引导式测验 · 硬 等级
在线和离线功能服务偏差测验
练习识别历史训练数据与实时请求之间的功能服务偏差、时间点泄漏以及新鲜度不匹配。
问题 1 的 8
什么是训练/服务偏差?
预览每个问题8 问题
当您参加测验时,就会出现答案和解释。
- 什么是训练/服务偏差?
- 当模型在 GPU 上训练但在 CPU 上运行时
- 当模型太大而无法容纳在内存中时
- 当训练期间离线计算的特征与生产中在线提供的特征不同时
- 当训练时间比预期长时
- When building a historical training row, which feature timestamps should a point-in-time join allow?
- Values available at or before that row’s prediction time
- Values recorded only after the outcome
- The latest values regardless of historical time
- Only values from the next calendar month
- 以下哪一项是导致生产中离线精度过高而崩溃的典型原因?
- 使用的训练样本太少
- 在比服务更快的机器上训练
- 将特征存储在数据库中
- 数据泄漏,训练使用预测时不可用的信息
- A logged live feature distribution differs from training. What should the feature-serving team infer first?
- The serving code is certainly defective
- There is a mismatch to investigate; it may be drift or serving skew
- The feature has no predictive value
- The model must be running on different hardware
- 为什么像“过去一小时的订单”这样的缓存在线功能存在偏差风险?
- 缓存的值可能会过时,并且不再与训练中使用的新计算值匹配
- 缓存总是可以提高模型的准确性
- 缓存使得该功能无法离线计算
- 缓存的特征不能是数字
- Why share one feature definition across batch training and online serving?
- To guarantee every cached value is fresh
- To eliminate changes in incoming populations
- To make timestamp checks unnecessary
- To reduce differences caused by separate transformation implementations
- A transaction model uses a chargeback flag recorded days after purchase. Why is its offline feature join invalid?
- The flag is categorical rather than numerical
- The flag was unavailable when the purchase prediction was made
- Chargeback flags cannot be stored historically
- Only GPU models may use transaction features
- Training recomputes a one-hour order count, but serving reads a ten-minute-old cached count. Which check targets this skew?
- Increase the number of model parameters
- Remove all timestamps from the feature store
- Compare counts for matching entities and times while recording cache freshness
- Switch both paths to a different programming language