paraphrase reporting raises both copyright and business concerns. If users receive useful answers without visiting the original publication, publishers may face pressure on subscriptions, advertising and referral traffic.

The case also broadens the litigation landscape beyond the New York Times’ previously reported lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. However, this is described as a separate case, and its legal merits and likely outcome are not established by the filing or by the report alone.

Interactive Mechanism

Ingantacciyar hanyar sadarwa: Yadda A zahiri yake Aiki

Bincika fasahar da ke bayan wannan ci gaban ta hanyar mu'amala.

System Requirements:
Best ArchitecturePure RAGRecommended pattern
Hallucination RiskVery LowGrounding efficacy
Update Cost$0 (Vector sync)Ongoing maintenance
Core takeaway: Fine-tuning teaches models how to speak (form, style, syntax); RAG teaches models what to say (verifiable facts). Never use fine-tuning alone for factual memory.
Duba ra'ayi na hulɗa+10 Points
AI Ethics Quiz

Why can ethical evaluation not be reduced to one model score?

Abin kallo na gaba

The case is at the allegation stage. Key unknowns include what evidence the newspapers will present about scraping, training-data use and product outputs, whether the court accepts the fair-use arguments, and whether the parties pursue licensing or another settlement.

Watch for OpenAI and Microsoft’s formal court filings, including their responses to the scraping, paywall, training-data and output allegations. The companies’ initial public comments do not resolve those factual disputes.

The complaint’s requested destruction of works, datasets and models could create difficult questions about how courts would identify and remediate copyrighted material embedded in complex AI systems.

The report does not document damages, a settlement, a licensing proposal, a ruling on fair use or any confirmed change to ChatGPT, Copilot or Bing. It also does not independently verify that the newspapers’ content is present in particular datasets or models.

Jagorori masu alaƙa & tambayoyin tambayoyi

Ɗa'a ta AIChatGPT da LLMAI horoGwada abin da kuka sani - gwada gwajin AI kyautaNemo kalmar AI a cikin ƙamus ɗin muBi tsarin tsarin AI
An sami wannan yana da amfani?