引导式测验 · 硬 等级

人工智能神话测验

测试流畅答案、数据和模型大小假设、演示、基准、自动化责任和范围背后的证据。

相关引导路径人工智能神话
问题 1 的 8

A model answers fluently and names a source. What should a reader still check?

预览每个问题8 问题

当您参加测验时,就会出现答案和解释。

  1. A model answers fluently and names a source. What should a reader still check?
    • Only whether the answer is polite
    • Whether the response is long enough
    • Whether the model used a large context window
    • Whether the source exists and supports the claim
  2. Does more training data guarantee a better system?
    • No; data can be irrelevant or systematically flawed
    • Yes, if it comes from the internet
    • Yes, regardless of the task
    • No model can learn from more data
  3. Why compare a larger model with smaller or simpler alternatives?
    • Larger models always have worse accuracy
    • It may cost more without meeting the task’s needs
    • A benchmark score cannot be measured
    • Model size determines deployment law
  4. A demo solves one impressive case. What conclusion is justified?
    • That the system can handle every difficult case
    • That it will be reliable in production
    • Only that the demonstrated setup handled that case; more tests are needed
    • That no tool or context contributed
  5. Does automation remove human responsibility for the system?
    • Yes, when outputs are generated automatically
    • Yes, if a vendor hosts the model
    • Only if a model has a high score
    • No; people choose goals, data, interfaces, permissions, and deployment conditions
  6. What does one failure tell you about a system?
    • It reveals a failure worth testing, but not that every use is ineffective
    • That the system is useless for all tasks
    • That the model is conscious
    • That all future versions will fail identically
  7. What is a benchmark result distinct from?
    • A measured score
    • A future prediction or a statement about consciousness
    • An evaluation setup
    • A task-specific test
  8. How should a broad capability claim be phrased?
    • As strongly as possible to attract attention
    • As a guarantee based on a single score
    • At the scope the supporting evidence actually covers
    • Without naming the test conditions