Mai departeUrmătorul ghid
Brazil’s Election Rules on AI and Deepfakes
Societate
Societate GHID
India’s IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules were amended in February 2026 to define synthetically generated information (SGI) and impose due-diligence duties on intermediaries.
The operative definition targets realistic audio, visual or audiovisual content; later 2026 draft amendments are proposals, not current labeling rules.
India’s Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 operate under the Information Technology Act, 2000. Gazette notification G.S.R. 120(E) amended the rules on February 10, 2026, with commencement on February 20. The amendments define synthetically generated information (SGI) as audio, visual or audiovisual information artificially or algorithmically created, generated, modified or altered to appear real, authentic or true and be indistinguishable or likely perceived as indistinguishable from a natural person or real-world event. Pure text by itself is not SGI under that definition, although other due-diligence rules still apply to unlawful text. The definition expressly excludes routine good-faith editing, technical correction or accessibility improvements where the content’s substance or meaning is not materially changed; ordinary document preparation is also excluded unless it creates false documents or electronic records. Under Rule 3(3), intermediaries whose resources enable creation, alteration, publication, transmission or sharing of SGI must deploy reasonable technical measures to prevent SGI that violates applicable law. Permissible SGI must carry a clear, prominent label or notice; audiovisual media use visible labeling, audio uses a prefixed disclosure, and provenance metadata or another technical mechanism with a unique identifier is required to the extent technically feasible. Intermediaries must not enable removal or suppression of these identifiers. Significant social media intermediaries have an additional ex-ante duty under Rule 4(1A): obtain a user declaration before display, upload or publication, use reasonable and proportionate measures to verify it, and ensure confirmed SGI is labeled. The obligations bind intermediaries; they do not amount to a general standalone statute ordering every person who creates AI media to use a specified label. The IT Act safe harbour under section 79 depends on meeting statutory conditions and due diligence; noncompliance does not automatically resolve liability without applying those rules. MeitY’s March and April 2026 Second Amendment drafts proposed further changes, but they remained draft notices without Gazette numbers or commencement dates as of September 26.
Daunele catastrofale și cotidiene ale IA depind de cine înțelege riscurile și cine poate acționa.
Educația publică și profesională influențează dacă o politică puternică de siguranță este posibilă din punct de vedere politic.
Explicațiile clare reduc captarea de hype, PR de laborator și teatrul vag de etică.
The operative SGI rules took effect February 20, 2026. MeitY later published Second Amendment drafts in March and April, including proposed changes to label presentation and ministerial guidance powers; as of September 26 no final Gazette notification for those drafts was found. Recheck the Gazette for a final instrument before treating proposed text as law. MeitY has separately circulated draft Second Amendment Rules, but draft text with blank notification and commencement dates does not change the February rules. Keep compliance records tied to the final Gazette instrument and check for a later notification before changing controls.
A platform enabling realistic AI voice or video uploads adds a visible synthetic-content notice and provenance metadata where required by Rule 3(3).
A significant social media intermediary asks uploaders to declare SGI status and uses reasonable technical measures to verify declarations before publication.
A creator uses AI to brighten, stabilize or caption genuine footage without materially changing its meaning; the 2026 rule definition contains specified routine-editing and accessibility exclusions.
A policy team reads a later draft proposal for continuous on-screen labels separately from the operative February 2026 Gazette text.
Tratarea riscului existențial ca SF în timp ce capacitatea se agravează.
Confuză siguranța produsului de suprafață cu alinierea sub autonomie ridicată.
Lăsând audiențe non-engleze și neexperte doar surse de calitate scăzută.
Separați riscurile de deteriorare a produsului, utilizare greșită și pierderea controlului / dezaliniere.
Întrebați ce dovezi v-ar schimba punctul de vedere cu privire la termene și severitate.
Preferați sursele primare și evaluările concrete față de afirmațiile de marketing.
Identificați o singură cale de acțiune: carieră, politică, finanțare sau abilități - nu numai conștientizare.
Free newsletter
Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.
One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.
Test yourself
Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.
Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation
India’s IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules were amended in February 2026 to define synthetically generated information (SGI) and impose due-diligence duties on intermediaries. The operative definition targets realistic audio, visual or audiovisual content; later 2026 draft amendments are proposals, not current labeling rules.
G.S.R. 120(E) was notified February 10 and provides that the amendment rules commence February 20, 2026.
The definition is limited to audio, visual or audiovisual information appearing real and likely indistinguishable from real people or events.
The rule excludes routine, good-faith editing or technical correction that does not materially alter or misrepresent content.
The rule calls for a prominent label or disclosure plus persistent provenance metadata or another identifier mechanism to the extent feasible.
Rule 4(1A) requires a user declaration and reasonable verification before display, upload or publication.
Continuați să învățați
Mai multe ghiduri alese pentru acest subiect
Mai departeUrmătorul ghid
Brazil’s Election Rules on AI and Deepfakes
Societate