quiz bu lëkkale ak tegtal · Diggante Niveau
Quiz jàng ci biir muy tekki
Xoolaat wane yu gaaw yi, poid model yu takku, yamaleg gëstu boppu induction, effet yu misaal-komànd, ak budget contexte ci jàng-shot yu néew.
Laaj 1 de 8
Lan mooy soppeeku ci biir model bi ci diiru jàng ci biir contexte?
Xoolaatal laaj bu nekk8 laaj
Sooy def quiz bi, tontu yi ak leeral yi dañuy feeñ.
- Lan mooy soppeeku ci biir model bi ci diiru jàng ci biir contexte?
- Diisaayu model bi ñu ngi koy yeesal ci yenn jéego yu am degrade
- Dañu tàggat benn couche adaptateur bu ndaw ci misaal yi
- Royuwaay bi dafay fàttaliku liggéey bu bees bi ba fàww
- Amul lenn luy soppiku ci diisaay yi; prompt bi kese mooy doxal génn gi
- Ab laajte bu amaale ay misaal yuñ liggéey balaa ñuy woowe laaj bu dëggu bi:
- Zero-shot
- Few-shot
- Akordement
- Jàng buy dooleel
- What does GPT-3's reported improvement in few-shot performance with scale establish?
- A universal rule that all models below one hundred billion parameters cannot use examples
- A requirement for internet access during every prompt
- An observed trend for the evaluated models and tasks
- A separate emergency training phase
- How should induction-head research be related to broad in-context learning?
- As evidence about a studied mechanism, with limitations on broader conclusions
- As proof that every task uses only one circuit
- As a permanent database of every demonstration
- As a replacement for all task evaluation
- How should an application compare repeated few-shot prompting with fine-tuning?
- Assume fine-tuning is always the least expensive choice
- Measure task quality and the relevant training, request, and maintenance costs
- Assume adding unlimited prompt examples has no cost
- Decide solely by which approach has the longer name
- A few-shot ticket prompt demonstrates only refund and billing labels. What do those examples provide for the next ticket?
- An automatic update to the model's stored weights
- A guarantee that every next ticket fits one of the labels
- A permanent change to all future conversations
- An in-prompt task and label pattern that can guide classification
- Why might the same few-shot classification examples produce different results after reordering?
- The model can be sensitive to the order of examples in its context
- Reordering automatically retrains every parameter
- The label texts must disappear
- The model's vocabulary changes with each permutation
- What resource tradeoff arises when more demonstrations are added to an in-context prompt?
- They use no input tokens because they are examples
- They make the context limit disappear
- They consume more supported context and per-request processing
- They permanently reduce the model's parameter count