引导式测验 · 中等 等级
人工智能在法律发现测验中的应用
了解预测编码、持续主动学习、概念搜索、特权审查和联邦发现规则如何融入电子发现。
问题 1 的 8
“预测编码”在电子发现中有何作用?
预览每个问题8 问题
当您参加测验时,就会出现答案和解释。
- “预测编码”在电子发现中有何作用?
- 从律师编码的样本中学习,根据可能的相关性对数百万份文档进行排名
- 为律师事务所编写软件代码
- 预测审判结果
- 自动加密法庭文件
- 2012 年 Da Silva Moore 命令在技术辅助审查方面做了什么?
- It created a binding national rule requiring predictive coding
- It approved the parties’ proposed predictive-coding protocol in that case
- It held that attorneys no longer need to review discovery
- It approved the use of AI to decide the merits of the lawsuit
- 概念搜索与普通关键字搜索有何不同?
- 它仅适用于以大写字母书写的文档
- 它永久删除不相关的文件
- 即使没有确切的单词,它也能找到语义相关的文档
- 一次只能搜索一个文档
- “持续主动学习”(TAR 2.0)有什么作用?
- 第一批文档后停止学习
- 永久更换所有律师
- 仅按字母顺序对文档进行排序
- 不断重新排名并提供信息最丰富的文档以供审核
- 为什么在法律工作中使用生成人工智能时,幻觉是一个严重的问题?
- 律师因引用人工智能生成的虚假案件而受到制裁
- 它使文档加载缓慢
- 它改变了法律摘要的字体
- 它删除了法庭记录
- How should an AI privilege-detection flag be used in discovery?
- As an automatic final privilege determination in every case
- As a signal for legal review of potentially privileged material under applicable rules and orders
- As proof that all flagged documents must be withheld
- As a replacement for privilege logs and court orders
- What does proportionality in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(1) consider?
- Whether every document must be reviewed manually
- Whether a software vendor promises perfect recall
- Whether discovery is reasonable in light of the needs and circumstances of the case
- Whether the requesting party prefers a particular search tool
- What does Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) allow a federal court to do?
- Declare every document in a data room privileged
- Require parties to produce all attorney-client communications
- Automatically resolve privilege disputes without review
- Order that disclosure in a proceeding does not waive privilege or work-product protection in other proceedings, subject to the order