Societate GHID

EU AI Act Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices

Article 5 of the EU AI Act prohibits specified AI practices, each defined by its purpose, context, threshold, and exceptions.

  • 3 minute de citit
  • Ultima actualizare
Pe această pagină3 minute de citit
  1. Prezentare generală
  2. Scufundare în profunzime
  3. Impact strategic
  4. The Future of EU AI Act Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices
  5. Implementare în lumea reală
  6. Riscuri și balustrade
  7. Foaia de parcurs de implementare
  8. Continuați să explorați
  9. Întrebări frecvente

Prezentare generală

Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 added two prohibitions for certain nonconsensual intimate material and child sexual abuse material, which apply from December 2, 2026 rather than the original February 2025 date.

Scufundare în profunzime

Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 lists prohibited AI practices. The original points (a) through (h), applicable since February 2, 2025, address specified harmful manipulation or deception; exploitation of defined vulnerabilities; social scoring that leads to harmful treatment; crime-risk assessments based solely on profiling or personality traits; untargeted facial-image scraping for recognition databases; emotion inference at work or in education except for medical or safety purposes; biometric categorisation to infer listed sensitive traits; and most real-time remote biometric identification by law enforcement in public spaces. Each rule has its own elements and exceptions. Article 5 does not ban every tool used in these areas. Its specific thresholds matter: points (a), (d), and (h), for example, define harm conditions, an evidential exception, and authorization safeguards. Other EU or national laws may still apply. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, published in July 2026 and in force, inserted points (ba) and (bb). They address systems generating or manipulating realistic intimate or sexually explicit material of an identifiable person without explicit consent, and certain child sexual abuse material. The amendment also specifies provider and deployer conditions and safeguards; it does not make every general-purpose image or audio model prohibited. These two points and related paragraphs 1a and 1b apply from December 2, 2026, so they are enacted but not yet applicable on September 26, 2026. For a real assessment, map the system, actor, intended purpose, output, affected person, relevant Article 5 point, thresholds, and exceptions. Article 5 is not the Act’s high-risk classification test, and it is not an exhaustive list of every unlawful AI use. Check the current consolidated text and other applicable law. This guide is informational, not legal advice.

Impact strategic

Risc și siguranță

Daunele catastrofale și cotidiene ale IA depind de cine înțelege riscurile și cine poate acționa.

Decizii mai clare

Educația publică și profesională influențează dacă o politică puternică de siguranță este posibilă din punct de vedere politic.

Tăierea hype-ului

Explicațiile clare reduc captarea de hype, PR de laborator și teatrul vag de etică.

The Future of EU AI Act Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices

Article 5 can change through amendments, delegated acts, and court or authority interpretation. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 already adds two new prohibited practices, with application beginning December 2, 2026. Teams should update controls before that date and review the current official text for further amendments. Interpret every rule by its full elements and exceptions rather than relying on a short list or general description of an AI technique. Add a pre-release check ahead of December 2, 2026 for the new Article 5 points, then monitor official amendments and guidance.

Implementare în lumea reală

A product team checks whether a proposed behavioral intervention meets Article 5’s significant-harm and material-distortion conditions instead of treating all persuasive design as prohibited manipulation.

A public body separates the ban on certain emotion inference at work or in education from other permitted uses and the medical or safety exception.

A face-search developer checks whether images are being scraped without targeting from internet or CCTV sources to create or expand a facial-recognition database.

A model provider reviews whether safeguards can prevent reasonably foreseeable and reproducible generation of newly prohibited material before placing a system on the market.

Riscuri și balustrade

  • Tratarea riscului existențial ca SF în timp ce capacitatea se agravează.

  • Confuză siguranța produsului de suprafață cu alinierea sub autonomie ridicată.

  • Lăsând audiențe non-engleze și neexperte doar surse de calitate scăzută.

Foaia de parcurs de implementare

  1. Separați riscurile de deteriorare a produsului, utilizare greșită și pierderea controlului / dezaliniere.

  2. Întrebați ce dovezi v-ar schimba punctul de vedere cu privire la termene și severitate.

  3. Preferați sursele primare și evaluările concrete față de afirmațiile de marketing.

  4. Identificați o singură cale de acțiune: carieră, politică, finanțare sau abilități - nu numai conștientizare.

Continuați să explorați

Free newsletter

Get the daily AI briefing

Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.

One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.

Test yourself

Take the EU AI Act Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices quiz

Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.

Quiz Start

Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation

Întrebări frecvente

What is EU AI Act Article 5: Prohibited AI Practices?

Article 5 of the EU AI Act prohibits specified AI practices, each defined by its purpose, context, threshold, and exceptions. Regulation (EU) 2026/1744 added two prohibitions for certain nonconsensual intimate material and child sexual abuse material, which apply from December 2, 2026 rather than the original February 2025 date.

Which feature is required for the manipulation prohibition in Article 5(1)(a)?

Point (a) requires the specified material distortion and significant-harm conditions; it does not prohibit every persuasive technique.

Which description best captures the social-scoring prohibition in Article 5?

Point (c) requires evaluation or classification over time based on behavior or traits and a specified kind of adverse treatment.

What kind of crime-risk assessment is covered by Article 5(1)(d)?

Point (d) targets crime-risk assessment based solely on profiling or personality traits and provides a defined exception tied to objective, verifiable facts.

Which facial-image practice does Article 5(1)(e) prohibit?

Point (e) concerns untargeted scraping of face images from the internet or CCTV for facial-recognition databases.

When does Article 5(1)(f) prohibit emotion inference?

Point (f) concerns inferring emotion in work and education settings, with medical or safety exceptions.