本頁閱讀時間3分鐘
概述
The required route depends on whether the system falls under Annex III or is safety-related AI in regulated products, and on applicable standards, common specifications and product legislation.
深入探討
Conformity assessment is the process of demonstrating that a high-risk AI system meets the Act’s requirements. The provider is responsible for classifying, documenting and assessing the system before placing it on the market or putting it into service. The AI Act does not require CE marking for all AI tools; the duties discussed here attach to high-risk AI systems, which may also be subject to other EU product rules. For Annex III point 1, Article 43 allows internal control or notified-body assessment when relevant standards or common specifications are applied. Annex VII is required if neither standards exist nor common specifications are available; the standard is not applied or only partly applied; available specifications are not applied; or an applied standard has a restriction, only for that restricted part. Points 2–8 use Annex VI internal control. For Annex I products, Article 43(3) integrates Section 2 and Article 17 quality-management requirements into the sector procedure. A sectoral no-third-party option conditioned on standards covering all sector requirements is allowed only if standards or Article 41 common specifications also cover all Section 2 requirements. After assessment, the provider draws up an EU declaration of conformity, assumes responsibility for conformity, and affixes CE marking visibly and indelibly, or to packaging or documentation if the system’s nature makes that appropriate. Digitally provided systems may use a digital mark if readily accessible. A notified-body identification number accompanies the CE mark when applicable. The CE mark signals conformity with applicable requirements; it is not a quality award or general guarantee. Substantial modifications can trigger a new assessment, while predetermined changes documented in the original assessment are treated differently.
戰略影響
風險與安全
災難性和日常的人工智慧危害都取決於誰了解風險以及誰能夠採取行動。
更明確的決策
民眾和專業素養決定強而有力的安全政策在政治上是否可行。
突破炒作
清晰的解釋可以減少炒作、實驗室公關和模糊道德劇場的影響。
The Future of EU AI Act Conformity Assessment and CE Marking
The legal framework anticipates harmonised standards, common specifications and notified bodies as parts of implementation, and Regulation 2026/1744 extended high-risk application dates. Technical standards and designation details may change, so providers should verify official Commission and EUR-Lex publications when selecting a route. Voluntary standards assist compliance but do not replace the regulation. Providers should monitor Commission publications on standards and conformity procedures before each launch. A change to intended purpose or system design can affect both classification and assessment, so maintain a controlled change log.
現實世界的實施
A provider classifies an Annex III system, completes the applicable conformity route, signs the EU declaration of conformity and affixes CE marking before market placement.
An Annex III point 1 system uses harmonised standards and chooses internal control or the specified notified-body route as the Act permits.
A high-risk system in an Annex I regulated product follows that sector’s conformity procedure with AI Act requirements integrated.
A software provider checks whether a digital CE mark is easily accessible from the system interface or through a machine-readable means.
風險與防護欄
將存在風險視為科幻小說,同時能力複合。
混淆了表面產品安全與高度自治下的對準。
只給非英語和非專業觀眾留下低品質的資源。
實施路線圖
單獨的產品危害、誤用和失控/失調風險。
詢問哪些證據會改變您對時間表和嚴重性的看法。
比起行銷主張,更喜歡主要來源和具體評估。
確定一條行動路徑:職業、政策、資金或技能——而不僅僅是意識。
不斷探索
Free newsletter
Get the daily AI briefing
Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.
One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.
Test yourself
Take the EU AI Act Conformity Assessment and CE Marking quiz
Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.
Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation
常見問題
What is EU AI Act Conformity Assessment and CE Marking?
The AI Act’s conformity-assessment and CE-marking duties concern high-risk AI systems, not every AI product. The required route depends on whether the system falls under Annex III or is safety-related AI in regulated products, and on applicable standards, common specifications and product legislation.
Which AI systems are the subject of the Act’s high-risk CE-marking obligations?
The conformity and CE provisions apply to high-risk AI systems, not every AI tool.
For Annex III points 2–8, which conformity route does Article 43 specify?
Article 43(2) specifies internal control for these categories.
When can Annex III point 1 providers choose between internal control and notified-body assessment?
Article 43(1) permits the choice where standards or common specifications have been applied.
When neither relevant harmonised standards nor common specifications are available, or a provider only partly applies a relevant harmonised standard, what route applies?
Article 43(1)(a) and (b) require Annex VII when both standards and common specifications are unavailable, or when a provider has not applied or has applied only part of a relevant harmonised standard.
How does conformity work for an AI system embedded in an Annex I regulated product?
Article 43(3) applies the sectoral conformity route and integrates the AI Act requirements.
繼續學習
相關指南
為此主題精選的更多指南