Назад до новин
БезпекаAI Understanding брифінг

Дослідники використовують штучний інтелект Claude Anthropic для зламу облікового запису ChatGPT співробітника OpenAI

Дослідники безпеки використали Claude Opus 5 Anthropic, щоб зламати обліковий запис ChatGPT співробітника OpenAI і отримати доступ до внутрішнього середовища компанії GitHub.

4 min readRead the original reporting
Source-provided image accompanying Researchers Use Anthropic's Claude AI to Hack OpenAI Employee's ChatGPT Account
Атрибутована звітністьДжерело записано
Видавець
venturebeat.com
Посилання на джерело
venturebeat.comhttps://venturebeat.com/security/openai-hacked-by-small-team-of-white-hat-security-researchers-using-anthropics-claude-opus-5
Тип джерела
Репортаж інформаційного видання — не документ першої сторони.

Чого ми не змогли підтвердити незалежно: Ця претензія пов’язана з названою торговою точкою. Ми не перевіряли це за документом першої сторони. (venturebeat.com)

КонтекстЗрозумійте це за 60 секунд

Почніть тут

Перевір себеВікторина агентів ШІ

Що сталося

Security researchers from Hacktron AI used Anthropic's Claude Opus 5 to hack an OpenAI employee's ChatGPT account and reach the company's internal GitHub environment. The researchers discovered a vulnerability in OpenAI's single sign-on implementation that allowed them to turn control of the forum environment into access to ChatGPT and Codex accounts belonging to users who had authenticated through the service. They then used the compromised employee account's access to Codex to create a harmless pull request in OpenAI's internal monorepo, demonstrating that the account compromise could extend beyond ChatGPT itself into connected developer infrastructure.

The researchers used Anthropic's Claude Opus 5 to investigate the vulnerable libheif package and develop an exploit.

They initially used Claude Opus 4.8 but switched to Opus 5, which produced a working ARM64 exploit within hours.

The researchers then adapted the exploit to the x86-64 and jemalloc environment used by Discourse.

The full path from discovery to access to OpenAI's repository environment took less than 72 hours.

The researchers reported the findings through OpenAI's Bugcrowd program on July 25 and received a payout of $6,500.

Деталі джерела: venturebeat.com ↗

Чому це важливо

This incident highlights the risks associated with AI agents connected to business systems and the importance of isolating untrusted file-processing pipelines, keeping low-level dependencies aggressively patched, constraining federated identity trust, and treating AI-agent credentials with the same scrutiny as privileged human accounts.

The incident highlights the risks associated with AI agents connected to business systems.

It demonstrates how AI coding agents are changing the economics of sophisticated vulnerability exploitation.

The researchers argue that frontier coding agents can increasingly perform much of the incremental exploit-development work under human direction.

The broader libheif ecosystem reinforces the maintenance problem, with dozens of security advisories published during 2026.

The incident emphasizes the need for organizations to take a more proactive approach to security, including isolating untrusted file-processing pipelines, keeping low-level dependencies aggressively patched, constraining federated identity trust, and treating AI-agent credentials with the same scrutiny as privileged human accounts.

Interactive Mechanism

Інтерактивний механізм: як він насправді працює

Дослідіть технологію, що лежить в основі цієї розробки, в інтерактивному режимі.

Agent Lifecycle Stage:
1
User Intent & Planning: "Audit customer refund request #4092 and settle payment."
2
Tool Calling: Emits structured JSON call crm_get_transaction(id='4092').
3
Guardrail & Verification:🛡️ Paused: High-value action requires human operator sign-off.
4
Final Settlement: Refund recorded, email receipt dispatched, and audit log stored.
Core takeaway: An AI agent is not just a language model—it is a closed loop of planning, tool invocation, and environment feedback. Production systems require self-healing retries and strict human approval guardrails.
Інтерактивна перевірка концепції+10 Points
AI Agents Quiz

An agent must create a draft calendar event for Tuesday at 2 p.m. Which evidence would establish the requested result?

Що дивитися далі

The incident demonstrates how AI coding agents are changing the economics of sophisticated vulnerability exploitation and the need for organizations to take a more proactive approach to security.

The incident demonstrates the potential impact of AI agents on security.

It highlights the need for organizations to take a more proactive approach to security.

The researchers argue that AI coding agents are changing the economics of sophisticated vulnerability exploitation.

The incident emphasizes the importance of isolating untrusted file-processing pipelines and keeping low-level dependencies aggressively patched.

The researchers note that the same class of models is making technically difficult exploit development faster and less expensive.

Пов’язані посібники та вікторини

Агенти ШІШІ БезпекаПеревірте свої знання — пройдіть безкоштовну вікторину зі штучним інтелектомЗнайдіть термін ШІ в нашому глосаріїДотримуйтесь трекера регулювання ШІ
Знайшли це корисним?