返回新聞
安全性AI Understanding 簡報

研究人員使用 Anthropic 的 Claude AI 攻擊 OpenAI 員工的 ChatGPT 帳戶

安全研究人員使用 Anthropic 的 Claude Opus 5 破解了 OpenAI 員工的 ChatGPT 帳戶,並存取了公司內部的 GitHub 環境。

4 min readRead the original reporting
Source-provided image accompanying Researchers Use Anthropic's Claude AI to Hack OpenAI Employee's ChatGPT Account
歸因報告來源記錄
出版商
venturebeat.com
來源連結
venturebeat.comhttps://venturebeat.com/security/openai-hacked-by-small-team-of-white-hat-security-researchers-using-anthropics-claude-opus-5
來源類型
新聞媒體的報道-不是第一方文件。

我們無法獨立確認的內容: 此聲明歸因於指定的商店。我們沒有根據第一方文件對其進行驗證。 (venturebeat.com)

背景60 秒內了解這一點

從這裡開始

測試一下自己AI 代理測驗

發生了什麼事

Security researchers from Hacktron AI used Anthropic's Claude Opus 5 to hack an OpenAI employee's ChatGPT account and reach the company's internal GitHub environment. The researchers discovered a vulnerability in OpenAI's single sign-on implementation that allowed them to turn control of the forum environment into access to ChatGPT and Codex accounts belonging to users who had authenticated through the service. They then used the compromised employee account's access to Codex to create a harmless pull request in OpenAI's internal monorepo, demonstrating that the account compromise could extend beyond ChatGPT itself into connected developer infrastructure.

The researchers used Anthropic's Claude Opus 5 to investigate the vulnerable libheif package and develop an exploit.

They initially used Claude Opus 4.8 but switched to Opus 5, which produced a working ARM64 exploit within hours.

The researchers then adapted the exploit to the x86-64 and jemalloc environment used by Discourse.

The full path from discovery to access to OpenAI's repository environment took less than 72 hours.

The researchers reported the findings through OpenAI's Bugcrowd program on July 25 and received a payout of $6,500.

來源詳情: venturebeat.com ↗

為什麼這很重要

This incident highlights the risks associated with AI agents connected to business systems and the importance of isolating untrusted file-processing pipelines, keeping low-level dependencies aggressively patched, constraining federated identity trust, and treating AI-agent credentials with the same scrutiny as privileged human accounts.

The incident highlights the risks associated with AI agents connected to business systems.

It demonstrates how AI coding agents are changing the economics of sophisticated vulnerability exploitation.

The researchers argue that frontier coding agents can increasingly perform much of the incremental exploit-development work under human direction.

The broader libheif ecosystem reinforces the maintenance problem, with dozens of security advisories published during 2026.

The incident emphasizes the need for organizations to take a more proactive approach to security, including isolating untrusted file-processing pipelines, keeping low-level dependencies aggressively patched, constraining federated identity trust, and treating AI-agent credentials with the same scrutiny as privileged human accounts.

Interactive Mechanism

互動機制:它實際上是如何運作的

以互動方式探索這項發展背後的基礎技術。

Agent Lifecycle Stage:
1
User Intent & Planning: "Audit customer refund request #4092 and settle payment."
2
Tool Calling: Emits structured JSON call crm_get_transaction(id='4092').
3
Guardrail & Verification:🛡️ Paused: High-value action requires human operator sign-off.
4
Final Settlement: Refund recorded, email receipt dispatched, and audit log stored.
Core takeaway: An AI agent is not just a language model—it is a closed loop of planning, tool invocation, and environment feedback. Production systems require self-healing retries and strict human approval guardrails.
互動式概念檢查+10 Points
AI Agents Quiz

An agent must create a draft calendar event for Tuesday at 2 p.m. Which evidence would establish the requested result?

接下來看什麼

The incident demonstrates how AI coding agents are changing the economics of sophisticated vulnerability exploitation and the need for organizations to take a more proactive approach to security.

The incident demonstrates the potential impact of AI agents on security.

It highlights the need for organizations to take a more proactive approach to security.

The researchers argue that AI coding agents are changing the economics of sophisticated vulnerability exploitation.

The incident emphasizes the importance of isolating untrusted file-processing pipelines and keeping low-level dependencies aggressively patched.

The researchers note that the same class of models is making technically difficult exploit development faster and less expensive.

相關指引和測驗

人工智慧代理人工智慧安全測試你所知道的—嘗試免費的人工智慧測驗在我們的詞彙表中尋找人工智慧術語關注AI監管追蹤器
覺得有用嗎?