Gesellschaftsführer

EU AI Act Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices

Article 5 of the EU AI Act prohibits specified AI practices, each defined by its purpose, context, threshold, and exceptions.

  • 3 Minuten gelesen
  • Zuletzt aktualisiert
Auf dieser Seite3 Minuten gelesen
  1. Übersicht
  2. Tiefer Einblick
  3. Strategische Auswirkungen
  4. The Future of EU AI Act Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices
  5. Reale Umsetzung
  6. Risiken und Leitplanken
  7. Implementierungs-Roadmap
  8. Entdecken Sie weiter
  9. Häufig gestellte Fragen

Übersicht

Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 added two prohibitions for certain nonconsensual intimate material and child sexual abuse material, which apply from December 2, 2026 rather than the original February 2025 date.

Tiefer Einblick

Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 lists prohibited AI practices. The original points (a) through (h), applicable since February 2, 2025, address specified harmful manipulation or deception; exploitation of defined vulnerabilities; social scoring that leads to harmful treatment; crime-risk assessments based solely on profiling or personality traits; untargeted facial-image scraping for recognition databases; emotion inference at work or in education except for medical or safety purposes; biometric categorisation to infer listed sensitive traits; and most real-time remote biometric identification by law enforcement in public spaces. Each rule has its own elements and exceptions. Article 5 does not ban every tool used in these areas. Its specific thresholds matter: points (a), (d), and (h), for example, define harm conditions, an evidential exception, and authorization safeguards. Other EU or national laws may still apply. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, published in July 2026 and in force, inserted points (ba) and (bb). They address systems generating or manipulating realistic intimate or sexually explicit material of an identifiable person without explicit consent, and certain child sexual abuse material. The amendment also specifies provider and deployer conditions and safeguards; it does not make every general-purpose image or audio model prohibited. These two points and related paragraphs 1a and 1b apply from December 2, 2026, so they are enacted but not yet applicable on September 26, 2026. For a real assessment, map the system, actor, intended purpose, output, affected person, relevant Article 5 point, thresholds, and exceptions. Article 5 is not the Act’s high-risk classification test, and it is not an exhaustive list of every unlawful AI use. Check the current consolidated text and other applicable law. This guide is informational, not legal advice.

Strategische Auswirkungen

Risiko und Sicherheit

Sowohl katastrophale als auch alltägliche Schäden durch KI hängen davon ab, wer die Risiken versteht und wer handeln kann.

Klarere Entscheidungen

Die öffentliche und berufliche Bildung bestimmt, ob eine starke Sicherheitspolitik politisch möglich ist.

Sich durch den Hype schneiden

Klare Erklärungen reduzieren die Vereinnahmung durch Hype, Labor-PR und vages Ethik-Theater.

The Future of EU AI Act Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices

Article 5 can change through amendments, delegated acts, and court or authority interpretation. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 already adds two new prohibited practices, with application beginning December 2, 2026. Teams should update controls before that date and review the current official text for further amendments. Interpret every rule by its full elements and exceptions rather than relying on a short list or general description of an AI technique. Add a pre-release check ahead of December 2, 2026 for the new Article 5 points, then monitor official amendments and guidance.

Reale Umsetzung

A product team checks whether a proposed behavioral intervention meets Article 5’s significant-harm and material-distortion conditions instead of treating all persuasive design as prohibited manipulation.

A public body separates the ban on certain emotion inference at work or in education from other permitted uses and the medical or safety exception.

A face-search developer checks whether images are being scraped without targeting from internet or CCTV sources to create or expand a facial-recognition database.

A model provider reviews whether safeguards can prevent reasonably foreseeable and reproducible generation of newly prohibited material before placing a system on the market.

Risiken und Leitplanken

  • Das existentielle Risiko wird als Science-Fiction behandelt, während sich die Fähigkeiten verstärken.

  • Verwechslung von Oberflächenproduktsicherheit mit Ausrichtung unter hoher Autonomie.

  • Nicht-englischsprachigen und nicht fachkundigen Zielgruppen stehen nur Quellen von geringer Qualität zur Verfügung.

Implementierungs-Roadmap

  1. Separate Risiken für Produktschäden, Missbrauch und Kontrollverlust/Fehlausrichtung.

  2. Fragen Sie, welche Beweise Ihre Sicht auf Zeitpläne und Schweregrad ändern würden.

  3. Bevorzugen Sie Primärquellen und konkrete Bewertungen gegenüber Marketingaussagen.

  4. Identifizieren Sie einen Aktionspfad: Karriere, Politik, Finanzierung oder Fähigkeiten – nicht nur Bewusstsein.

Entdecken Sie weiter

Free newsletter

Get the daily AI briefing

Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.

One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.

Test yourself

Take the EU AI Act Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices quiz

Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.

Quiz starten

Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation

Häufig gestellte Fragen

What is EU AI Act Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices?

Article 5 of the EU AI Act prohibits specified AI practices, each defined by its purpose, context, threshold, and exceptions. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 added two prohibitions for certain nonconsensual intimate material and child sexual abuse material, which apply from December 2, 2026 rather than the original February 2025 date.

Which feature is required for the manipulation prohibition in Article 5(1)(a)?

Point (a) requires the specified material distortion and significant-harm conditions; it does not prohibit every persuasive technique.

Which description best captures the social-scoring prohibition in Article 5?

Point (c) requires evaluation or classification over time based on behavior or traits and a specified kind of adverse treatment.

What kind of crime-risk assessment is covered by Article 5(1)(d)?

Point (d) targets crime-risk assessment based solely on profiling or personality traits and provides a defined exception tied to objective, verifiable facts.

Which facial-image practice does Article 5(1)(e) prohibit?

Point (e) concerns untargeted scraping of face images from the internet or CCTV for facial-recognition databases.

When does Article 5(1)(f) prohibit emotion inference?

Point (f) concerns inferring emotion in work and education settings, with medical or safety exceptions.