社團指南

India IT Rules on Deepfakes and Synthetic Content Labels

India’s IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules were amended in February 2026 to define synthetically generated information (SGI) and impose due-diligence duties on intermediaries.

  • 閱讀時間3分鐘
  • 最後更新
本頁閱讀時間3分鐘
  1. 概述
  2. 深入探討
  3. 戰略影響
  4. The Future of India IT Rules on Deepfakes and Synthetic Content Labels
  5. 現實世界的實施
  6. 風險與防護欄
  7. 實施路線圖
  8. 不斷探索
  9. 常見問題

概述

The operative definition targets realistic audio, visual or audiovisual content; later 2026 draft amendments are proposals, not current labeling rules.

深入探討

India’s Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 operate under the Information Technology Act, 2000. Gazette notification G.S.R. 120(E) amended the rules on February 10, 2026, with commencement on February 20. The amendments define synthetically generated information (SGI) as audio, visual or audiovisual information artificially or algorithmically created, generated, modified or altered to appear real, authentic or true and be indistinguishable or likely perceived as indistinguishable from a natural person or real-world event. Pure text by itself is not SGI under that definition, although other due-diligence rules still apply to unlawful text. The definition expressly excludes routine good-faith editing, technical correction or accessibility improvements where the content’s substance or meaning is not materially changed; ordinary document preparation is also excluded unless it creates false documents or electronic records. Under Rule 3(3), intermediaries whose resources enable creation, alteration, publication, transmission or sharing of SGI must deploy reasonable technical measures to prevent SGI that violates applicable law. Permissible SGI must carry a clear, prominent label or notice; audiovisual media use visible labeling, audio uses a prefixed disclosure, and provenance metadata or another technical mechanism with a unique identifier is required to the extent technically feasible. Intermediaries must not enable removal or suppression of these identifiers. Significant social media intermediaries have an additional ex-ante duty under Rule 4(1A): obtain a user declaration before display, upload or publication, use reasonable and proportionate measures to verify it, and ensure confirmed SGI is labeled. The obligations bind intermediaries; they do not amount to a general standalone statute ordering every person who creates AI media to use a specified label. The IT Act safe harbour under section 79 depends on meeting statutory conditions and due diligence; noncompliance does not automatically resolve liability without applying those rules. MeitY’s March and April 2026 Second Amendment drafts proposed further changes, but they remained draft notices without Gazette numbers or commencement dates as of September 26.

戰略影響

風險與安全

災難性和日常的人工智慧危害都取決於誰了解風險以及誰能夠採取行動。

更明確的決策

民眾和專業素養決定強而有力的安全政策在政治上是否可行。

突破炒作

清晰的解釋可以減少炒作、實驗室公關和模糊道德劇場的影響。

The Future of India IT Rules on Deepfakes and Synthetic Content Labels

The operative SGI rules took effect February 20, 2026. MeitY later published Second Amendment drafts in March and April, including proposed changes to label presentation and ministerial guidance powers; as of September 26 no final Gazette notification for those drafts was found. Recheck the Gazette for a final instrument before treating proposed text as law. MeitY has separately circulated draft Second Amendment Rules, but draft text with blank notification and commencement dates does not change the February rules. Keep compliance records tied to the final Gazette instrument and check for a later notification before changing controls.

現實世界的實施

A platform enabling realistic AI voice or video uploads adds a visible synthetic-content notice and provenance metadata where required by Rule 3(3).

A significant social media intermediary asks uploaders to declare SGI status and uses reasonable technical measures to verify declarations before publication.

A creator uses AI to brighten, stabilize or caption genuine footage without materially changing its meaning; the 2026 rule definition contains specified routine-editing and accessibility exclusions.

A policy team reads a later draft proposal for continuous on-screen labels separately from the operative February 2026 Gazette text.

風險與防護欄

  • 將存在風險視為科幻小說,同時能力複合。

  • 混淆了表面產品安全與高度自治下的對準。

  • 只給非英語和非專業觀眾留下低品質的資源。

實施路線圖

  1. 單獨的產品危害、誤用和失控/失調風險。

  2. 詢問哪些證據會改變您對時間表和嚴重性的看法。

  3. 比起行銷主張,更喜歡主要來源和具體評估。

  4. 確定一條行動路徑:職業、政策、資金或技能——而不僅僅是意識。

不斷探索

Free newsletter

Get the daily AI briefing

Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.

One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.

Test yourself

Take the India IT Rules on Deepfakes and Synthetic Content Labels quiz

Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.

開始測驗

Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation

常見問題

What is India IT Rules on Deepfakes and Synthetic Content Labels?

India’s IT (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules were amended in February 2026 to define synthetically generated information (SGI) and impose due-diligence duties on intermediaries. The operative definition targets realistic audio, visual or audiovisual content; later 2026 draft amendments are proposals, not current labeling rules.

When did India’s SGI amendments to the IT Rules take effect?

G.S.R. 120(E) was notified February 10 and provides that the amendment rules commence February 20, 2026.

What kind of content is SGI under the amended Rule 2 definition?

The definition is limited to audio, visual or audiovisual information appearing real and likely indistinguishable from real people or events.

Which practice can be excluded from SGI when it does not materially change meaning?

The rule excludes routine, good-faith editing or technical correction that does not materially alter or misrepresent content.

What must intermediaries do with permissible SGI under Rule 3(3)?

The rule calls for a prominent label or disclosure plus persistent provenance metadata or another identifier mechanism to the extent feasible.

What additional pre-publication step applies to significant social media intermediaries?

Rule 4(1A) requires a user declaration and reasonable verification before display, upload or publication.