音频人工智能指南

Democs 和 HT-Demucs 音乐源分离

Democs是Meta的开源音乐源分离模型; Hybrid Transformer Demucs (HT-Demucs) 使用波形和频谱图处理将歌曲分成人声、鼓、贝斯和其他主干。

听听这个指南AI叙述 · ~8 min

在本页阅读时间 9 分钟
  1. 主要要点
  2. 深入探讨
  3. Separating a song into four stems with Demucs
  4. 现实世界的实施
  5. Democs 和 HT-Demucs 音乐源分离的未来
  6. 付诸实践
  7. 资料来源与延伸阅读
  8. 不断探索
  9. 常见问题

主要要点

  1. Demucs is an open-source model family that separates a mixed song into vocals, drums, bass and other stems.
  2. The 2019 Demucs paper worked directly on waveforms and averaged 6.3 dB SDR on MUSDB18, beating the spectrogram methods it was compared against.
  3. Hybrid Demucs combined waveform and spectrogram branches and won Sony's Music Demixing Challenge 2021.
  4. Hybrid Transformer Demucs reached 9.20 dB SDR on MUSDB in 2022 using a cross-domain Transformer and 800 extra training songs.
  5. Separated stems still contain bleed between instruments, and the six-source model's piano output is described by its own documentation as weak.
  6. The official Meta repository is archived, and running the default model needs about 7 GB of GPU memory or runs slowly on a CPU.

深入探讨

Music source separation is the task of taking a mixed recording, the single stereo file that ends up on a streaming service, and recovering the individual parts that were added together to make it. The standard research setting asks for four stems: vocals, drums, bass and other, where other holds everything else. Demucs is a family of deep learning models for this task created by Alexandre Défossez and colleagues at Meta AI (then Facebook AI Research). The code and pretrained models are free on GitHub, and they became a common default for musicians, remixers, educators and researchers.

Most earlier systems worked on a spectrogram, a picture of sound that shows how much energy each frequency has at each moment, computed with the short-time Fourier transform (STFT). A network predicts a mask for each source, a set of values between 0 and 1 that says what fraction of each time-frequency cell belongs to, say, the vocals, and the masked spectrogram is turned back into audio. The weakness is phase, the timing information in each frequency component, which masks usually copy from the mixture rather than estimate. The original Demucs paper, posted in November 2019 by Défossez, Nicolas Usunier, Léon Bottou and Francis Bach, instead worked waveform to waveform: raw audio samples in, raw audio samples out, so the network learns phase as well as loudness.

That first model was a U-Net, an encoder-decoder network with skip connections that pass detail from each encoder layer straight to the matching decoder layer. The encoder is a stack of strided one-dimensional convolutions that shrink the time axis while adding channels, so deep layers summarize longer stretches of sound. A bidirectional LSTM, a recurrent layer that reads the compressed sequence forwards and backwards, sits in the middle to capture longer context. The decoder mirrors the encoder with transposed convolutions and outputs one waveform per source. The paper reported an average of 6.3 dB signal-to-distortion ratio (SDR) on the MUSDB18 test set with data augmentation, beating every architecture it compared against, and 6.8 dB with 150 extra training songs. For bass, that extra-data result surpassed the ideal ratio mask, an oracle that knows the true sources.

The second milestone was Hybrid Demucs, described by Défossez in November 2021 for the ISMIR 2021 Music Demixing (MDX) Workshop. It runs two U-Net branches in parallel, one on the waveform and one on the spectrogram, which share layers in the middle, and lets training decide which representation suits each source. Hybrid Demucs won the Music Demixing Challenge 2021 organized by Sony. It improved SDR by 1.4 dB across sources on MUSDB HQ, and in human listening tests scored 2.83 out of 5 for overall quality against 2.36 for the waveform-only version, with fewer contamination artifacts than the second-place challenge entry.

The third milestone, Hybrid Transformer Demucs (HT Demucs), was posted to arXiv in November 2022 by Simon Rouard, Francisco Massa and Défossez. It keeps the two-branch hybrid design but replaces the innermost layers with a cross-domain Transformer encoder, a stack of attention layers that let every time step look at every other and let the waveform and spectrogram branches exchange information. The paper found the Transformer performed poorly when trained only on the 100 MUSDB training songs but beat Hybrid Demucs by 0.45 dB when both used 800 extra songs. With sparse attention, which skips most pairwise comparisons so longer clips fit in memory, and per-source fine-tuning, it reached 9.20 dB SDR, then state of the art on MUSDB with extra data. HT Demucs is the v4 release and the default model in the package.

Compared with alternatives, Demucs sits between pure spectrogram maskers such as Open-Unmix, which scored 5.33 dB in the 2019 paper's comparison table, and pure waveform models such as Conv-TasNet, a speech separation network the 2019 paper adapted to music. The paper found Conv-TasNet scored well on numbers but human listeners heard significant artifacts, while Demucs sounded more natural. The hybrid design was a direct answer to the finding that some sources, such as sustained vocals, are easier in the frequency domain while transient drums are easier in the time domain.

Limits are audible. The 2019 paper's listeners noticed bleeding, where one instrument leaks into another stem, especially between vocals and other. The six-source model's piano stem is described in the README as weak. Scores come from MUSDB18, which holds 150 tracks and about 10 hours of mostly Western popular music, so results on orchestral, heavily processed or non-Western material may differ. The models also cannot recover what was never recorded separately: reverb shared by all parts, or two instruments playing the same note in the same register, will blur. Training data rights matter too, since MUSDB18 is restricted to academic use.

