音频人工智能指南

Voicebox 流程匹配语音生成

Voicebox is a speech generation model from Meta AI, announced June 16, 2023, that learns one task, filling in masked stretches of speech given the surrounding audio and a transcript, and uses it for text-to-speech, editing, denoising and cross-lingual voice transfer.

听听这个指南AI叙述 · ~7 min

在本页阅读需 8 分钟
  1. 概述
  2. 主要要点
  3. 深入探讨
  4. Tracing a Voicebox-style speech edit
  5. 现实世界的实施
  6. Voicebox 流程匹配语音生成的未来
  7. 付诸实践
  8. 资料来源与延伸阅读
  9. 不断探索
  10. 常见问题

概述

It matters as an early large demonstration that flow matching, a faster alternative to diffusion, can power general-purpose speech generation, and as a case where the model was withheld over misuse risk.

主要要点

  1. Voicebox, from Meta AI in June 2023, learns to fill in masked speech from surrounding audio and a transcript, then reuses that skill for many tasks.
  2. It uses flow matching with straight-line optimal transport paths, generating all missing frames at once by solving an ODE.
  3. The audio model is a 24-layer Transformer with 330 million parameters, trained on 60,000 hours of English or 50,000 hours of multilingual audiobooks.
  4. Meta reported 1.9% word error rate for zero-shot text-to-speech versus 5.9% for VALL-E, and up to 20 times faster generation.
  5. Meta did not release Voicebox's model or code, citing potential misuse, and built a classifier to detect its generated speech.

深入探讨

Voicebox is a research model that generates speech. It was described in 'Voicebox: Text-Guided Multilingual Universal Speech Generation at Scale' by Matthew Le, Apoorv Vyas, Bowen Shi, Wei-Ning Hsu and colleagues, posted to arXiv on June 23, 2023 and accepted to NeurIPS 2023. Meta announced it on June 16, 2023. The core idea is that many speech tasks are the same problem in disguise. If a model can fill in a missing stretch of audio, given the audio around it and the words that should be spoken there, it can synthesize a sentence from scratch, fix a mistake, cover up noise, or continue a speaker's voice in another language.

The training task is called text-guided speech infilling. Each training clip comes with a transcript turned into phones, the basic sound units of a language, aligned to the audio frame by frame. During training, a large random chunk of the audio, usually 70% to 100% of its length, is hidden. The model sees the remaining audio and the full phone sequence and must produce the hidden part. Because the visible context carries the speaker's voice, emotion, microphone and background, the model learns to continue all of those in the missing region. Audio is represented as an 80-dimensional log Mel spectrogram at 100 frames per second, a compact picture of energy across frequencies over time, and a separate HiFi-GAN vocoder converts spectrograms back into waveforms.

Voicebox splits the work into two models. A duration model predicts how long each phone should last, which determines how many frames to generate. An audio model, a 24-layer Transformer with 330 million parameters, then generates the spectrogram frames. Unlike autoregressive systems that produce audio one token at a time from left to right, Voicebox is non-autoregressive: it produces all missing frames together and can use context from both before and after the gap.

The generative method is flow matching, introduced by Yaron Lipman and colleagues in a paper posted October 6, 2022. Like diffusion models, a flow-matching model turns random noise into data. Instead of learning to remove noise step by step, it learns a velocity field that tells each point how to move from noise toward data over an imaginary time running from 0 to 1. Voicebox uses the optimal transport path, in which each noise sample moves in a straight line toward its target. Training needs no simulation of the process, only a regression target at a random time. At inference, an ordinary differential equation (ODE) solver follows the learned velocity field from noise to speech. Each step is one function evaluation of the network, so the number of steps directly sets the cost, and a user can trade quality for speed at inference time without retraining.

