quiz bu lëkkale ak tegtal · Dëgër Niveau
Fonction yu am njeexital ci quiz biy joxe done ci tàggat yaram
Dafay saytu li ñuy woowe influens-fonction kontrefaktuel, xayma Hessian, lu màndarga influens yi di tekki ak joxe done ci misaali làkk yi.
Laaj 1 de 8
Ban laaj kontrefaktuel mooy fonction yi am ci njeexte?
Xoolaatal laaj bu nekk8 laaj
Sooy def quiz bi, tontu yi ak leeral yi dañuy feeñ.
- Ban laaj kontrefaktuel mooy fonction yi am ci njeexte?
- naka la perte ci point test bi di soppikoo sudee dindi nañu misaalu tàggat yaram wala ñu yokk pondération bi
- naka la model bi di doxee ci moyenne
- naka la modelu saxaar yi di gaawe
- Ñaata parametre la model bi am
- Ban mbir ci math mooy tax xayma yi gëna yombatul ci model yu mag yi?
- Fonction softmax bi
- Hessian bu dëddu bu ñàkk
- Jadwalu tolluwaayu jàng
- Dayo lote bi
- Kan moo méngale fonction influence ak njàng mu xóot ci jamono jii ci benn téere bu siiw ci 2017?
- Goodfellow ak Bengio
- Vaswani ak ñeneen.
- Koh ak Liang
- Hinton ak Lekun
- Under Koh and Liang’s standard I_up,loss convention, what does a negative value indicate?
- The point was not in the training data
- Upweighting the point is estimated to increase test loss
- The point has no relationship to the test example
- Upweighting the point is estimated to lower test loss, so it is helpful
- Ban xayma la Anthropic jëfandikoo ngir yamale fonction yi ci modeli làkk yu mag yi?
- EK-FAC (courbure facteur de cronecker)
- Dàddu
- Seetug limyéer
- jaxase
- Lan la Anthropic ci jàngat biñ def ci misaal yu am solo yi?
- Dañuy nuru ay kopi yu gëna jub ci li ñuy génne
- Dañuy faral di bokk motif yu abstrak, duñu bokk kàddu yu nuróo
- Dañu leen séddale ci anam wu mucc
- misaalu tàggat bi njëkk kese moo am solo
- In the influence-function approximation, what connects a training-example gradient to the effect on a test loss?
- The test set’s token count
- A random forest over training labels
- The inverse Hessian of the training loss
- The model’s output vocabulary size
- If removing one training example is estimated to increase a test point’s loss, what does that suggest about the example?
- It was guaranteed to be a duplicate
- It had no relationship to the model
- It necessarily caused the model to overfit
- It had a helpful influence on that test point under the approximation