本頁4 分鐘閱讀
概述
Internationally, Japan led the G7 Hiroshima AI Process, which produced a code of conduct for organizations developing advanced AI. Together they show an alternative to the EU's binding risk-based model: coordinate, guide and name problems, while relying on existing laws for harms.
深入探討
Japan's law, the Act on the Promotion of Research and Development and Utilization of AI-Related Technologies, was enacted in May 2025. It is a framework law: it states basic principles, assigns responsibilities to the national government, local governments, research institutions, businesses and citizens, and establishes an AI Strategy Headquarters led by the Prime Minister with all cabinet ministers. The headquarters drafts an AI Basic Plan setting national policy. The government's stated aim is to make Japan the easiest country in the world to develop and use AI while addressing risks such as misuse, privacy violations and copyright problems. What the law lacks is as important as what it contains. It creates no categories of banned or high-risk AI and no financial penalties. Businesses have a duty to cooperate with government measures. The government can research AI misuse, provide guidance and advice, and publicize cases where rights are seriously harmed. Enforcement of actual harms still runs through existing laws on privacy (the Act on the Protection of Personal Information), copyright, product liability and competition. Detailed expectations sit in soft law. The AI Guidelines for Business, published in April 2024 by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, consolidated earlier guidance and describe responsibilities for developers, providers and business users, and are updated periodically. Internationally, Japan used its 2023 G7 presidency to launch the Hiroshima AI Process. In late 2023 the G7 released International Guiding Principles and an International Code of Conduct for organizations developing advanced AI systems, and later a Comprehensive Policy Framework. A common misconception is that Japan has no AI policy; it has a deliberate policy that favors coordination and voluntary commitments over prohibitions.
戰略影響
風險與安全
災難性和日常的人工智慧危害都取決於誰了解風險以及誰能夠採取行動。
更明確的決策
民眾和專業素養決定強而有力的安全政策在政治上是否可行。
突破炒作
清晰的解釋可以減少炒作、實驗室公關和模糊道德劇場的影響。
The Future of Japan's AI Promotion Act and the Hiroshima AI Process
Japan's approach will be tested by how actively the AI Strategy Headquarters uses its powers of investigation and guidance, and by how detailed the AI Basic Plan becomes. If significant harms occur that existing laws handle poorly, pressure for binding rules could grow, and the government has said it will revisit its approach as technology and risks evolve. Internationally, the Hiroshima Process continues through its reporting framework and a group of supporting countries beyond the G7. Whether voluntary reporting produces meaningful comparisons between companies, rather than generic statements, is still an open question.
現實世界的實施
A Japanese manufacturer building an AI quality-inspection tool uses the government's AI Guidelines for Business to set up internal governance, such as defining who is responsible for testing and how risks are documented.
After a serious incident involving an AI service that harms users' rights, the government could investigate under the Promotion Act, request cooperation and, in serious cases, publicly disclose information about the case, even though it cannot fine the company under that law.
A large AI developer headquartered outside Japan publishes a report through the OECD reporting framework describing how it follows the Hiroshima Code of Conduct on risk evaluation and transparency.
A Japanese research lab trains a model on copyrighted text for data analysis purposes, relying on Article 30-4 of the Copyright Act, while checking that use does not unreasonably harm copyright holders' interests.
風險與防護欄
將存在風險視為科幻小說，同時能力複合。
混淆了表面產品安全與高度自治下的對準。
只給非英語和非專業觀眾留下低品質的資源。
實施路線圖
單獨的產品危害、誤用和失控/失調風險。
詢問哪些證據會改變您對時間表和嚴重性的看法。
比起行銷主張，更喜歡主要來源和具體評估。
確定一條行動路徑：職業、政策、資金或技能——而不僅僅是意識。
不斷探索
Free newsletter
Get the daily AI briefing
Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.
One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.
Test yourself
Take the Japan's AI Promotion Act and the Hiroshima AI Process quiz
Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.
Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation
常見問題
What is Japan's AI Promotion Act and the Hiroshima AI Process?
Japan regulates AI through a light-touch, promotion-first law passed in May 2025, backed by voluntary government guidelines for businesses rather than strict prohibitions or fines. Internationally, Japan led the G7 Hiroshima AI Process, which produced a code of conduct for organizations developing advanced AI. Together they show an alternative to the EU's binding risk-based model: coordinate, guide and name problems, while relying on existing laws for harms.
Which body does Japan's AI Promotion Act establish?
The headquarters includes all cabinet ministers and drafts the AI Basic Plan.
What enforcement tool does the government have under the Act in serious cases?
The Act has no financial penalties; the government can investigate, give guidance and publicize serious cases.
Which statement best describes the Act's treatment of high-risk AI?
The law is a framework focused on promotion and coordination, not risk classification.
Who published the AI Guidelines for Business in April 2024?
The two ministries consolidated earlier guidance into one document covering developers, providers and business users.
Which three roles do the business guidelines distinguish?
Responsibilities are set out for each actor in the AI value chain.
繼續學習
相關指南
為此主題精選的更多指南