The paper trained an English model on 60,000 hours of English audiobooks and a multilingual model on 50,000 hours of audiobooks in six languages. The paper stresses that this speech was neither filtered nor enhanced, so the model learned from audio with real-world noise and variation. Meta described the source as public domain audiobooks. Reported results include zero-shot text-to-speech with 1.9% word error rate and 0.681 speaker similarity, against 5.9% and 0.580 for VALL-E. For a 10-second clip with two function evaluations and no guidance, Voicebox took about 0.31 seconds, around 20 times faster than VALL-E; at 64 evaluations it was only 4% slower than VALL-E. On cross-lingual transfer it cut average word error rate from 10.9% to 5.2% compared with YourTTS.

The obvious comparison is VALL-E, described in a paper posted January 5, 2023. VALL-E treats speech as a language-modeling problem over discrete tokens from a neural audio codec, trained on 60,000 hours of English, and continues a 3-second prompt. That design generates left to right, so it cannot easily use future context for editing. Voicebox instead models continuous spectrograms and infills in both directions. Compared with diffusion-based speech models such as NaturalSpeech 2, the Voicebox paper notes it produces high-quality output with about 16 ODE steps where NaturalSpeech 2 uses 150 diffusion steps.

The limitations are stated in the paper itself. Training data is read audiobook speech, so the models may not transfer well to casual conversation with laughter and filler sounds. Voicebox depends on a phonemizer and a forced aligner to produce frame-level phone transcripts, and word-based phonemizers miss context-dependent pronunciations such as French liaisons. Style attributes are not separately controllable: a user cannot borrow the voice of one sample and the emotion of another. Meta also built a classifier to detect Voicebox audio. It separated original from generated audio perfectly in the paper's tests, most likely by spotting vocoder artifacts, but distinguishing Voicebox output from vocoder-resynthesized real speech was harder, with accuracy from 0.704 to 0.907 depending on how much was masked.

The largest practical constraint is access. Citing potential misuse, Meta did not release the Voicebox model or code, sharing only audio samples and the paper. Anyone wanting to use the approach must reimplement it and assemble tens of thousands of hours of transcribed speech, plus a vocoder and alignment tools. Generation cost depends on the number of ODE steps chosen, and classifier-free guidance, used to strengthen conditioning, doubles the computation per step.

04工作示例

Tracing a Voicebox-style speech edit

  1. Start with a 6-second recording of 'I will meet you on Tuesday' and its transcript, where the speaker should have said Thursday.

  2. Convert the audio to an 80-bin log Mel spectrogram at 100 frames per second, giving about 600 frames.

  3. Align the phones to frames with a forced aligner, then replace the phones for 'Tuesday' with those for 'Thursday', using the duration model to set their length.

  4. Build the mask: mark the frames of the new word as missing and keep every other frame as context.

  5. Sample Gaussian noise for the masked frames and integrate the learned velocity field from t = 0 to 1 with about 32 solver evaluations.

  6. Splice the generated frames into the context and convert the full spectrogram to audio with the vocoder.

它显示了什么

A recording that says Thursday in the same voice, room sound and pace, with the rest of the sentence unchanged. Check it by transcribing the output with a speech recognizer to confirm the new word, and by comparing the unmasked portion against the original, which should match closely.

现实世界的实施

Zero-shot text-to-speech: given a few seconds of an unseen speaker, Voicebox speaks new text in that voice; Meta reported 1.9% word error rate versus 5.9% for VALL-E.

Editing a recorded sentence by masking a misspoken word and regenerating only that span from corrected text, while the surrounding audio stays untouched.

Removing a burst of noise such as a car horn by masking the noisy segment and infilling clean speech that matches the speaker and transcript.

Cross-lingual style transfer across English, French, Spanish, German, Polish and Portuguese, where Meta reported average word error rate falling from 10.9% with YourTTS to 5.2%.

Generating diverse synthetic training data: a speech recognizer trained only on Voicebox output lost just 0.4 to 1.7 points of word error rate on LibriSpeech, per the paper.

