Dzokera kuNhau
ChengetedzoAI Understanding muchidimbu

Vatsvakurudzi Vanoshandisa Anthropic's Claude AI kuHack OpenAI ChatGPT Account yemushandi.

Vaongorori vekuchengetedza vakashandisa Anthropic's Claude Opus 5 kubira OpenAI ChatGPT yemushandi account uye kusvika mukati mekambani GitHub nharaunda.

4 min readRead the original reporting
Source-provided image accompanying Researchers Use Anthropic's Claude AI to Hack OpenAI Employee's ChatGPT Account
Attributed reportingKwakanyorwa
Muparidzi
venturebeat.com
Source link
venturebeat.comhttps://venturebeat.com/security/openai-hacked-by-small-team-of-white-hat-security-researchers-using-anthropics-claude-opus-5
Source type
Kuburitswa nenhau - kwete gwaro rebato rekutanga.

Zvatisina kukwanisa kuzvisimbisa takazvimirira: Chirevo ichi chinoverengerwa kune yakapihwa zita. Hatina kuzvisimbisa negwaro rebato rekutanga. (venturebeat.com)

ContextNzwisisa izvi mumasekonzi makumi matanhatu

Tanga pano

Zviedze iwe pachakoAI Agents Quiz

Chii chaitika

Security researchers from Hacktron AI used Anthropic's Claude Opus 5 to hack an OpenAI employee's ChatGPT account and reach the company's internal GitHub environment. The researchers discovered a vulnerability in OpenAI's single sign-on implementation that allowed them to turn control of the forum environment into access to ChatGPT and Codex accounts belonging to users who had authenticated through the service. They then used the compromised employee account's access to Codex to create a harmless pull request in OpenAI's internal monorepo, demonstrating that the account compromise could extend beyond ChatGPT itself into connected developer infrastructure.

The researchers used Anthropic's Claude Opus 5 to investigate the vulnerable libheif package and develop an exploit.

They initially used Claude Opus 4.8 but switched to Opus 5, which produced a working ARM64 exploit within hours.

The researchers then adapted the exploit to the x86-64 and jemalloc environment used by Discourse.

The full path from discovery to access to OpenAI's repository environment took less than 72 hours.

The researchers reported the findings through OpenAI's Bugcrowd program on July 25 and received a payout of $6,500.

Kwakabva mashoko: venturebeat.com ↗

Nei zvichikosha

This incident highlights the risks associated with AI agents connected to business systems and the importance of isolating untrusted file-processing pipelines, keeping low-level dependencies aggressively patched, constraining federated identity trust, and treating AI-agent credentials with the same scrutiny as privileged human accounts.

The incident highlights the risks associated with AI agents connected to business systems.

It demonstrates how AI coding agents are changing the economics of sophisticated vulnerability exploitation.

The researchers argue that frontier coding agents can increasingly perform much of the incremental exploit-development work under human direction.

The broader libheif ecosystem reinforces the maintenance problem, with dozens of security advisories published during 2026.

The incident emphasizes the need for organizations to take a more proactive approach to security, including isolating untrusted file-processing pipelines, keeping low-level dependencies aggressively patched, constraining federated identity trust, and treating AI-agent credentials with the same scrutiny as privileged human accounts.

Interactive Mechanism

Interactive Mechanism: Iyo Inonyatsoshanda

Ongorora ari pasi tekinoroji kuseri kwekusimudzira uku uchipindirana.

Agent Lifecycle Stage:
1
User Intent & Planning: "Audit customer refund request #4092 and settle payment."
2
Tool Calling: Emits structured JSON call crm_get_transaction(id='4092').
3
Guardrail & Verification:🛡️ Paused: High-value action requires human operator sign-off.
4
Final Settlement: Refund recorded, email receipt dispatched, and audit log stored.
Core takeaway: An AI agent is not just a language model—it is a closed loop of planning, tool invocation, and environment feedback. Production systems require self-healing retries and strict human approval guardrails.
Interactive Concept Check+10 Points
AI Agents Quiz

An agent must create a draft calendar event for Tuesday at 2 p.m. Which evidence would establish the requested result?

Zvekutarisa zvinotevera

The incident demonstrates how AI coding agents are changing the economics of sophisticated vulnerability exploitation and the need for organizations to take a more proactive approach to security.

The incident demonstrates the potential impact of AI agents on security.

It highlights the need for organizations to take a more proactive approach to security.

The researchers argue that AI coding agents are changing the economics of sophisticated vulnerability exploitation.

The incident emphasizes the importance of isolating untrusted file-processing pipelines and keeping low-level dependencies aggressively patched.

The researchers note that the same class of models is making technically difficult exploit development faster and less expensive.

Related guides & Quizzes

AI AgentsKuchengetedzwa kweAIEdza zvaunoziva - edza yemahara AI quizTarisa kumusoro izwi reAI mune yedu glossaryTevedza iyo AI regulation tracker
Wakawana izvi zvinobatsira?