Chính quy nhất quán trong bài kiểm tra học tập bán giám sát

Câu trả lời và giải thích xuất hiện khi bạn làm bài kiểm tra.

1. What is the main consistency assumption?
   • Any change to an input must change its class
   • Unlabeled data should be assigned random labels
   • Small label-preserving perturbations should not change the model’s prediction
   • All examples should produce identical outputs
2. How is an unlabeled example used in a basic consistency loss?
   • Assign it a verified ground-truth label
   • Use it only to compute classification accuracy
   • Remove it after augmentation
   • Compare predictions from two perturbed views and penalize their difference
3. Which is an example of a label-preserving image perturbation when appropriate?
   • A modest crop or rotation that leaves the object class unchanged
   • Replacing the object with a different class
   • Removing all pixels containing the target
   • Changing the label at random
4. What does the low-density decision-boundary intuition suggest?
   • Place a boundary through every cluster center
   • Place decision boundaries away from dense groups of similar unlabeled examples
   • Ignore the unlabeled distribution
   • Force every cluster to have one class
5. What is a stop-gradient doing in a teacher-student consistency setup?
   • It removes the unsupervised loss
   • It freezes every model parameter permanently
   • It prevents the target branch from receiving the matching-loss gradient
   • It makes both views identical
6. How does FixMatch use confidence?
   • It uses every weak prediction as a hard label
   • It sets confidence to one for all classes
   • It drops the strongly augmented view
   • It keeps a pseudo-label from a weak view only when confidence passes a threshold
7. Why are unlabeled examples useful in this method?
   • They provide additional input structure without requiring a human label for each example
   • They guarantee the class labels are correct
   • They replace the labeled validation set
   • They eliminate the need for augmentation
8. Which evaluation would best test a consistency method’s intended behavior?
   • Check only training loss
   • Measure prediction stability across label-preserving views and task quality on held-out labeled data
   • Test on a single augmented view
   • Count unlabeled examples without measuring outputs