Voicebox 流程匹配语音生成的未来

Meta's follow-up, Audiobox, posted December 25, 2023, extended the flow-matching approach to a unified model for speech and sound effects, added natural-language description prompts alongside example-based prompts, and reported that Bespoke Solvers sped up generation more than 25 times over the default ODE solver. That addresses one of Voicebox's stated gaps, independent control of voice, style and acoustic conditions. Other open problems are listed in the Voicebox paper: moving from read audiobooks to conversational speech, removing the dependence on phonemizers and forced aligners by taking raw text with punctuation, and covering more languages. On safety, the authors proposed embedding detectable fingerprints in generated speech rather than relying only on after-the-fact classifiers, since their own detector had a harder time separating generated speech from vocoder-resynthesized real speech. How openly to release voice-cloning models of this capability remains an open policy question, and Meta's June 2023 decision to withhold Voicebox is one documented reference point.

付诸实践

为什么这很重要

  • 交通与覆盖范围. 它通过转录、旁白和语音界面提高了可访问性。
  • 成本与预算. 媒体团队可以用更少的预算更快地交付精美的音频。
  • 速度与规模. 面向客户的系统可以处理更大规模的语音交互。

留意

  • 如果未征得同意,语音滥用和冒充风险就会增加。
  • 由于口音、方言或嘈杂的环境,准确性可能会下降。
  • 如果没有明确的标签,合成音频可能会被误认为是真实的语音。

后续步骤

  1. 获得语音捕获、克隆和重用的明确同意。
  2. 测试不同扬声器和背景条件下的质量。
  3. 定义人员必须审查或批准输出的时间。
  4. 标记合成音频并保留来源记录以供问责。

资料来源与延伸阅读

  1. arXiv (NeurIPS 2023)Voicebox: Text-Guided Multilingual Universal Speech Generation at Scale
  2. Meta AIIntroducing Voicebox: The first generative AI model for speech to generalize across tasks with state-of-the-art performance
  3. arXivFlow Matching for Generative Modeling
  4. arXiv神经编解码器语言模型是零样本文本到语音合成器
  5. arXivAudiobox: Unified Audio Generation with Natural Language Prompts

不断探索

免费通讯

获取每日AI简报

每个工作日早晨提供三条经过验证的AI故事,使用简明英文撰写。永久免费,无广告。

每个工作日发送一封邮件。一键退订。我们永不出售或分享您的地址。

测试一下自己

参加 Voicebox 流程匹配语音生成测验

每个答案即时反馈,课程通过后可获得可验证ID的可分享证书。

开始测验

支持免费AI教育。AI Understanding是一家501(c)(3)非营利组织——无广告,无付费墙,永不收费。 捐款

常见问题

什么是 Voicebox 流程匹配语音生成?

Voicebox is a speech generation model from Meta AI, announced June 16, 2023, that learns one task, filling in masked stretches of speech given the surrounding audio and a transcript, and uses it for text-to-speech, editing, denoising and cross-lingual voice transfer. It matters as an early large demonstration that flow matching, a faster alternative to diffusion, can power general-purpose speech generation, and as a case where the model was withheld over misuse risk.

Voicebox 针对哪些单一训练任务进行了优化?

Voicebox 经过训练,可以使用周围的音频和文本来填充语音的屏蔽部分,这是一种受语言模型启发的上下文表述。

Voicebox 使用哪种生成技术来代替扩散?

Voicebox 使用条件流匹配,学习将噪声传输为语音特征的速度场,并且可以使用 ODE 求解器高效求解。

Voicebox 如何在不重新训练的情况下调节目标说话者的语音生成?

该论文演示了使用参考音频作为上下文的零样本语音生成;这是一个推理时间条件,而不是模型重新训练。

Voicebox 论文报告的零样本 TTS 比较的效率结果如何?

作者报告称,在比较中,生成速度比 VALL-E 快 20 倍;这是特定于论文的结果和设置。

为什么 Meta 最初保留完整的 Voicebox 模型?

由于该模型可以令人信服地克隆声音,Meta 推迟了它并强调了检测合成语音的研究。