Test legat de ghid · Mediu Nivel

Test pentru atacuri cu injecție promptă

Review instruction trust boundaries and indirect injection, with tool containment, hierarchy training, task disruption, and multimodal input risks.

Căi de ghidare aferenteAtacurile cu injecție promptă
Întrebare 1 de 8

Which trust failure can a prompt-injection attempt exploit?

Previzualizează fiecare întrebare8 întrebări

Răspunsurile și explicațiile apar pe măsură ce susțineți testul.

  1. Which trust failure can a prompt-injection attempt exploit?
    • Adversarial instructions in task material being followed as authoritative commands
    • A requirement that every model encrypt its entire context
    • A guarantee that all models have administrator privileges
    • A requirement that every model always obey every input
  2. Cum diferă injecția INDIRECTA promptă de injecția directă?
    • Funcționează doar pe modele de imagine
    • Necesită acces fizic la server
    • Instrucțiunile rău intenționate trăiesc într-o sursă externă pe care modelul o citește ulterior, nu în propriul mesaj al utilizatorului
    • Este realizat de dezvoltator intenționat
  3. Which availability goal does the cited indirect-injection taxonomy include?
    • Only stealing an entire training corpus in every attack
    • Inhibiting useful responses or disrupting a search task
    • Only changing a GPU’s physical memory size
    • Only improving all authorized search results
  4. How can least-privilege tool permissions limit a successful injection’s consequences?
    • They prove every allowed operation is harmless in every context
    • They guarantee the model never proposes an injected action
    • They remove the need for any output or action validation
    • They restrict the operations and resources available to the workflow
  5. What behavior does the Instruction Hierarchy study aim to train?
    • Sorting all retrieved words alphabetically
    • Treating every webpage as more authoritative than the developer
    • Following privileged instructions over conflicting lower-priority content
    • Encrypting the model vocabulary with an image key
  6. De ce injectarea promptă devine mai periculoasă pe măsură ce agenții AI obțin instrumente?
    • Un agent păcălit poate acum să întreprindă acțiuni reale, cum ar fi trimiterea de e-mailuri, rularea codului sau scurgerea de date
    • Agenții rulează mai încet cu instrumente
    • Instrumentele fac modelul să uite de pregătire
    • Instrumentele dublează nedumerirea modelului
  7. Why should a prompt-injection evaluation cover images when an application accepts multimodal input?
    • Images guarantee that all instructions are trustworthy
    • An image can contain only one numerical scalar
    • Plain-text testing automatically covers every image input
    • Adversarial instructions can be embedded in an image channel
  8. Why is merely quoting an attack instruction not enough to establish that an application was compromised?
    • Every quoted string necessarily changes system permissions
    • The text may be legitimate analysis material and may never be executed as an instruction
    • An attacker must modify all original model weights first
    • No authorized user can ever discuss a security attack