Als nächstesNächster Leitfaden
KI-Ethik
Gesellschaft
Gesellschaftsführer
AI Ethics for Counselors and Therapists
AI ethics for counselors and therapists means applying duties you already have, such as competence, informed consent, confidentiality and avoiding harm, to AI note-takers, chatbots and clinical decision aids.
Auf dieser Seite4 Minuten gelesen
Übersicht
It matters because licensing boards hold the clinician responsible for any AI-assisted work that touches a client. The software vendor does not carry that responsibility.
Tiefer Einblick
No major counseling or psychology ethics code was written with generative AI in mind, but the existing standards still apply to it. The ACA Code of Ethics (2014) has Section H on distance counseling, technology and social media. It requires counselors to understand the technology they use, explain its benefits and risks during informed consent, and protect electronic records. The APA Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct requires psychologists to work within their competence, get informed consent and keep information confidential. The NASW Code of Ethics added technology standards for social workers in its 2017 revision. Professional associations have since issued AI-specific guidance, and it mostly restates these themes rather than creating new duties. Four obligations come up again and again. Competence: understand what a tool does, where it fails and how it stores data before you rely on it; Informed consent: clients should know when AI records, transcribes or drafts anything about them, and they should be able to decline; Confidentiality: in the US, entering identifiable client information into a consumer chatbot that has no business associate agreement can violate HIPAA, whatever your intent; and Accountability: a note, diagnosis or treatment plan you sign is yours, even if software drafted it. State law is changing too. In 2025 Illinois passed a law that bars AI systems from providing therapy or making therapeutic decisions on their own. It still allows AI for administrative and supporting tasks under a licensed professional's oversight. Other states have considered or passed rules on mental health chatbots. Rules differ from state to state, so check with your own board. One common misconception is that de-identifying data solves every problem. Removing names does nothing about accuracy, bias, or the way a tool's output can quietly shape your clinical judgment. Another is that a vendor's "HIPAA compliant" label moves responsibility onto the vendor. It does not.
Strategische Auswirkungen
Risiko und Sicherheit
Sowohl katastrophale als auch alltägliche Schäden durch KI hängen davon ab, wer die Risiken versteht und wer handeln kann.
Klarere Entscheidungen
Die öffentliche und berufliche Bildung bestimmt, ob eine starke Sicherheitspolitik politisch möglich ist.
Sich durch den Hype schneiden
Klare Erklärungen reduzieren die Vereinnahmung durch Hype, Labor-PR und vages Ethik-Theater.
The Future of AI Ethics for Counselors and Therapists
Expect more detailed guidance rather than new ethical principles. Professional associations will probably keep updating their AI statements as the tools change. More state legislatures are debating limits on AI that presents itself as a therapist. Insurers and malpractice carriers may also start asking practices to document how they use AI. The core questions will stay the same. Does the clinician understand the tool? Does the client know about it and agree? Is the data protected? Is a licensed human still responsible for clinical decisions? Clinicians who build these habits now will find it easier to adapt to whatever rules come next.
Reale Umsetzung
Before using an ambient AI scribe for session notes, a counselor confirms the vendor will sign a HIPAA business associate agreement. She adds AI recording to her informed consent form and lets clients opt out without any effect on their care.
A psychologist pastes a de-identified vignette into a chatbot to brainstorm differential diagnoses. She checks each suggestion against DSM-5-TR criteria and her own assessment instead of copying it into the record.
A group practice writes an AI policy. It lists approved tools and banned uses, such as typing client names into consumer chatbots, and says who reviews AI drafts and how errors are documented.
A client mentions using a companion chatbot between sessions. The therapist asks about it without judgment, talks about what it cannot do in a crisis, and makes sure the client has a real crisis line, such as 988 in the US.
Risiken und Leitplanken
Das existentielle Risiko wird als Science-Fiction behandelt, während sich die Fähigkeiten verstärken.
Verwechslung von Oberflächenproduktsicherheit mit Ausrichtung unter hoher Autonomie.
Nicht-englischsprachigen und nicht fachkundigen Zielgruppen stehen nur Quellen von geringer Qualität zur Verfügung.
Implementierungs-Roadmap
Separate Risiken für Produktschäden, Missbrauch und Kontrollverlust/Fehlausrichtung.
Fragen Sie, welche Beweise Ihre Sicht auf Zeitpläne und Schweregrad ändern würden.
Bevorzugen Sie Primärquellen und konkrete Bewertungen gegenüber Marketingaussagen.
Identifizieren Sie einen Aktionspfad: Karriere, Politik, Finanzierung oder Fähigkeiten – nicht nur Bewusstsein.
Entdecken Sie weiter
Free newsletter
Get the daily AI briefing
Three verified AI stories every weekday morning, written in plain English. Free forever, no ads.
One email each weekday. Unsubscribe in one click. We never sell or share your address.
Test yourself
Take the AI Ethics for Counselors and Therapists quiz
Instant feedback on every answer, and a shareable certificate with a verifiable ID once you pass a course.
Support free AI education. AI Understanding is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit — no ads, no paywall, ever. Make a donation
Häufig gestellte Fragen
What is AI Ethics for Counselors and Therapists?
AI ethics for counselors and therapists means applying duties you already have, such as competence, informed consent, confidentiality and avoiding harm, to AI note-takers, chatbots and clinical decision aids. It matters because licensing boards hold the clinician responsible for any AI-assisted work that touches a client. The software vendor does not carry that responsibility.
Which section of the 2014 ACA Code of Ethics covers distance counseling, technology and social media?
Section H of the 2014 ACA Code covers distance counseling, technology and social media. It requires counselors to understand the technology they use and to explain its risks during informed consent.
Under US HIPAA, what should a therapist confirm before entering identifiable client information into an AI tool?
Entering identifiable client information into a tool whose vendor has not signed a business associate agreement can violate HIPAA, whatever the clinician intended.
According to the guide, what did the 2025 Illinois law do?
The Illinois law bars AI systems from providing therapy or making therapeutic decisions on their own. It still allows administrative and supporting uses under a licensed professional.
A counselor signs an AI-drafted progress note that contains an error. Who is accountable, according to the guide?
The guide says a note, diagnosis or plan you sign belongs to you, even if software drafted it. A vendor's compliance label does not move that responsibility.
Why does the guide say de-identifying data does not solve every ethical problem?
Removing names protects identity. It does not make the output accurate or unbiased, and it does not stop the output from shaping the clinician's thinking.
Lerne weiter
Verwandte Leitfäden
Weitere Leitfäden zu diesem Thema ausgewählt