Társadalom ÚTMUTATÓ

EU AI Act Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices

Article 5 of the EU AI Act prohibits specified AI practices, each defined by its purpose, context, threshold, and exceptions.

  • 3 perc olvasás
  • Utoljára frissítve
Ezen az oldalon3 perc olvasás
  1. Áttekintés
  2. Mély merülés
  3. Stratégiai hatás
  4. The Future of EU AI Act Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices
  5. Valós megvalósítás
  6. Kockázatok és védőkorlátok
  7. Végrehajtási ütemterv
  8. Folytassa a felfedezést
  9. Gyakran ismételt kérdések

Áttekintés

Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 added two prohibitions for certain nonconsensual intimate material and child sexual abuse material, which apply from December 2, 2026 rather than the original February 2025 date.

Mély merülés

Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 lists prohibited AI practices. The original points (a) through (h), applicable since February 2, 2025, address specified harmful manipulation or deception; exploitation of defined vulnerabilities; social scoring that leads to harmful treatment; crime-risk assessments based solely on profiling or personality traits; untargeted facial-image scraping for recognition databases; emotion inference at work or in education except for medical or safety purposes; biometric categorisation to infer listed sensitive traits; and most real-time remote biometric identification by law enforcement in public spaces. Each rule has its own elements and exceptions. Article 5 does not ban every tool used in these areas. Its specific thresholds matter: points (a), (d), and (h), for example, define harm conditions, an evidential exception, and authorization safeguards. Other EU or national laws may still apply. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, published in July 2026 and in force, inserted points (ba) and (bb). They address systems generating or manipulating realistic intimate or sexually explicit material of an identifiable person without explicit consent, and certain child sexual abuse material. The amendment also specifies provider and deployer conditions and safeguards; it does not make every general-purpose image or audio model prohibited. These two points and related paragraphs 1a and 1b apply from December 2, 2026, so they are enacted but not yet applicable on September 26, 2026. For a real assessment, map the system, actor, intended purpose, output, affected person, relevant Article 5 point, thresholds, and exceptions. Article 5 is not the Act’s high-risk classification test, and it is not an exhaustive list of every unlawful AI use. Check the current consolidated text and other applicable law. This guide is informational, not legal advice.

Stratégiai hatás

Kockázat és biztonság

A katasztrofális és a mindennapi mesterséges intelligencia okozta károk egyaránt attól függnek, hogy ki érti a kockázatokat, és ki tud cselekedni.

Tisztább döntések

A közéleti és szakmai műveltség határozza meg, hogy politikailag lehetséges-e az erős biztonsági politika.

Átvágva a felhajtáson

A világos magyarázatok csökkentik a hírverés, a laboratóriumi PR és a homályos etikai színház általi elkapását.

The Future of EU AI Act Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices

Article 5 can change through amendments, delegated acts, and court or authority interpretation. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 already adds two new prohibited practices, with application beginning December 2, 2026. Teams should update controls before that date and review the current official text for further amendments. Interpret every rule by its full elements and exceptions rather than relying on a short list or general description of an AI technique. Add a pre-release check ahead of December 2, 2026 for the new Article 5 points, then monitor official amendments and guidance.

Valós megvalósítás

A product team checks whether a proposed behavioral intervention meets Article 5’s significant-harm and material-distortion conditions instead of treating all persuasive design as prohibited manipulation.

A public body separates the ban on certain emotion inference at work or in education from other permitted uses and the medical or safety exception.

A face-search developer checks whether images are being scraped without targeting from internet or CCTV sources to create or expand a facial-recognition database.

A model provider reviews whether safeguards can prevent reasonably foreseeable and reproducible generation of newly prohibited material before placing a system on the market.

Kockázatok és védőkorlátok

  • Az egzisztenciális kockázat sci-fiként való kezelése, miközben a képesség összetett.

  • Zavaros felületi termékbiztonság a nagy autonómia melletti igazítással.

  • A nem angol nyelvű és nem szakértő közönségnek csak rossz minőségű forrásokat kell hagynia.

Végrehajtási ütemterv

  1. Különítse el a termékkárok, a visszaélések és az ellenőrzés elvesztésének/hibás beállításának kockázatait.

  2. Kérdezd meg, milyen bizonyítékok változtatnák meg az idővonalakról és a súlyosságról alkotott nézetedet.

  3. Részesítse előnyben az elsődleges forrásokat és a konkrét értékeléseket a marketinges állításokkal szemben.

  4. Határozzon meg egy cselekvési utat: karrier, politika, finanszírozás vagy készségek – nem csak a tudatosság.

Folytassa a felfedezést

Free newsletter

Get the daily AI briefing

Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.

One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.

Test yourself

Take the EU AI Act Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices quiz

Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.

Kezdő kvíz

Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation

Gyakran ismételt kérdések

What is EU AI Act Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices?

Article 5 of the EU AI Act prohibits specified AI practices, each defined by its purpose, context, threshold, and exceptions. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 added two prohibitions for certain nonconsensual intimate material and child sexual abuse material, which apply from December 2, 2026 rather than the original February 2025 date.

Which feature is required for the manipulation prohibition in Article 5(1)(a)?

Point (a) requires the specified material distortion and significant-harm conditions; it does not prohibit every persuasive technique.

Which description best captures the social-scoring prohibition in Article 5?

Point (c) requires evaluation or classification over time based on behavior or traits and a specified kind of adverse treatment.

What kind of crime-risk assessment is covered by Article 5(1)(d)?

Point (d) targets crime-risk assessment based solely on profiling or personality traits and provides a defined exception tied to objective, verifiable facts.

Which facial-image practice does Article 5(1)(e) prohibit?

Point (e) concerns untargeted scraping of face images from the internet or CCTV for facial-recognition databases.

When does Article 5(1)(f) prohibit emotion inference?

Point (f) concerns inferring emotion in work and education settings, with medical or safety exceptions.