사내 변호사를 위한 AI

Corporate legal departments handle a steady stream of repeat work: NDAs, vendor agreements, exceptions to standard sales terms, marketing reviews, policy questions and employment matters. Each item is usually low risk, but together they add up to a large volume, and they arrive through email and chat with little structure. AI is being applied at three points in that flow. The first is intake and triage. An AI front door can collect the facts a lawyer needs, classify the request, answer questions that existing policy already covers, and route the rest to the right person with a summary. This works best when the underlying knowledge base of approved positions and FAQs is current and has a named owner. The second is contract triage. NDAs are the usual starting point because they are standardized. A playbook defines acceptable positions on the term, the definition of confidential information, residuals, non-solicitation, governing law and remedies. The AI compares each incoming NDA against the playbook, proposes redlines to fallback positions and scores whether it can be approved without a lawyer. Contract lifecycle management platforms such as Ironclad and Icertis are used this way, as are general legal assistants such as Harvey or Microsoft Copilot set up with playbooks. The third is legal operations metrics. Departments track matter volume, cycle time, outside counsel spend and the share of work handled through self-service. Where requests and invoices were never tagged cleanly, AI can classify the history to produce these numbers. The Corporate Legal Operations Consortium (CLOC) has helped standardize this discipline. Some expect AI to let the business bypass legal entirely. In practice, the gains come from clear playbooks and escalation rules. Without them, automated approvals just move risk faster. Departments should also settle questions about confidentiality, data residency and whether AI-assisted communications stay privileged, working with their IT and security teams.