引导式测验 · 硬 等级
人工智能与版权测验
在跨环境评估人工智能辅助工作时,区分人类作者、服务条款、输入权和可能的侵权行为。
问题 1 的 8
美国版权局对完全由人工智能生成、不受人类创意控制的作品有何规定?
预览每个问题8 问题
当您参加测验时,就会出现答案和解释。
- 美国版权局对完全由人工智能生成、不受人类创意控制的作品有何规定?
- They belong to whichever user paid the most for access
- They can't be copyrighted because human authorship is required
- They are owned automatically by the AI system that generated them
- They receive copyright protection for twice the normal term
- 在 Thaler v. Perlmutter 案中,法院对一张将人工智能系统列为唯一作者的图像做出了什么决定?
- The image entered the public domain after just one year
- The AI was granted copyright protection as a legal person
- Registration was denied because copyright needs a human author
- Copyright went to the company that manufactured the GPU
- 在美国法律中,哪个合理使用因素会考虑使用是否具有“变革性”?
- The purpose and character of the use
- The nature of the copyrighted work
- The effect on the potential market
- The amount of the work used
- 为什么 Authors Guild v. Google 经常在有关版权书籍人工智能训练的争论中被引用?
- It banned all use of copyrighted books in software
- Google was ordered to destroy every single book it had ever scanned
- It gave authors ownership of all search engine results
- Google’s book scanning and limited snippet display for search were fair use on that record
- 根据欧盟 2019 年版权指令中的文本和数据挖掘 (TDM) 例外规定,权利人可以做什么?
- Demand deletion of any trained model anywhere in the world
- Expressly reserve their rights to exclude uses from Article 4’s text and data mining exception
- Block all academic research that uses their works
- Nothing, since all text and data mining is forbidden
- In a copyright dispute about generated text, why can near-verbatim output examples matter?
- The number of users who subscribe to the paid service
- The color scheme and fonts of the chatbot interface
- Outputs reproducing near-verbatim passages from training works
- The model's total electricity consumption during training
- A tool permits commercial use of its outputs. What does that permission establish about third-party rights?
- It does not necessarily resolve rights held by other people
- It proves every training work was licensed
- It guarantees copyright registration
- It overrides local copyright law
- Why should a publisher assess copyrightability and infringement as separate questions?
- The questions always have the same answer
- Infringement only concerns software licenses
- A service contract determines both questions everywhere
- Human authorship may affect protection, while use may still implicate someone else’s rights