Idanwo ti o sopọ mọ itọsọna · Lile Ipele
AI Ethics adanwo
Tests affected people, actionable principles, accountability, meaningful human authority, alternatives, ongoing review, and residual risk.
Ibeere 1 ti 8
Kini idi ti igbelewọn iwa ko le dinku si Dimegilio awoṣe kan?
Awotẹlẹ gbogbo ibeere8 ibeere
Awọn idahun ati awọn alaye han bi o ṣe n mu ibeere naa.
- Kini idi ti igbelewọn iwa ko le dinku si Dimegilio awoṣe kan?
- Awọn ikun ko wulo rara
- O da lori idi, awọn eniyan ti o kan, awọn iṣowo, ati pinpin awọn ipalara
- Ethics awọn ifiyesi nikan ni ibamu ofin
- Dimegilio giga jẹri ododo
- Iṣẹ kan rọrun fun oniṣẹ ẹrọ ṣugbọn o n di ẹru eniyan ti ko le jade. Kini o yẹ ki atunyẹwo ihuwasi beere?
- Who benefits, bears extra work, and has influence over the design
- Only whether the interface is fast
- Whether the model is open-weight
- How many features can be automated
- Ẹgbẹ kan sọ pe akoyawo jẹ pataki. Kí ló máa mú kí ìlànà náà ṣeé ṣe?
- Add “transparent” to the product description
- Publish the model’s parameter count
- Ask the model to explain itself
- Specify what information users need and when they receive it
- Kini idi ti ilowosi eniyan kii ṣe aabo adaṣe ni adaṣe?
- Humans cannot find model errors
- Human review always makes systems slower
- Reviewers need relevant authority and resources to affect outcomes
- Automation is always more ethical
- Kini o yẹ ki ilana iṣiro ṣe idanimọ?
- Who can investigate, correct, or stop an inappropriate outcome
- Only the vendor’s contact form
- A model’s confidence score
- The number of review meetings
- When should an ethical review be revisited?
- Only before procurement
- After deployment as uses, data, or feedback change
- Only when the model architecture changes
- Never after approval
- A simpler non-AI process can meet the same need with fewer burdens. What should the team do?
- Choose AI because it is innovative
- Ignore staffing and procedure options
- Compare the alternative instead of assuming more automation is better
- Keep the model but remove user feedback
- How should a review report handle disagreement and remaining risk?
- Remove disagreement from the record
- Describe the review as a safety guarantee
- Record only risks the model can measure
- Document both rather than claiming review proves no harm can occur