社團指南

Brazil's AI Bill (PL 2338/2023)

PL 2338/2023 is Brazil's proposed comprehensive AI law, a risk-based framework that bans 'excessive risk' AI, imposes duties on high-risk systems and gives affected people rights such as explanation and human review.

  • 4 分鐘閱讀
  • 最後更新
本頁4 分鐘閱讀
  1. 概述
  2. 深入探討
  3. 戰略影響
  4. The Future of Brazil's AI Bill (PL 2338/2023)
  5. 現實世界的實施
  6. 風險與防護欄
  7. 實施路線圖
  8. 不斷探索
  9. 常見問題

概述

The Senate approved it in December 2024 and it moved to the Chamber of Deputies for further debate. It matters because Brazil is Latin America's largest digital market and the bill also tackles copyright payment for AI training, an issue few laws address directly.

深入探討

Senate President Rodrigo Pacheco introduced PL 2338/2023 in May 2023, based on a draft prepared by a commission of legal experts after earlier, thinner bills were criticized. After a temporary Senate committee reworked it extensively, the full Senate approved a substitute text on December 10, 2024. Because Brazil's Congress is bicameral, the Chamber of Deputies must also approve it, and any changes there send it back to the Senate; it is not yet law. The bill sorts AI by risk. 'Excessive risk' uses are prohibited, including techniques that manipulate people into harmful behavior, exploiting vulnerabilities of groups such as children, government social scoring, systems used to produce or spread child sexual abuse material, and most real-time remote biometric identification in public spaces, subject to listed exceptions such as searching for missing persons. High-risk uses are listed by purpose, such as critical infrastructure, education and admissions, recruitment and worker evaluation, access to essential public and private services, criminal investigation, border control, health and autonomous vehicles. During negotiations some items, such as social media recommendation systems, were removed from the high-risk list. High-risk operators must document systems, test for bias, ensure human oversight and carry out algorithmic impact assessments. Affected people gain rights to information, explanation, contestation, human review and non-discrimination. The bill builds on the LGPD, Brazil's 2018 general data protection law, whose Article 20 already lets people request review of automated decisions. It proposes a National System for AI Regulation and Governance (SIA) coordinated by the data protection authority, ANPD, working with sector regulators. A misconception is that it is a copy of the EU AI Act; it shares the structure but places heavier emphasis on individual rights and includes copyright remuneration rules.

戰略影響

風險與安全

災難性和日常的人工智慧危害都取決於誰了解風險以及誰能夠採取行動。

更明確的決策

民眾和專業素養決定強而有力的安全政策在政治上是否可行。

突破炒作

清晰的解釋可以減少炒作、實驗室公關和模糊道德劇場的影響。

The Future of Brazil's AI Bill (PL 2338/2023)

The bill's final shape depends on the Chamber of Deputies, where a special committee has been examining it amid lobbying from technology companies, creative industries and civil society. The copyright remuneration provisions and the scope of the high-risk list are the most contested points, and both could change. If enacted, the law would likely phase in over time and rely on ANPD and sector regulators to issue detailed rules. Other Latin American countries have been drafting their own AI bills, so Brazil's outcome may influence regional approaches.

現實世界的實施

A Brazilian company using AI to rank job applicants would treat it as high-risk, run an algorithmic impact assessment and let rejected candidates request human review of the decision.

A state government planning a system to score citizens' social behavior to decide access to public services would be blocked, since government social scoring falls in the excessive-risk category.

A generative AI developer training on Brazilian news articles would have to disclose which protected works it used and respect rights holders who opt out, with remuneration owed for use of works under the bill's copyright chapter.

A person denied a public benefit by an automated system could invoke rights to be informed that AI was used, receive an explanation and contest the outcome.

風險與防護欄

  • 將存在風險視為科幻小說,同時能力複合。

  • 混淆了表面產品安全與高度自治下的對準。

  • 只給非英語和非專業觀眾留下低品質的資源。

實施路線圖

  1. 單獨的產品危害、誤用和失控/失調風險。

  2. 詢問哪些證據會改變您對時間表和嚴重性的看法。

  3. 比起行銷主張,更喜歡主要來源和具體評估。

  4. 確定一條行動路徑:職業、政策、資金或技能——而不僅僅是意識。

不斷探索

Free newsletter

Get the daily AI briefing

Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.

One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.

Test yourself

Take the Brazil's AI Bill (PL 2338/2023) quiz

Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.

開始測驗

Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation

常見問題

What is Brazil's AI Bill (PL 2338/2023)?

PL 2338/2023 is Brazil's proposed comprehensive AI law, a risk-based framework that bans 'excessive risk' AI, imposes duties on high-risk systems and gives affected people rights such as explanation and human review. The Senate approved it in December 2024 and it moved to the Chamber of Deputies for further debate. It matters because Brazil is Latin America's largest digital market and the bill also tackles copyright payment for AI training, an issue few laws address directly.

What is the legislative status of PL 2338/2023 as described in this guide?

The Senate passed a substitute text on December 10, 2024; the Chamber of Deputies must still approve it.

Which use falls under 'excessive risk' and is prohibited?

Social scoring by government is among the prohibited practices, alongside manipulation and exploitation of vulnerabilities.

Which was removed from the high-risk list during Senate negotiations?

Recommendation algorithms of social platforms were dropped from the high-risk list in negotiations.

Which right does the bill give people affected by AI decisions?

Rights include information, explanation, contestation, human review and non-discrimination.

What copyright obligation does the bill propose for AI developers?

Developers would disclose protected content used, respect opt-outs and owe remuneration, with some exceptions for research.