quiz bu lëkkale ak tegtal · Dëgër Niveau
Quiz ci ethique IA
Test yi dañu laal nit ñi, njàngale yuñ mëna jëfandikoo, lim, kiliftéefu nit bu am solo, yeneen pexe, xoolaat bu wéy, ak risk yu des.
Laaj 1 de 8
Lu tax evaluation ethique mënu ñu ko wàññi ci benn poñ model?
Xoolaatal laaj bu nekk8 laaj
Sooy def quiz bi, tontu yi ak leeral yi dañuy feeñ.
- Lu tax evaluation ethique mënu ñu ko wàññi ci benn poñ model?
- Njortu yi duñu musa am njariñ
- Dafay aju ci mébet bi, nit ñiñ laal, njaay yi, ak séddale loraange yi
- Ethique mingi aju ci topp yoon
- Njortu bu bari dafay firndeel yoon
- A service is convenient for its operator but burdens people who cannot opt out. What should an ethical review ask?
- Who benefits, bears extra work, and has influence over the design
- Only whether the interface is fast
- Whether the model is open-weight
- How many features can be automated
- A team says transparency is important. What would make the principle actionable?
- Add “transparent” to the product description
- Publish the model’s parameter count
- Ask the model to explain itself
- Specify what information users need and when they receive it
- Why is human involvement not automatically an ethical safeguard?
- Humans cannot find model errors
- Human review always makes systems slower
- Reviewers need relevant authority and resources to affect outcomes
- Automation is always more ethical
- What should an accountability process identify?
- Who can investigate, correct, or stop an inappropriate outcome
- Only the vendor’s contact form
- A model’s confidence score
- The number of review meetings
- When should an ethical review be revisited?
- Only before procurement
- After deployment as uses, data, or feedback change
- Only when the model architecture changes
- Never after approval
- A simpler non-AI process can meet the same need with fewer burdens. What should the team do?
- Choose AI because it is innovative
- Ignore staffing and procedure options
- Compare the alternative instead of assuming more automation is better
- Keep the model but remove user feedback
- How should a review report handle disagreement and remaining risk?
- Remove disagreement from the record
- Describe the review as a safety guarantee
- Record only risks the model can measure
- Document both rather than claiming review proves no harm can occur