Up tókànItọsọna atẹle
Nsopọ nkankan ati Disambiguation
Èdè AI
Èdè AI Itọsọna
Idanimọ nkan ti a darukọ, tabi NER, ṣe idanimọ awọn ọrọ ti o tọka si awọn ẹka bii awọn eniyan, awọn ajo, ati awọn ibi.
Gbọ si itọsọna yiiAI-ṣe afihan · ~2 min
It finds mentions under a chosen schema. Linking a mention to a particular real-world record is a separate entity-linking task.
Define the entity types and span rules before training or evaluation. Should a company suffix be included? Is a product an organization, a separate type, or outside the schema? Inconsistent annotation rules can make a dataset internally contradictory. NER systems may assign token-level labels and combine adjacent tokens into spans. Subword tokenization requires care when aligning labels with the original text. Preserve character offsets so applications can show exactly which passage produced an extracted value. Evaluate both boundaries and types. Identifying only “Northstar” when the annotated organization is “Northstar Research Labs” may count as a span error even if the general category is correct. Report the matching convention with precision and recall so scores can be interpreted. Context can change the label. “Jordan” might identify a person, country, or organization in different passages. A recognized name is not verified identity information. When using extraction for redaction, search, or record matching, test the downstream outcome and handle ambiguous or missed mentions explicitly.
04Apẹẹrẹ ṣiṣẹ
Use the invented sentence “Jordan joined Northstar Research Labs in June.”
Mark Jordan as a person mention and Northstar Research Labs as an organization mention under a documented schema.
Do not attach a particular biography or company registration unless a separate linking step has evidence for that match.
Ohun ti o fihan
The constructed example separates locating a name from resolving who or what it identifies.
Highlight organizations mentioned in a news article with original text offsets.
Build a review queue for possible names before approving a redacted document.
Ìwé ìròyìn ọfẹ
Ìtàn AI mẹta tó jẹ́rìí ní gbogbo owurọ́ ọjọ́ iṣẹ́, kọ́wé ní Gẹ̀ẹ́sì tó rọrùn. Ọfẹ́ fún gbogbo àkókò, kò sí ìpolówó.
Ìmeèlì kan ní gbogbo ọjọ́ iṣẹ́. Yọkúrò ní ìkànìyàn ní ìkànìyàn kan. A kò ta tàbí pín àdírẹ́sì rẹ.
Ṣe idanwo fun ara rẹ
Ìdáhùn lẹ́sẹ̀kẹsẹ̀ lórí gbogbo ìdáhùn, àti iwe-ẹ̀rí tó lè pin pẹ̀lú ID tó lè jẹ́rìí lẹ́yìn tí o bá kọ́ ẹ̀kọ́.
Ṣe àtìlẹ́yìn ẹ̀kọ́ AI ọfẹ́. AI Understanding jẹ́ àjọ àìní èrè 501(c)(3) — kò sí ìpolówó, kò sí àkúnya owó, ní gbogbo àkókò. Ṣe ẹbun kan
No. A text mention can be ambiguous. Resolving it to a particular person requires additional evidence and a separate linking process.
Tesiwaju kikọ
Awọn itọsọna diẹ sii ti a yan fun koko yii
Up tókànItọsọna atẹle
Nsopọ nkankan ati Disambiguation
Èdè AI