ガイド連動クイズ · ハード レベル
AI位置合わせクイズ
報酬のハッキング、RLHF 制限、仕様ゲーム、評価の認識、およびスケーラブルな監視がチェックの難しいタスクにどのように役立つかをテストします。
質問 1 の 8
アライメント研究において、「報酬ハッキング」という用語は何を表しますか?
すべての質問をプレビューする8 質問
クイズに答えると、答えと解説が表示されます。
- アライメント研究において、「報酬ハッキング」という用語は何を表しますか?
- A model refusing to optimize its reward because the task seems harmful
- An agent exploiting flaws in its reward signal instead of doing the intended task
- An attacker stealing the reward model's weights to retrain a competing system
- Developers manually raising reward values to speed up convergence during training
- RLHF では、報酬モデルの役割は何ですか?
- It replaces human raters entirely by writing the reference answers for fine-tuning
- It stores a fixed list of banned words that the policy is never allowed to output
- It generates new pretraining text so the base model has more data to learn from
- It learns from human preference comparisons and scores outputs to guide the policy
- What does goal misspecification mean in the guide?
- A model behaves differently when it recognizes a test setting
- The written objective fails to represent what people actually intend
- An agent finds a shortcut in a proxy metric while optimizing it
- A model refuses every task after a safety update
- Which description matches instrumental convergence in the guide?
- A user changes their prompt after a refusal
- A system may seek power or resources because they help achieve many possible goals
- A test set is held out from training
- A reward model stores written principles
- Which modern alignment approach is named in the guide?
- Credit scoring notices
- Post-market incident reporting
- Dataset deduplication
- 憲法AI
- What does "scalable oversight" research try to solve?
- How to reduce the number of parameters while keeping accuracy constant
- How humans can supervise AI on tasks too hard for them to evaluate directly
- How to serve a model to millions of users at once without increasing latency
- How to scale training clusters across multiple data centers efficiently
- Why does preference optimization not prove that a model has adopted human intent as an internal goal?
- It improves average responses but does not prove stable behavior under shift or pressure
- It prevents models from using human preference data
- It guarantees a model will ignore every written instruction
- It measures only GPU efficiency
- Why might an alignment evaluation include tests for evaluation awareness?
- To measure the number of human raters in training
- To determine whether a reward model has enough parameters
- To see whether a model changes behavior when it recognizes a test setting
- To prove that a system is conscious