quiz bu lëkkale ak tegtal · Diggante Niveau

IA ci Quiz buy wax luy waaja am ci gaañ-gaañu atlet

Xoolaat man-mani liggéey bi, njàngum gaañ-gaañu yu lalu ci GPS, desekilibre ci klaas yi, àppu validasioŋ yi, model metrik yi, ak ñàkka wóor ci xayma risku gaañ-gaañu yi.

Yooni njiit yu jëm ciIA ci xayma gaañ-gaañu atlet
Laaj 1 de 8

Lan mooy ratio bi digganté liggey bu metti ak bu amul àpp di tënk?

Xoolaatal laaj bu nekk8 laaj

Sooy def quiz bi, tontu yi ak leeral yi dañuy feeñ.

  1. Lan mooy ratio bi digganté liggey bu metti ak bu amul àpp di tënk?
    • A recent workload relative to a longer-term workload summary
    • A player’s injury severity relative to salary
    • A team’s travel time relative to match time
    • Heart-rate variability relative to sleep duration
  2. Lan moo waral xeetu gaañ-gaañu yi di jafe jàngat sudee limuy jur bariwul?
    • Every athlete has the same outcome
    • A model can appear accurate while missing many rare injury events
    • Rare events eliminate the need for validation
    • A high accuracy score guarantees useful prediction
  3. Ban natt lañu jëfandikoo ci njàngum liggéeyu futbal Australie?
    • Ticket scans and social-media posts
    • Only heart-rate variability
    • GPS, accelerometer, and player-perceived exertion data
    • Only video of match officials
  4. Lan mooy xayma ci xeetu seetlu gaañ-gaañu?
    • A guaranteed date of injury
    • A clinical diagnosis without examination
    • A certain training prescription
    • A probability or risk estimate for a defined outcome and period
  5. Lu Carey ak ñeneen ñi def. rapoor ngir wax luy am ci gaañ-gaañu yu amul laal ci sesoŋ bi ci topp?
    • Performance was only marginally better than chance, with AUC below 0.65
    • Every outcome had perfect accuracy
    • AUC was always 1.0
    • The study did not test a later season
  6. What validation gap did the 2026 systematic review report for all included studies?
    • All used a separate country for testing
    • None used external validation
    • All models were tested prospectively in clinics
    • No study reported any outcome metrics
  7. Which split did the Australian football study use to test its injury forecasts?
    • It mixed all three seasons randomly for every result
    • It trained only on injury labels from the third season
    • It trained using the first two seasons and evaluated predictions on the third
    • It evaluated only on the training rows
  8. What do sensitivity and specificity measure in an injury model?
    • They both measure only training speed
    • Sensitivity is cost and specificity is model size
    • They are alternative names for data leakage
    • Sensitivity concerns detecting injured cases; specificity concerns correctly identifying non-injured cases