社團指南

Utah HB 452 Mental Health Chatbot Law

Utah HB 452, effective May 7, 2025, added specific protections for generative AI chatbots presented as providing mental-health therapy or help managing or treating mental-health conditions.

  • 4 分鐘閱讀
  • 最後更新
本頁4 分鐘閱讀
  1. 概述
  2. 深入探討
  3. 戰略影響
  4. The Future of Utah HB 452 Mental Health Chatbot Law
  5. 現實世界的實施
  6. 風險與防護欄
  7. 實施路線圖
  8. 不斷探索
  9. 常見問題

概述

The law requires AI disclosures, limits conversational advertising and sharing of certain user information, and provides a conditional safe-harbor defense; it does not license a chatbot as a therapist.

深入探討

Utah HB 452, enacted as Chapter 269 in the 2025 General Session, created Utah Code Chapter 13-72a and related professional-licensing provisions. It took effect May 7, 2025. A “mental health chatbot” is generative AI that engages a user in conversations similar to confidential communications with a licensed therapist, where the supplier represents—or a reasonable person would believe—the tool can provide therapy or help manage or treat mental-health conditions. Scripted content such as guided mindfulness and tools that only connect a user to a human therapist are excluded by the statutory definition. The law’s first pillar is disclosure: suppliers must clearly and conspicuously disclose that the user is interacting with AI, including before access, at the beginning of an interaction after the user has not used it for more than seven days, and when asked. Second, conversational ads for a specific product or service must be clearly identified and disclose sponsorship, affiliation or promotional agreements. A supplier may not use the user’s input to choose or personalize such ads, subject to a narrow allowance for advertising the chatbot itself. Third, suppliers may not sell or share Utah users’ individually identifiable health information or user input with third parties, with listed exceptions including qualifying research and user-requested sharing with a provider or health plan. The law authorizes Utah’s Division of Consumer Protection to enforce its provisions. A supplier may file a written policy with that Division describing the chatbot’s purpose and limitations, therapist involvement, testing, monitoring, crisis procedures, referrals and security/privacy practices to support an affirmative defense in specified actions. The supplier must comply with the filed policy and maintain required documentation; this is not automatic immunity. SB 38’s enrolled text schedules an amendment to the enforcement section effective May 6, 2026; the HB 452 code states that the Division director may impose an administrative fine up to $2,500 per violation. The statute preserves Division enforcement and does not license the chatbot.

戰略影響

風險與安全

災難性和日常的人工智慧危害都取決於誰了解風險以及誰能夠採取行動。

更明確的決策

民眾和專業素養決定強而有力的安全政策在政治上是否可行。

突破炒作

清晰的解釋可以減少炒作、實驗室公關和模糊道德劇場的影響。

The Future of Utah HB 452 Mental Health Chatbot Law

Chapter 13-72a has been effective since May 7, 2025. SB 38’s enrolled text schedules an amendment to its enforcement section effective May 6, 2026. Utah’s Division of Consumer Protection and Department of Commerce provide law and filing information for suppliers. Teams should monitor official code changes and agency guidance, especially for what qualifies as meaningful disclosure and a sufficiently documented filed policy. Keep dated copies of the official code and regulator materials used for decisions. Reassess when a statute changes, a new rule takes effect, a vendor adds a feature, or the system begins influencing a different class of decision.

現實世界的實施

A therapy-like chatbot tells a user it is AI before access, repeats the disclosure at the start of a new conversation after more than seven days away, and answers direct questions about whether it is AI.

A chatbot labels any in-conversation product promotion as an ad and discloses sponsorship or business affiliation.

A vendor contract prohibits selling or sharing individually identifiable health information or user input except within the statutory exceptions.

A supplier files a written policy describing qualified therapist involvement, safety testing, crisis protocols and referrals to support a possible affirmative defense.

風險與防護欄

  • 將存在風險視為科幻小說,同時能力複合。

  • 混淆了表面產品安全與高度自治下的對準。

  • 只給非英語和非專業觀眾留下低品質的資源。

實施路線圖

  1. 單獨的產品危害、誤用和失控/失調風險。

  2. 詢問哪些證據會改變您對時間表和嚴重性的看法。

  3. 比起行銷主張,更喜歡主要來源和具體評估。

  4. 確定一條行動路徑:職業、政策、資金或技能——而不僅僅是意識。

不斷探索

Free newsletter

Get the daily AI briefing

Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.

One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.

Test yourself

Take the Utah HB 452 Mental Health Chatbot Law quiz

Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.

開始測驗

Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation

常見問題

What is Utah HB 452 Mental Health Chatbot Law?

Utah HB 452, effective May 7, 2025, added specific protections for generative AI chatbots presented as providing mental-health therapy or help managing or treating mental-health conditions. The law requires AI disclosures, limits conversational advertising and sharing of certain user information, and provides a conditional safe-harbor defense; it does not license a chatbot as a therapist.

Which system most clearly fits Utah’s mental-health-chatbot definition?

The definition covers generative conversational AI represented or reasonably understood to provide mental-health therapy or help.

When must the chatbot disclose that it is AI?

Section 203 requires clear disclosure before access, at the start after the specified inactivity period, and on request.

How may an in-conversation product advertisement be presented?

The statute requires clear identification of the ad and clear disclosure of sponsorship, affiliation or promotion agreement.

What may a supplier generally not do with a Utah user’s chat input?

The law bars using input to determine whether to show an ad, which product category to advertise, or how to customize it, with a narrow self-ad exception.

Which data does the Utah law restrict suppliers from selling or sharing with third parties?

Section 201 prohibits sale or sharing of the listed user health information and user input, subject to stated exceptions.