返回新聞
創新AI Understanding 簡報

NVIDIA Vera Rubin NVL72 發布領先的 MLPerf Inference v6.1 結果

NVIDIA 發布的預覽結果顯示,在 MLPerf Inference v6.1 套件中,Vera Rubin NVL72 在 Qwen3-VL 上的吞吐量比 GB300 NVL72 高出 3.7 倍,在 DeepSeek-R1 上的吞吐量高出 2.5 倍。

4 min readRead the primary source
Source-provided image accompanying NVIDIA Vera Rubin NVL72 posts leading MLPerf Inference v6.1 results
主要來源文件來源記錄
出版商
blogs.nvidia.com
來源連結
blogs.nvidia.comhttps://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/vera-rubin-nvl72-mlperf-inference/
來源類型
主要文件-我們直接閱讀的官方公告、文件、文件或第一方頁面。
背景60 秒內了解這一點

從這裡開始

關鍵術語

推理
經過訓練的模型產生預測或輸出的運行時階段。
大語言模型(LLM)
在海量文本語料庫上訓練來產生和分析文本的語言模型。
記憶體(代理記憶體)
AI 代理程式跨步驟或會話使用儲存的上下文來提高連續性。
測試一下自己AI 模型解釋測驗

發生了什麼事

NVIDIA submitted preview performance data for its Vera Rubin NVL72 platform to the MLPerf v6.1 benchmark suite, demonstrating significant throughput improvements over the previous generation GB300 NVL72. The results indicate up to 3.7x higher throughput on the Qwen3-VL benchmark and 2.5x higher throughput on DeepSeek-R1, driven by hardware-software co-design, NVFP4 precision, and disaggregated serving techniques.

NVIDIA released preview results for the Vera Rubin NVL72 platform in the MLPerf v6.1 suite, focusing on the DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen3-VL benchmarks. The company reported that Vera Rubin NVL72 delivers up to 3.7x higher throughput than the GB300 NVL72 on Qwen3-VL across offline, server, and interactive scenarios when using vLLM with the NVIDIA Dynamo open-source inference framework. For the DeepSeek-R1 benchmark, using the NVIDIA TensorRT-LLM library, throughput was up to 2.5x higher than the GB300 NVL72.

The performance gains are attributed to full-stack co-design, including enhanced Tensor Cores, the Transformer Engine, and NVFP4 precision, which reduces memory footprint for model weights, attention, and KV cache. The submissions heavily utilized disaggregated serving, separating prefill and decode stages, along with large-scale expert parallelism for mixture-of-experts layers. The NVL72 scale-up domain, powered by sixth-generation NVLink and NVLink Switch, provided the interconnect foundation necessary for these techniques at rack scale.

NVIDIA also highlighted scaling efficiency, noting that the DeepSeek-R1 submission scaled from a single GB300 NVL72 rack to four racks (288 GPUs) with 99% scaling efficiency in the offline scenario. In agentic workloads, specifically the SemiAnalysis AgentX benchmark, Vera Rubin NVL72 delivered 30x better performance than GB300 NVL72 in preview testing. Partner Nebius also submitted Vera Rubin NVL72 preview results, demonstrating similar performance characteristics.

The release includes results from the broader NVIDIA ecosystem, with 19 partners submitting data, including ASUS, Azure, Cisco, CoreWeave, and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. NVIDIA also submitted Jetson AGX Thor results using TensorRT Edge-LLM on the new Edge-Agentic benchmark with Qwen3.6-27B. Post-submission results for GPT-OSS-120B and DLRMv3 showed further gains but are not yet verified by MLCommons.

來源詳情: blogs.nvidia.com ↗

為什麼這很重要

These results provide concrete evidence of the performance trajectory for next-generation AI infrastructure, directly impacting the cost-per-token economics for organizations deploying large language models. By demonstrating near-linear scaling efficiency across multiple racks and substantial gains in agentic workloads, the data helps enterprises forecast infrastructure requirements and validate the economic viability of scaling AI deployments. This matters because inference costs are a primary driver of AI product profitability and accessibility.

The primary significance of these results lies in the quantification of economics. By demonstrating that each Vera Rubin NVL72 rack can generate significantly more tokens and serve more users than a GB300 NVL72 rack, NVIDIA provides a clear metric for cost-per-token reduction. This is critical for organizations where inference costs constitute a major portion of operational expenses, as it directly translates to higher revenue potential or lower service costs for the same workload.

The emphasis on scaling efficiency addresses a common pain point in AI infrastructure: the non-linear relationship between hardware addition and throughput gains. Achieving 99% scaling efficiency across 288 GPUs suggests that the architecture and interconnects are effectively mitigating communication bottlenecks, allowing organizations to predict performance gains more accurately when expanding their AI factories.

The inclusion of agentic workload benchmarks, such as SemiAnalysis AgentX, signals a shift in how AI performance is measured. As AI systems move from single-turn responses to multi-step reasoning and action, traditional throughput metrics may not fully capture utility. The 30x performance improvement in this specific domain indicates that next-generation hardware is specifically optimized for the latency and compute demands of agentic AI, which is a growing sector in enterprise applications.

Interactive Mechanism

互動機制:它實際上是如何運作的

以互動方式探索這項發展背後的基礎技術。

Thinking Budget (Test-Time Tokens):1,024 tokens
Complex Accuracy79%Math & Code Logic
Latency3.2sTime to first full output
Inference Cost$0.0092Per query estimated
Reasoning StyleStep VerificationInternal chain depth
Active Thinking Trace:
1Deconstruct user problem into formal constraints
2Propose candidate hypotheses & step-by-step calculation
3Self-correction: Backtrack and refute subtle edge cases
4Exhaustive consistency check & final output synthesis
Core takeaway: Test-time compute fundamentally changes AI economics. Instead of only scaling during pre-training, giving reasoning models more tokens at inference time allows them to systematically solve PhD-level STEM problems.
互動式概念檢查+10 Points
AI Models Explained Quiz

Which component of an AI application is the machine-learning model itself?

接下來看什麼

Monitor the final verification of these results by MLCommons and the subsequent release of the Vera Rubin platform to the market. Additionally, track the adoption of the new MLPerf Endpoints benchmark for agentic , which will standardize performance metrics for multi-step AI agents, and observe how competitors respond to these specific throughput and scaling efficiency benchmarks.

The final verification of these preview results by MLCommons is the immediate next step. Until verified, these numbers are preliminary and subject to change. The official release will provide the definitive performance baseline for the Vera Rubin platform.

The market availability and pricing of the Vera Rubin NVL72 platform will determine its practical impact. While the performance gains are documented, the cost of the hardware and the transition period from GB300 will influence adoption rates. Organizations will need to weigh the performance benefits against the capital expenditure required for the upgrade.

The development and adoption of the MLPerf Endpoints benchmark for agentic will be crucial. As this benchmark becomes standardized, it will provide a more comprehensive view of AI system capabilities beyond raw token throughput, potentially reshaping how vendors market and compare their platforms.

相關指引和測驗

人工智慧模型解釋人工智慧培訓AI 的未來測試你所知道的—嘗試免費的人工智慧測驗在我們的詞彙表中尋找人工智慧術語關注 AI 模型發布追蹤器
覺得有用嗎?