In practice, Demucs installs as a Python package and runs from the command line. The README says it needs at least 3 GB of GPU memory, about 7 GB with default settings, and a segment option lowers memory use at some cost in quality. On a CPU it takes roughly 1.5 times the length of the track. The original Meta repository is now archived and read-only because the author no longer works at Meta, and the README points to a personal fork maintained for important bug fixes. Separated stems are estimates, not the original multitracks, so anyone releasing a remix still needs the rights to the source recording.

03工作示例

Separating a song into four stems with Demucs

  1. Install the package with pip install demucs on a computer with Python, ideally with a GPU that has at least 3 GB of memory.

  2. Run demucs on a song file you have the rights to use; the default htdemucs model writes four WAV files: drums, bass, vocals and other.

  3. If memory runs out, add a smaller segment value, or add -d cpu and expect processing to take about 1.5 times the song's length.

  4. Listen to each stem on headphones and note bleed, for example cymbals faintly audible in the vocal stem.

  5. Re-run with -n htdemucs_ft and compare the vocal stems; the fine-tuned model is slower but may be slightly cleaner.

  6. Load all four stems into an audio editor at zero gain and play them together to check they add back up to the original mix.

它显示了什么

Four stem files and a written note on audible artifacts per stem. The sum check should sound almost identical to the original song; any obvious difference means a stem is missing content or a file was misaligned.

现实世界的实施

Making a karaoke track by running demucs --two-stems=vocals on a song, which the official README documents as a way to separate the vocals from everything else in one pass.

Isolating a drum or bass part for practice or transcription with the default htdemucs model, then checking the stem by ear for bleed from other instruments.

Using Demucs inside Ultimate Vocal Remover, an MIT-licensed desktop app whose credits list Demucs alongside MDX-Net and VR architectures as bundled separation models.

Benchmarking a new separation research model against Demucs on MUSDB18-HQ, the 150-track dataset of uncompressed stereo stems at 44.1 kHz used throughout the Demucs papers.

Splitting guitar and piano as extra stems with the experimental htdemucs_6s model, while noting the README's warning that its piano output has notable bleeding and artifacts.

Democs 和 HT-Demucs 音乐源分离的未来

Open problems in music source separation are now less about average benchmark scores and more about artifacts, data and scope. MUSDB18 is small and genre-limited, and the 2022 HT Demucs paper showed that its Transformer only beat older designs once 800 extra training songs were added, which points to data rather than architecture as the main constraint. Licensed multitrack data is scarce, and the benchmark itself is restricted to academic use. A second direction is more and finer stems, such as guitar, piano, strings and individual voices; the experimental six-source Demucs model shows the difficulty, since its own README calls the piano output weak. Evaluation is a third issue: SDR rewards low error energy but the 2021 Hybrid Demucs paper still relied on human listening tests to judge contamination and naturalness. Finally, the original Meta repository has been archived and is no longer maintained, so continued development depends on forks and on newer research systems that build on Demucs ideas.

付诸实践

为什么这很重要

  • 交通与覆盖范围. 它通过转录、旁白和语音界面提高了可访问性。
  • 成本与预算. 媒体团队可以用更少的预算更快地交付精美的音频。
  • 速度与规模. 面向客户的系统可以处理更大规模的语音交互。

留意

  • 如果未征得同意,语音滥用和冒充风险就会增加。
  • 由于口音、方言或嘈杂的环境,准确性可能会下降。
  • 如果没有明确的标签,合成音频可能会被误认为是真实的语音。

后续步骤

  1. 获得语音捕获、克隆和重用的明确同意。
  2. 测试不同扬声器和背景条件下的质量。
  3. 定义人员必须审查或批准输出的时间。
  4. 标记合成音频并保留来源记录以供问责。

资料来源与延伸阅读

  1. arXivMusic Source Separation in the Waveform Domain
  2. arXiv (ISMIR 2021 MDX Workshop)Hybrid Spectrogram and Waveform Source Separation
  3. arXiv (ICASSP 2023)Hybrid Transformers for Music Source Separation
  4. GitHub (Meta Research)facebookresearch/demucs: Code for the paper Hybrid Spectrogram and Waveform Source Separation
  5. SigSepMUSDB18 dataset
  6. GitHubUltimate Vocal Remover GUI

不断探索

免费通讯

获取每日AI简报

每个工作日早晨提供三条经过验证的AI故事,使用简明英文撰写。永久免费,无广告。

每个工作日发送一封邮件。一键退订。我们永不出售或分享您的地址。

测试一下自己

Take the Demucs and HT-Demucs Music Source Separation quiz

每个答案即时反馈,课程通过后可获得可验证ID的可分享证书。

开始测验

支持免费AI教育。AI Understanding是一家501(c)(3)非营利组织——无广告,无付费墙,永不收费。 捐款

常见问题

What is Demucs and HT-Demucs Music Source Separation?

Democs是Meta的开源音乐源分离模型; Hybrid Transformer Demucs (HT-Demucs) 使用波形和频谱图处理将歌曲分成人声、鼓、贝斯和其他主干。

Demucs 对完成的歌曲做了什么?

Democs 执行音乐源分离,将立体声混音分成单独的乐器和声乐部分。

是什么让 Hybrid Demucs 成为“混合体”?

Hybrid Demucs 结合了时域波形分支和频谱图分支,融合了它们的优势。

原始 Demucs 论文报告了 MUSDB 上分离质量的哪个指标?

原始论文报告了 MUSDB 上音乐源分离的平均 SDR;结果属于该基准和设置。

哪个研究组织与最初的 Democs 项目相关?

最初的 Demucs 论文列出了 FAIR 隶属关系,官方项目存储库位于 facebookresearch 下。这描述了该项目的研究起源。

为什么早期的 Democs 直接在原始波形上工作?

在波形域中操作可以保留相位,而频谱图幅度方法经常会丢弃该相位,而必须对其进行估计。