Test legat de ghid · Greu Nivel
Test de etică AI
Testele au afectat oamenii, principiile acționabile, responsabilitatea, autoritatea umană semnificativă, alternativele, revizuirea continuă și riscul rezidual.
Întrebare 1 de 8
De ce evaluarea etică nu poate fi redusă la un punctaj model?
Previzualizează fiecare întrebare8 întrebări
Răspunsurile și explicațiile apar pe măsură ce susțineți testul.
- De ce evaluarea etică nu poate fi redusă la un punctaj model?
- Scorurile nu sunt niciodată utile
- Depinde de scop, de persoanele afectate, de compromisuri și de distribuția daunelor
- Etica se referă doar la respectarea legii
- Un scor mare dovedește corectitudinea
- A service is convenient for its operator but burdens people who cannot opt out. What should an ethical review ask?
- Who benefits, bears extra work, and has influence over the design
- Only whether the interface is fast
- Whether the model is open-weight
- How many features can be automated
- A team says transparency is important. What would make the principle actionable?
- Add “transparent” to the product description
- Publish the model’s parameter count
- Ask the model to explain itself
- Specify what information users need and when they receive it
- Why is human involvement not automatically an ethical safeguard?
- Humans cannot find model errors
- Human review always makes systems slower
- Reviewers need relevant authority and resources to affect outcomes
- Automation is always more ethical
- What should an accountability process identify?
- Who can investigate, correct, or stop an inappropriate outcome
- Only the vendor’s contact form
- A model’s confidence score
- The number of review meetings
- When should an ethical review be revisited?
- Only before procurement
- After deployment as uses, data, or feedback change
- Only when the model architecture changes
- Never after approval
- A simpler non-AI process can meet the same need with fewer burdens. What should the team do?
- Choose AI because it is innovative
- Ignore staffing and procedure options
- Compare the alternative instead of assuming more automation is better
- Keep the model but remove user feedback
- How should a review report handle disagreement and remaining risk?
- Remove disagreement from the record
- Describe the review as a safety guarantee
- Record only risks the model can measure
- Document both rather than claiming review proves no harm can occur