返回新聞
安全性AI Understanding 簡報

Anthropic 透過三個存取層擴展網路驗證計劃

Anthropic 已將其 Glasswing 專案和網路驗證計劃整合為一個統一的產品,為安全專業人員提供三個不同的存取級別,為防禦性和授權的進攻性網路安全工作提供對 Claude Mythos 5.1 和 Opus 5.5 等高級人工智慧模型的分層存取。

5 min readRead the primary source
Source-provided image accompanying Anthropic expands Cyber Verification Program with three access tiers
主要來源文件來源記錄
出版商
anthropic.com
來源類型
主要文件-我們直接閱讀的官方公告、文件、文件或第一方頁面。
背景60 秒內了解這一點

關鍵術語

零資料保留
一種策略,在處理超出短暫的操作視窗後,不儲存請求/回應有效負載。
人工智慧安全
該領域專注於減少人工智慧系統中的有害行為、故障和誤用風險。

發生了什麼事

Anthropic launched an expanded Cyber Verification Program (CVP) that integrates its previous Project Glasswing and CVP initiatives into a single framework with three access tiers: Defense Access, Red Team Access, and Specialized Access. This program grants qualifying security professionals access to advanced AI models, including Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Sonnet 5.5, and Claude Mythos 5.1, with reduced cyber-blocking classifiers tailored to the specific scope of their work. The tiers range from defensive operations and malware analysis to authorized penetration testing and specialized testing of critical safety systems, with verification requirements and security controls scaling according to the tier's risk profile.

Anthropic has unified its Project Glasswing and Cyber Verification Program into a new, expanded Cyber Verification Program (CVP). This consolidated program introduces three distinct access tiers designed to match the scope of security work: Defense Access, Red Team Access, and Specialized Access. Each tier provides access to Anthropic's most capable models, including Claude Opus 5.5, Claude Sonnet 5.5, and Claude Mythos 5.1, but with varying levels of cyber-blocking safeguards.

The Defense Access tier is intended for defensive work such as security operations, incident response, and malware reverse-engineering. It is open to a broad range of entities, including corporate security teams, nonprofits, universities, government bodies, critical infrastructure operators, and individual researchers with a track record of reporting vulnerabilities. Anthropic states it aims to respond to applications for this tier within a few days.

Red Team Access adds authorized penetration testing and red-teaming capabilities to the defensive uses. This tier is restricted to organizations, such as in-house red teams and security firms, and requires a more rigorous review process that may take several weeks. Users in this tier are still subject to real-time blocks on actions that could cause physical harm or mass disruption, such as deploying ransomware or testing high-risk safety systems.

Specialized Access is the most restricted tier, reserved for a limited set of verified organizations authorized to test safety-critical systems like flight operating systems, power grids, and interbank transfer infrastructure. This tier has the fewest cyber blocks and requires in-depth review in collaboration with the US government. Existing members of Project Glasswing will transition to this tier without reapproval for current models.

To ensure safety, Anthropic requires data retention for all enrolled organizations to monitor for misuse, although it notes that organizations with access to Claude Fable 5.1 or Claude Mythos 5.1 with can use the CVP with zero data retention until the Enterprise Frontier Safeguards (EFS) are available later this fall. The program is available on the Claude Platform, Google Cloud’s Vertex AI, and Microsoft Foundry, with limited availability on Amazon Bedrock for EFS-eligible customers.

來源詳情: anthropic.com ↗

為什麼這很重要

This development addresses the dual-use nature of AI in cybersecurity by creating a structured pathway for defenders to access powerful offensive capabilities without exposing them to the general public. By formalizing access tiers, Anthropic aims to balance the need for robust defensive tools against the risk of malicious exploitation. The program is significant because it operationalizes the use of advanced AI for vulnerability discovery and incident response, potentially accelerating the patching of critical software flaws and strengthening the security posture of critical infrastructure, while maintaining strict oversight through data retention and government collaboration for the highest-risk activities.

The expansion of the CVP is significant because it formalizes the use of advanced AI for offensive cybersecurity tasks, which are typically restricted in generally available models due to dual-use risks. By creating tiered access, Anthropic allows defenders to utilize the full potential of models like Claude Mythos 5.1 for vulnerability discovery and penetration testing, which can significantly accelerate the identification and remediation of security flaws.

Anthropic cites data from Project Glasswing, where partners uncovered at least 129,000 verified software vulnerabilities between April and July 2026, with over 33,000 rated as critical or high-severity. The company claims that these models increased the rate of vulnerability finding by months or even years compared to manual efforts. This suggests that the new CVP could have a substantial impact on the overall security of software ecosystems and critical infrastructure.

The program also highlights the evolving landscape of and security. By implementing strict verification processes, data retention requirements, and real-time blocking for high-risk actions, Anthropic is attempting to mitigate the risks associated with providing powerful cyber capabilities to a broader audience. This approach may set a precedent for how other AI companies manage dual-use capabilities in the future.

For security professionals, the CVP offers a legitimate and supported pathway to access advanced AI tools for their work, reducing the need to rely on potentially unsafe or unauthorized methods. This could lead to a more robust and collaborative security community, where defenders are better equipped to protect against increasingly sophisticated cyber threats.

Interactive Mechanism

互動機制:它實際上是如何運作的

以互動方式探索這項發展背後的基礎技術。

System Requirements:
Best ArchitecturePure RAGRecommended pattern
Hallucination RiskVery LowGrounding efficacy
Update Cost$0 (Vector sync)Ongoing maintenance
Core takeaway: Fine-tuning teaches models how to speak (form, style, syntax); RAG teaches models what to say (verifiable facts). Never use fine-tuning alone for factual memory.
互動式概念檢查+10 Points
AI Ethics Quiz

Why can ethical evaluation not be reduced to one model score?

接下來看什麼

Monitor the adoption rates of the new CVP tiers among critical infrastructure operators and government agencies. Watch for the release of Enterprise Frontier Safeguards (EFS) later this fall, which will allow eligible organizations to use while maintaining robust safeguards. Additionally, track the reported impact of the program on vulnerability discovery rates, as Anthropic claims partners have already identified over 129,000 verified vulnerabilities through similar initiatives.

The rollout and adoption of the three CVP tiers will be a key indicator of the program's success. Watch for announcements from major critical infrastructure operators, government agencies, and large security firms regarding their enrollment in the program and their experiences with the new access levels.

The release of Enterprise Frontier Safeguards (EFS) later this fall is another important development to monitor. EFS will combine with robust safeguards, addressing privacy concerns for organizations that are hesitant to share data with Anthropic. The availability of EFS could expand the pool of eligible organizations for the CVP.

Anthropic has stated that it will share more about its efforts to secure open-source software and critical infrastructure in the coming weeks. These updates may provide further insights into the practical impact of the CVP and the specific vulnerabilities discovered through the program.

The response from the cybersecurity community and regulatory bodies to the CVP will also be worth watching. The program's tiered approach and strict verification processes may be viewed as a positive step in responsible AI deployment, or it may face scrutiny over the potential for misuse despite the safeguards in place.

相關指引和測驗

覺得有用嗎?